Is our offseason over?
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
Is our offseason over?
-
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 16,851
- And1: 3,442
- Joined: May 22, 2001
- Location: Santa Cruz, CA
-
Is our offseason over?
We made some changes already for sure. Hopefully RJ comes back healthy. But is this our lineup for 2017-18?
Re: Is our offseason over?
- GreekAlex
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,201
- And1: 1,815
- Joined: Jul 10, 2009
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: Is our offseason over?
Unless another team needs help facilitating a trade or is in a bind ala Boston, I don't see anything changing beside adding some 2 way contracts.
At this point the Pistons players need to show value on the court before they're worth dealing. As of today most of the players are worth more here than elsewhere.
At this point the Pistons players need to show value on the court before they're worth dealing. As of today most of the players are worth more here than elsewhere.
Re: Is our offseason over?
- Kilo
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,257
- And1: 5,245
- Joined: Jun 18, 2011
-
Re: Is our offseason over?
We'll make two additions by using the two-way G-League contracts, but other than that - We're done.
Only player I could still see possibly traded is Jon Leuer, and only for different look PF. I keep track of JaMychel Green situation here.
Only player I could still see possibly traded is Jon Leuer, and only for different look PF. I keep track of JaMychel Green situation here.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland
VW to Portland

Re: Is our offseason over?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,311
- And1: 1,383
- Joined: Nov 11, 2008
Re: Is our offseason over?
I think it's done. The only exception I could see is Detroit getting in on the Anthony trade because Houston and New York need at least one other team to make it work (since the Knicks aren't taking Ryan Anderson and a future first back for Carmelo). But even then there are a bunch of other teams out there that could get involved so I don't know how likely the Pistons are, especially being decently close to the luxury tax.
Otherwise it's pretty clear Jackson and Drummond aren't being moved. Would make no sense to trade Harris since he and Johnson are the only two guys who can play the three in lineups with only regular size. On the other hand moving one of Leuer or Marjanovic would make sense but I don't think there are any takers for them. It's a terrible market for centers and Jon's value is only neutral at best. The Pistons don't really need anything anywhere else so moving him for a similar talent/value/contract for someone who plays a different position doesn't hold much appeal.
Langlois had a tweet the other day that said the roster was going to stand at 14 players plus the two-way contracts so I'm not expecting another free agent being signed. Would just (and could only) be a guy on the minimum anyways.
Otherwise it's pretty clear Jackson and Drummond aren't being moved. Would make no sense to trade Harris since he and Johnson are the only two guys who can play the three in lineups with only regular size. On the other hand moving one of Leuer or Marjanovic would make sense but I don't think there are any takers for them. It's a terrible market for centers and Jon's value is only neutral at best. The Pistons don't really need anything anywhere else so moving him for a similar talent/value/contract for someone who plays a different position doesn't hold much appeal.
Langlois had a tweet the other day that said the roster was going to stand at 14 players plus the two-way contracts so I'm not expecting another free agent being signed. Would just (and could only) be a guy on the minimum anyways.
Re: Is our offseason over?
- Kilo
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,257
- And1: 5,245
- Joined: Jun 18, 2011
-
Re: Is our offseason over?
For the record I was counting "free agent signed" as signing those two-way contract players because they are free agents and they could play with the team next season in limited amount of games.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland
VW to Portland

Re: Is our offseason over?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,963
- And1: 2,829
- Joined: Jun 01, 2013
-
Re: Is our offseason over?
coordinator0 wrote:I think it's done. The only exception I could see is Detroit getting in on the Anthony trade because Houston and New York need at least one other team to make it work (since the Knicks aren't taking Ryan Anderson and a future first back for Carmelo). But even then there are a bunch of other teams out there that could get involved so I don't know how likely the Pistons are, especially being decently close to the luxury tax.
Otherwise it's pretty clear Jackson and Drummond aren't being moved. Would make no sense to trade Harris since he and Johnson are the only two guys who can play the three in lineups with only regular size. On the other hand moving one of Leuer or Marjanovic would make sense but I don't think there are any takers for them. It's a terrible market for centers and Jon's value is only neutral at best. The Pistons don't really need anything anywhere else so moving him for a similar talent/value/contract for someone who plays a different position doesn't hold much appeal.
