Page 1 of 4
Realistic Trade Destinations for Reggie and Drummond
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2017 8:30 pm
by sfballa13
List your best Reggie/Drummond trades, not many teams could use these guys so the list should be small
What about a 3 team deal:
To Nets: Reggie Jackson, Boban
To Dallas: Drummond, Galloway
To Pistons: Lin, Wes Matthews, Noel, Mozgov
Lin / Ish
Bradley / Wes Matthews
Tobias / Stanley
Leuer / Tolliver
Noel / Mozgov
Re: Realistic Trade Destinations for Reggie and Drummond
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2017 8:37 pm
by Spider156
Why start a new thread over it and why even think of trade ideas that none of us have control over? Pointless
Re: Realistic Trade Destinations for Reggie and Drummond
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2017 8:40 pm
by DETermination
I don't even want to think about a Drummond or Reggie trade until we are halfway through the season
Re: Realistic Trade Destinations for Reggie and Drummond
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2017 8:48 pm
by Pharaoh
Realistically their values are so low you're better off holding them and hoping they can regain value before the deadline.
As for the OP: Noel is on his QO so we wouldn't get his Bird Rights in the deal and then couldn't retain him
Re: Realistic Trade Destinations for Reggie and Drummond
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2017 8:49 pm
by Arp590
DETermination wrote:I don't even want to think about a Drummond or Reggie trade until we are halfway through the season
This, give them one last chance.
Drummond has been talking a lot this off-season, so let's see if he can live up to his words.
Re: Realistic Trade Destinations for Reggie and Drummond
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:11 pm
by Richard Miller
sfballa13 wrote:What about a 3 team deal:
To Nets: Reggie Jackson, Boban
To Dallas: Drummond, Galloway
To Pistons: Lin, Wes Matthews, Noel, Mozgov
Looks pretty dire
Re: Realistic Trade Destinations for Reggie and Drummond
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:14 pm
by Snakebites
Pharaoh wrote:Realistically their values are so low you're better off holding them and hoping they can regain value before the deadline.
As for the OP: Noel is on his QO so we wouldn't get his Bird Rights in the deal and then couldn't retain him
This. No sense selling low. They're pretty close to untradable ATM unless you want to swap them for other awful contracts. I'm pessimistic that they'll play better but we really don't have a better option right now.
And the second part of your post brings back memories of when we had Monroe on the QO, and the posters of this forum, refusing to understand this dynamic, posted trade after trade after trade after trade after trade after trade after trade...
My sanity still hasn't fully recovered.
Re: Realistic Trade Destinations for Reggie and Drummond
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2017 10:33 pm
by Kilo
Nowhere.
If they play well, we keep them. And if they play like cah-cah, we're stuck with them.
Re: Realistic Trade Destinations for Reggie and Drummond
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:48 am
by Snakebites
Kilo wrote:Nowhere.
If they play well, we keep them. And if they play like cah-cah, we're stuck with them.
If they play well I'd definitely be open to trading them to kick start a rebuild, honestly.
Re: Realistic Trade Destinations for Reggie and Drummond
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:15 am
by Kilo
Snakebites wrote:Kilo wrote:Nowhere.
If they play well, we keep them. And if they play like cah-cah, we're stuck with them.
If they play well I'd definitely be open to trading them to kick start a rebuild, honestly.
I would be as well - especially Reggie. But Stan isn't going to sell for a rebuild. Neither is Gores. If both play well we're a play-off team in the East, and that means playoff gate money.
If they're playing well we probably "buy" at the deadline, trading our 2018 first, potentially Ellenson and disposable contracts for a PF.
Re: Realistic Trade Destinations for Reggie and Drummond
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:15 am
by TPA
God. I can't even read these topics anymore.
Re: Realistic Trade Destinations for Reggie and Drummond
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 5:17 am
by Snakebites
Kilo wrote:Snakebites wrote:Kilo wrote:Nowhere.
If they play well, we keep them. And if they play like cah-cah, we're stuck with them.
If they play well I'd definitely be open to trading them to kick start a rebuild, honestly.
I would be as well - especially Reggie. But Stan isn't going to sell for a rebuild. Neither is Gores. If both play well we're a play-off team in the East, and that means playoff gate money.
If they're playing well we probably "buy" at the deadline, trading our 2018 first, potentially Ellenson and disposable contracts for a PF.
You'd think they'd get the god damned hint after nearly a decade of suck.
But yeah, seems like they won't. My goodness rooting for this team has been a nightmare for the last 9 years.
Re: RE: Re: Realistic Trade Destinations for Reggie and Drummond
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 9:16 am
by Pharaoh
Snakebites wrote:Kilo wrote:Snakebites wrote:
If they play well I'd definitely be open to trading them to kick start a rebuild, honestly.
I would be as well - especially Reggie. But Stan isn't going to sell for a rebuild. Neither is Gores. If both play well we're a play-off team in the East, and that means playoff gate money.
