Post#192 » by Manocad » Mon Mar 4, 2019 1:15 am
I certainly didn't suggest that Stanley could be a pro bowl NFL player; he'd never make roster. You don't play basketball your whole life then pick up (or go back to) football in your mid-20's and be good enough to play in the NFL. My only point was that AS A FOOTBALL PLAYER, with Stanley's current build he'd be suited for only TE or DE. For the most part the NFL is a low center of gravity game not well-suited for guys with 6'6" frames. Unless they have blazing foot speed, and in terms of NFL foot speed guys that tall just don't.
EDIT: On a related note...it reminds me of the "Could Ronda Rousey beat up Ray Rice?" question a while back. She's 5'7", 165 and he's 5'8" 205. People arguing for Ray Rice used the reasoning of him being stronger, heavier, faster runner, and playing/hitting guys in the NFL as the basis for why he'd win the fight. I used the reasoning that she's a championship MMA fighter--a highly developed SPECIFIC SKILL SET that he, as an NFL player, does NOT have--as the basis for why she'd destroy him in a fight. Then it was "Yeah, but if just closed in on her, wrapped her up, with his strength he could blah blah blah" which would be the QUICKEST way for him to lose. She'd have him choked out in less than a minute.
Point being, greater strength and speed can certainly give you an advantage over the guy you're competing with who has the same skill set. But strength and speed in and of themselves do NOT provide you with any SPECIFIC skill sets. As proof, watch any fight in any team sport ever (especially the NBA, actually). By and large they're utterly laughable for one simple reason...fighting is not the specific skill set those players focused on and learned. Or watch non-baseball star athletes throw out ceremonial first pitches; by and large equally as pathetic.