Langlois had a tweet the other day that said the roster was going to stand at 14 players plus the two-way contracts so I'm not expecting another free agent being signed. Would just (and could only) be a guy on the minimum anyways.
If Jon has a good season this year, I can see teams trying to trade for his services when they try to make a weird playoff run. I think Jon is going to be a great trade chip.
Boban, I have no idea. We're looking pretty bad on the full time backup center spot after losing Baynes.
Re: Is our offseason over?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,613
- And1: 1,421
- Joined: Jul 25, 2010
-
Re: Is our offseason over?
The roster will continue to turnover every year. I imagine that once Jackson gets his legs back his value will go up and he'll get traded as his peak value as we've learned SVG loves to take advantage of. Contracts look better after half a year. SVG love to take advantage of teams wanting to get rid of contracts they can't afford. It's tough with Jackson's contract but maybe a team will need a PG after an injury and we have good backup PGs on the team.
Defense wins championships
Re: Is our offseason over?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,465
- And1: 2,323
- Joined: Apr 01, 2013
-
Re: Is our offseason over?
We will still sign a couple guys to 2-way contracts, I figure. I don't see another trade unless something shakes loose around training camp. The teams that needed to move players for cap relief have done so (Thanks, Boston!).
Re: Is our offseason over?
- Pharaoh
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,443
- And1: 4,742
- Joined: Aug 10, 2001
Re: Is our offseason over?
I don't think Jon is going anywhere. At his price, in his likely role he's a good contract.
He can kind of space the floor, kind of put the ball on the floor, kind of play good D...dude got gassed last season for obvious reasons.
Dre - Jon
Jon - Tobias
SJ - Tobias
AB - Galloway
RJ - Ish
We should fit much better this season as opposed to having 2 halves of a roster that doesn't
Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app
He can kind of space the floor, kind of put the ball on the floor, kind of play good D...dude got gassed last season for obvious reasons.
Dre - Jon
Jon - Tobias
SJ - Tobias
AB - Galloway
RJ - Ish
We should fit much better this season as opposed to having 2 halves of a roster that doesn't
Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app
Re: Is our offseason over?
- Blkbrd671
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,862
- And1: 4,819
- Joined: Oct 05, 2010
- Location: Guam,USA
-
Re: Is our offseason over?
Got a feeling if somethinig happens its going to be around the Melo Trade
Re: Is our offseason over?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,311
- And1: 1,383
- Joined: Nov 11, 2008
Re: Is our offseason over?
DBC10 wrote:If Jon has a good season this year, I can see teams trying to trade for his services when they try to make a weird playoff run. I think Jon is going to be a great trade chip.
Boban, I have no idea. We're looking pretty bad on the full time backup center spot after losing Baynes.
Yeah, if Leuer is as good to start the season as he was last year that's a really nice player that can fill in a stretch four or five while not being a liability on defense. Just don't think he has that kind of value at this moment because of his big dropoff/lost confidence after becoming a starter (or a little while after becoming a starter).
I'm perfectly happy with Marjanovic and would like to see Van Gundy actually utilize him on a consistent basis. With Baynes out that has a good chance of happening and I'm eager to see it. To me backup center is pretty solid with Marjanovic as the big guy and Leuer as the mobile guy... and both being plus free throw shooters to spell Drummond when needed. I'm not concerned with a full-time backup at that position because I'd rather see a variety of lineups and to go smaller these days it's hard to commit to one player there.
I actually don't want the Pistons to move either guy, not at all really, just if a move was made one of those two make the most sense given the circumstances. If I were higher on Ellenson it would probably be a bigger deal but I'm not so him having to fight for minutes doesn't bother me. The concept of burying first round picks behind multiple players who could/should see the court does... when it's a player I think can become something. Henry still has too far to go athletically and skillfully for me to start buying into the hype.
Re: Is our offseason over?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,910
- And1: 829
- Joined: Jun 02, 2016
-
Re: Is our offseason over?
Yeah don't see us making any more moves outside of 2 way deals.
If Leuer is coming off the bench I'm a happy camper because that means Stanley won the SF job.
He was perfect off the bench for us. SVG brought excitement to me with this team again!
If Leuer is coming off the bench I'm a happy camper because that means Stanley won the SF job.
He was perfect off the bench for us. SVG brought excitement to me with this team again!
Re: Is our offseason over?
