RealGM

Blake Griffin and Chandler Parsons had the ultimate yacht party surrounded by plenty of women twerking and living it up.

Are they celebrating the upcoming Chandler Parsons trade to Detroit??????

Also, dig the backflip off the railing into the water.

The ocean-dwelling venue also hosted a bevy of female guests, some of whom put on a show as they twerked against the railing of the boat for the basketball stars.

Although the pro ballers had some of their boys over for the celebration, the guest list was mostly made up of bikini-clad women.

At one point, the power forward demonstrated his athletic prowess as he jumped off the edge of the boat into a back flip.

Sure as long as we get 10 future first round picks for him

Damn, live it up Blake, must be friggin nice

I don't think the motivation behind this party was anything NBA-related.

Well, that's one way to work on your game.

coordinator0 wrote:I don't think the motivation behind this party was anything NBA-related.

I don't think the motivation behind this thread was anything NBA-related.

The $140mil backflip

Reggie + Langston for Parsons is working financially and everyone is on expirings...

ducler wrote:Reggie + Langston for Parsons is working financially and everyone is on expirings...

just stop

The_Irony wrote:

ducler wrote:Reggie + Langston for Parsons is working financially and everyone is on expirings...

just stop

Honestly, if Blake wants him here, better wait for him to be bought out.

Sent from my STF-L09 using RealGM mobile app

We don't need party boy Blake here. Keep Parsons far away from the team, even if he wasn't washed.

Parsons traded to Atlanta after being unable to come to a buyout agreement with Memphis. For Plumlee and Hill.

Memphis breaks up 25M into two contracts, Atlanta picks up a roster spot.

I worry if Parsons is bought out he'd come here at the request of Blake. So I hope this means ATL has plans to keep him.

Other than still needing at least 2 bigs, Parsons on the minimum wouldn't be the worst thing in the world for on the court purposes.

Chandler is better than Snell, so he would likely start. The problem would be Snell becoming the backup 3 would severely eat into Sekou's path for developmental minutes. So either Sekou would get nothing but scraps his rookie year, or Snell's contract would become toxic because he wouldn't even be in the rotation.

thesack12 wrote:Other than still needing at least 2 bigs, Parsons on the minimum wouldn't be the worst thing in the world for on the court purposes.

Chandler is better than Snell, so he would likely start. The problem would be Snell becoming the backup 3 would severely eat into Sekou's path for developmental minutes. So either Sekou would get nothing but scraps his rookie year, or Snell's contract would become toxic because he wouldn't even be in the rotation.

Hes not better then snell

Parsons used to be better than Snell, not sure if he is today, if he was healthy I'd rather see him out there, but that is his whole deal, he's never healthy.

Lot of people around here gonna be pretty dissapointed in Snell after seeing him for 25 games or so.

thesack12 wrote:Lot of people around here gonna be pretty dissapointed in Snell after seeing him for 25 games or so.

Not at all just look at the stats, Parsons is complete ass and that’s if he even shows up on game day where Snell is just bad