If they're playing well we probably "buy" at the deadline, trading our 2018 first, potentially Ellenson and disposable contracts for a PF.
You'd think they'd get the god damned hint after nearly a decade of suck.
But yeah, seems like they won't. My goodness rooting for this team has been a nightmare for the last 9 years.
Agreed but I too believe that if things are going reasonably we'll be buyers at the deadline.
We've got a lot of smaller team friendly deals (Ish, Bobo, Galloway), a large reasonable deal (Jon) & a couple of picks (Henry & 2018) to offer.
That's approx $20 mil of salary going out if it's Jon + Ish + Henry (+ Pick) and leaves us with:
Dre - Bobo - Moreland
Harris - Tolliver
SJ - Bullock
AB - Kennard
RJ - Galloway
Obvious target for that package is a forward
Re: RE: Re: Realistic Trade Destinations for Reggie and Drummond
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 11:56 am
by Kilo
Pharaoh wrote:Snakebites wrote:Kilo wrote:
I would be as well - especially Reggie. But Stan isn't going to sell for a rebuild. Neither is Gores. If both play well we're a play-off team in the East, and that means playoff gate money.
If they're playing well we probably "buy" at the deadline, trading our 2018 first, potentially Ellenson and disposable contracts for a PF.
You'd think they'd get the god damned hint after nearly a decade of suck.
But yeah, seems like they won't. My goodness rooting for this team has been a nightmare for the last 9 years.
Agreed but I too believe that if things are going reasonably we'll be buyers at the deadline.
We've got a lot of smaller team friendly deals (Ish, Bobo, Galloway), a large reasonable deal (Jon) & a couple of picks (Henry & 2018) to offer.
That's approx $20 mil of salary going out if it's Jon + Ish + Henry (+ Pick) and leaves us with:
Dre - Bobo - Moreland
Harris - Tolliver
SJ - Bullock
AB - Kennard
RJ - Galloway
Obvious target for that package is a forward
I'd rather ship out Marjanovic than Leuer in your package, assuming they're providing salary more than on-court value to acquiring team - it's only 3M in difference so $17M vs $20M, and with 125% value allowed to come back we're not going to be limited by salary. I think Leuer is going to be Dre's primary back-up this season, I don't think Boban can play in the new NBA. Trade that package for a starting four/five and we're a better team for the now.
Re: Realistic Trade Destinations for Reggie and Drummond
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:46 pm
by Canadafan
If things don’t go to plan for Van Gundy again to begin the season, he may decide the lure of a pick still sitting in the Top Three by Christmas is enough to consider blowing it up. A package of Andre Drummond, Avery Bradley and Stanley Johnson while offloading the likes of Iman Shumpert and Channing Frye, has a little bit of everything for the Cavs. They may need to include a player like Tristan Thompson but it would be a worthy deal to compete next season and beyond – giving the Cavs three fifth’s of last seasons Celtics starting lineup, plus a dominant big and an intriguing young(ish) piece in Bradley.
Re: RE: Re: Realistic Trade Destinations for Reggie and Drummond
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:02 pm
by Pharaoh
Canadafan wrote:If things don’t go to plan for Van Gundy again to begin the season, he may decide the lure of a pick still sitting in the Top Three by Christmas is enough to consider blowing it up. A package of Andre Drummond, Avery Bradley and Stanley Johnson while offloading the likes of Iman Shumpert and Channing Frye, has a little bit of everything for the Cavs. They may need to include a player like Tristan Thompson but it would be a worthy deal to compete next season and beyond – giving the Cavs three fifth’s of last seasons Celtics starting lineup, plus a dominant big and an intriguing young(ish) piece in Bradley.
I assume we get the Brooklyn pick in that deal?
As much as some of us might like the idea of 2 top 5 picks arriving via the 2018 Draft I can't see SVG or Gores signing off on it.
They want to compete and make the playoffs now.
Any deal that gets us closer to that while maintaining some kind of financial flexibility going forward is far more likely than a tanking season
Re: Realistic Trade Destinations for Reggie and Drummond
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:23 pm
by Snakebites
I think SVG is out if this season starts badly.
Re: Realistic Trade Destinations for Reggie and Drummond
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:35 pm
by Cowology
Kilo pretty much summed up all my thoughts on this topic.
Re: Realistic Trade Destinations for Reggie and Drummond
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:43 pm
by Uncle Mxy
The Knicks, because they really need another C and they'll agree to most anything.
Re: Realistic Trade Destinations for Reggie and Drummond
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 5:23 pm
by ImHeisenberg
A ball dominant PG with a bum knee that's owed roughly $48 million over the next 3 years, and a guy with 4 years left on a max contract that is literally the worst free throw shooter in the history of the NBA, no offense outside of put-backs and being spoon fed easy buckets, and gave up on defending because that's not what all-stars do.
I guess there's the Kings.