- BadMofoPimp
- RealGM
- Posts: 48,956
- And1: 12,461
- Joined: Oct 12, 2003
- Location: In the Paint
Re: Is our offseason over?
Leuer will log some time at Center so I doubt Leuer will be traded.

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
Re: Is our offseason over?
- Laimbeer
- RealGM
- Posts: 42,955
- And1: 15,114
- Joined: Aug 12, 2009
- Location: Cabin Creek
-
Re: Is our offseason over?
If we have to rely on Leuer whenever Dre needs to sit, we are in trouble.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
Re: Is our offseason over?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,311
- And1: 1,383
- Joined: Nov 11, 2008
Re: Is our offseason over?
Laimbeer wrote:If we have to rely on Leuer whenever Dre needs to sit, we are in trouble.
Depends on what Leuer you're getting. Early season Leuer last year was a really good player. Top three on the team with early season Caldwell-Pope and Harris (who was good all year). Late season Leuer... not so much. Might have been him not handling extended minutes over a whole season for the first time in his career well, but it looked like a confidence thing more than anything else.
And it's not going to be Leuer out there every time either. Boban will get time too if the matchup is right. Of course he's a guy that creates matchup problems on his own but Van Gundy is more reactive than proactive so I doubt we'll see him trying to force opposing teams to accommodate. Mobile defense is a definitely issue there, but it's not like he's a bad player overall.
Re: Is our offseason over?
- Pharaoh
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,443
- And1: 4,742
- Joined: Aug 10, 2001
Re: Is our offseason over?
Anyone that believes Bobo is gonna play 15-20 minutes every night is setting themselves up for disappointment IMO
He simply can't play that many minutes every night. He's too big & slow for the league
Some nights he'll play those 15-20 minutes and some nights he wont play at all...which will have some on here blowing up deluxe about what a waste of cap space Bobo is/was.
We can 8 mile every situation we're gonna see this season and the general reaction of the forum:
RJ is hobbled = trade him for whatever we can, SVG was stupid to sign him to big money, he's a poor excuse for a PG/Leader
Dre doesn't show obvious improvement or pouts = SVG shouldn't have signed him to the max, dump him while we can, he only plays to make friends and doesn't care
Kennard doesn't get minutes = wasted pick again, SVG buries kids, he'll never develop on the bench
One could go on and on with what if scenarios but right now I'm pretty happy with the squad we've got considering my off-season goals:
Goal #1: Get a true pro/leader on this team.
Accomplished via AB
Goal #2: Get guys that can shoot and/or defend and/or create off the bounce.
Accomplished via AB, Galloway, Kennard, Tolliver
I view our off-season as:
AB replaces Mook as leader and is a much better fit on both ends
Tolliver replaces Baynes as a locker room presence and a guy that plays better than most people think
Galloway replaces KCP and while he's not better than KCP he still brings 3 & D
Kennard replaces Beno as the guy we want to see get more minutes
RJ - Ish - Galloway
AB - Kennard
SJ - Harris - Bullock
Jon - Tolliver - Henry
Dre - Bobo - Moreland
No need to add another vet IMO
I'd prefer we go for high upside dudes with the 2 way deals though
Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app
He simply can't play that many minutes every night. He's too big & slow for the league
Some nights he'll play those 15-20 minutes and some nights he wont play at all...which will have some on here blowing up deluxe about what a waste of cap space Bobo is/was.
We can 8 mile every situation we're gonna see this season and the general reaction of the forum:
RJ is hobbled = trade him for whatever we can, SVG was stupid to sign him to big money, he's a poor excuse for a PG/Leader
Dre doesn't show obvious improvement or pouts = SVG shouldn't have signed him to the max, dump him while we can, he only plays to make friends and doesn't care
Kennard doesn't get minutes = wasted pick again, SVG buries kids, he'll never develop on the bench
One could go on and on with what if scenarios but right now I'm pretty happy with the squad we've got considering my off-season goals:
Goal #1: Get a true pro/leader on this team.
Accomplished via AB
Goal #2: Get guys that can shoot and/or defend and/or create off the bounce.
