Invictus88 wrote:Honestly I think a lot of the 'negativity' is actually in the form of reality checks from some posters to others.
Everyone here outside of some possible trolls wants to see the team succeed.
Some see the team failing and want to do anything they can to improve the situation right now. They propose hypothetical trades and sometimes those trades expend resources that can be better utilized elsewhere; albeit at a later point in time.
These same people see free agents pop up and immediately try to find ways this person can fit within the Pistons. Sometimes these players make sense; but other times the match isn't good. However, due to impatience/boredom/etc these people will forcibly seek out ways to 'make' said player fit. It's no fun watching the same players make the same mistakes. Play great one game and a player is anointed a superstar. Play bad another and we should waive and stretch. No middle ground. Just the extremes.
Then there are the people that look at the roster, the salary situation for not just this year but future years, the draft picks we have, the market we are in/the appeal of playing in Detroit, what kind of scheme we run, what kind of schemes work best in the league, what kind of talent is coming up from the college ranks, the temperament of players, etc.
They see a roster with heavy commitment to a few players and no really easy fixes. They look at the years to come and see the possibility for opportunity but it isn't necessarily in the short term, but that's okay. They see a bright future if we are smart with our assets and most of all patient. They've seen the success that other teams have had with similar approaches and the failures of teams that have taken approaches similar to ours.
I kind of liken the above behavior to going shopping at a department store.
Some people are the type that think about their current situation beforehand, enter the store with their list in mind and largely stick to the things on that list; the exceptions usually being some fire sale that likely still fits a 'nice to have but not necessary' item in their mind. These people have investments. They have savings accounts. They have retirement plans. They have assets.
Then there are those people that enter a store without a list in mind. They wander about the aisles, picking up an item and try to imagine ways this thing can fit into their life; sometimes even making up short-lived scenarios that don't really pan out in reality. These are the people whose shopping carts are filled to the brim with impulse items from end caps. These are the people who spend most of their paychecks and have little savings left over after all is said and done.
The 'negativity' that comes across is the second group trying to convey the patient approach to the first group. The first group doesn't want to hear it and gets frustrated. The second group gets frustrated by the first groups' responses back. Two camps form. Chaos ensues.
Great post and a helluva lot of effort put into it. I like your analogy and I think the entirety of this thread needs to keep the theme of this analogy.
In keeping with it, while I agree I think you forgot another type of shopper. The one that has $100 and sees the big screen in the window of the store for $300 and pisses and moans about not having the $300. You can tell them that Black Friday is coming and you just never know, you might be able to make that $100 work. Their response, "no shut up, I only have $100, not $300". You can tell them about Craigslist, marketplace, Mike down at the barbershop who be having the deals, etc, and it won't matter. All they'll focus on is what they don't have and refuse to listen to how what they DO have might have a workable solution. That's the one I can no longer take.
Sent from my SM-G955U using
RealGM mobile app