Accomplished via AB, Galloway, Kennard, Tolliver
I view our off-season as:
AB replaces Mook as leader and is a much better fit on both ends
Tolliver replaces Baynes as a locker room presence and a guy that plays better than most people think
Galloway replaces KCP and while he's not better than KCP he still brings 3 & D
Kennard replaces Beno as the guy we want to see get more minutes
RJ - Ish - Galloway
AB - Kennard
SJ - Harris - Bullock
Jon - Tolliver - Henry
Dre - Bobo - Moreland
No need to add another vet IMO
I'd prefer we go for high upside dudes with the 2 way deals though
Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app
Re: Is our offseason over?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,753
- And1: 22,818
- Joined: Oct 08, 2013
-
Re: Is our offseason over?
Pharaoh wrote:Anyone that believes Bobo is gonna play 15-20 minutes every night is setting themselves up for disappointment IMO
He simply can't play that many minutes every night. He's too big & slow for the league
Some nights he'll play those 15-20 minutes and some nights he wont play at all...which will have some on here blowing up deluxe about what a waste of cap space Bobo is/was.
We can 8 mile every situation we're gonna see this season and the general reaction of the forum:
RJ is hobbled = trade him for whatever we can, SVG was stupid to sign him to big money, he's a poor excuse for a PG/Leader
Dre doesn't show obvious improvement or pouts = SVG shouldn't have signed him to the max, dump him while we can, he only plays to make friends and doesn't care
Kennard doesn't get minutes = wasted pick again, SVG buries kids, he'll never develop on the bench
One could go on and on with what if scenarios but right now I'm pretty happy with the squad we've got considering my off-season goals:
Goal #1: Get a true pro/leader on this team.
Accomplished via AB
Goal #2: Get guys that can shoot and/or defend and/or create off the bounce.
Accomplished via AB, Galloway, Kennard, Tolliver
I view our off-season as:
AB replaces Mook as leader and is a much better fit on both ends
Tolliver replaces Baynes as a locker room presence and a guy that plays better than most people think
Galloway replaces KCP and while he's not better than KCP he still brings 3 & D
Kennard replaces Beno as the guy we want to see get more minutes
RJ - Ish - Galloway
AB - Kennard
SJ - Harris - Bullock
Jon - Tolliver - Henry
Dre - Bobo - Moreland
No need to add another vet IMO
I'd prefer we go for high upside dudes with the 2 way deals though
Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app
I actually like the roster at the moment. Need to just wait now for the right trade to pop up again. Curious to see if Reggie can come back healthy which would really raise the ceiling here after adding AB.
Re: Is our offseason over?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,311
- And1: 1,383
- Joined: Nov 11, 2008
Re: Is our offseason over?
Pharaoh wrote:Anyone that believes Bobo is gonna play 15-20 minutes every night is setting themselves up for disappointment IMO
He simply can't play that many minutes every night. He's too big & slow for the league
Some nights he'll play those 15-20 minutes and some nights he wont play at all...which will have some on here blowing up deluxe about what a waste of cap space Bobo is/was.
I don't think anybody does believe or expect that. Haven't seen it around at least. Just that there's a chance/likelihood he will get those 15ish minutes some nights like you said. Which is great.
But with the NBA the way it is you need lineups that can run too so Marjanovic or any traditional center is out of place. Even Baynes was last season despite him being a really solid defender. But that's where Leuer comes in since he can run and actually defend to and on the perimeter. Especially against the likes of what opposing teams will put on the floor for those mobile lineups. But like I said before I think the concept of a single backup center is pretty much dead. It's more about being able to throw multiple looks at teams or match up with multiple looks being thrown at you. So even if Boban isn't the consistent backup he could/should be utilized enough to be worth most of his contract.
For what it's worth I'm alright with the team as it stands too. Would have been nice to see Jackson and/or Drummond moved, but their market had to be ice cold and the Pistons want to win games. It is what it is, so this offseason was pretty decent in that regard.
Re: RE: Re: Is our offseason over?
- Pharaoh
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,443
- And1: 4,742
- Joined: Aug 10, 2001
Re: RE: Re: Is our offseason over?
MotownMadness wrote:Pharaoh wrote:Anyone that believes Bobo is gonna play 15-20 minutes every night is setting themselves up for disappointment IMO
He simply can't play that many minutes every night. He's too big & slow for the league
Some nights he'll play those 15-20 minutes and some nights he wont play at all...which will have some on here blowing up deluxe about what a waste of cap space Bobo is/was.
We can 8 mile every situation we're gonna see this season and the general reaction of the forum:
RJ is hobbled = trade him for whatever we can, SVG was stupid to sign him to big money, he's a poor excuse for a PG/Leader
Dre doesn't show obvious improvement or pouts = SVG shouldn't have signed him to the max, dump him while we can, he only plays to make friends and doesn't care
Kennard doesn't get minutes = wasted pick again, SVG buries kids, he'll never develop on the bench
One could go on and on with what if scenarios but right now I'm pretty happy with the squad we've got considering my off-season goals:
Goal #1: Get a true pro/leader on this team.
Accomplished via AB
Goal #2: Get guys that can shoot and/or defend and/or create off the bounce.
Accomplished via AB, Galloway, Kennard, Tolliver
I view our off-season as:
AB replaces Mook as leader and is a much better fit on both ends
Tolliver replaces Baynes as a locker room presence and a guy that plays better than most people think
Galloway replaces KCP and while he's not better than KCP he still brings 3 & D
Kennard replaces Beno as the guy we want to see get more minutes
RJ - Ish - Galloway
AB - Kennard
SJ - Harris - Bullock
Jon - Tolliver - Henry
Dre - Bobo - Moreland
No need to add another vet IMO
I'd prefer we go for high upside dudes with the 2 way deals though
Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app
I actually like the roster at the moment. Need to just wait now for the right trade to pop up again. Curious to see if Reggie can come back healthy which would really raise the ceiling here after adding AB.
I'm kinda hoping RJ is as weak mentally as I think he is now!
Assuming AB walks in like he owns the joint RJ will follow him as opposed to leading others into the "Imma get Mine!" mentality
AB, Tobias & SJ have the right mental make up IMO - if RJ joins that then Dre will follow as well...
Which gives us 5 guys who should not only fit really well on and off the floor but should be capable of making some noise.
Even if everything breaks right with them and Jon, Ish, Galloway & Kennard can bring it off the pine I think we're still one quality forward away from really having something here.
I don't think King Henry is that guy unfortunately because he's too perimeter orientated and we need a slashing 3/4 - it's one reason why I'd prefer Tobias to come off the bench
Dre - Jon - SJ - AB - RJ should be well balanced offensively & defensively.
Jon - Tobias - Kennard - Galloway - Ish as small ball off the bench
Bobo/Moreland - Jon - Tobias - Kennard - Ish/Galloway for more size.
People trash me for wanting a 10+ man rotation...I don't get it!
We have no advantages over most teams - we're not more talented than most! Using our depth to our advantage and playing more guys keeps the lesser guys fresh and throws different defenders at your opponent
Dre 33
Jon 28
Tobias 30
SJ 28
AB 32
RJ 26
Ish 22
I think all those are "fair" & "reasonable"
After that it depends on match ups, development & who has it going on any given night but I don't think there's a big difference for SVG between these groups:
Tolly - Bobo - Moreland - Henry. Only 15 minutes available if Jon plays strictly as a 4 so some nights it should be Henry or Moreland just for their own development and other nights it can be Tolliver or Bobo depending on match up
Going with one of those guys (most likely Tolliver) brings the rotation to 9, possibly 10 already if you split those 15 minutes between 2 guys.
Kennard - Galloway - Bullock. A lot of minutes available here (26) & you don't want to throw Kennard to the wolves immediately - he should get some burn most nights to aid in his development though...so lets say 10-15 minutes.
Now the rotation is at 10 or possibly 11 if you used 2 guys up front.
That leaves Galloway & Bull to battle for 10-15 minutes and I think that's fine
Yeah it's a possible 12 man rotation but IDGAF:
Dre 33
Jon 28
Tobias 30
SJ 28
AB 32
RJ 26
Ish 22
Kennard 15
1 of the 4 bigs 15
Galloway or Bullock 11
IF we go with 9 guys I can't wait to see the minutes breakdown on that! Cause I personally can't see it
Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app
Re: Is our offseason over?
- Snakebites
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 50,911
- And1: 18,051
- Joined: Jul 14, 2002
- Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
-
Re: Is our offseason over?
Fundamentally, most likely.
There might be a minor roster move or two, but I think it's pretty unlikely we open the year with a team drastically different than what it appears to be now.
There might be a minor roster move or two, but I think it's pretty unlikely we open the year with a team drastically different than what it appears to be now.