Bradley Beal
Moderators: Snakebites, theBigLip, dVs33
Re: Bradley Beal
- Kilo
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,037
- And1: 5,101
- Joined: Jun 18, 2011
Re: Bradley Beal
Drummond, Kennard, 2 FRP's is a competitive offer for Beal, who is signed through next season. If Washington chooses a different offer, so be it. But that is a legitimate offer.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland
VW to Portland
Re: Bradley Beal
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,465
- And1: 1,261
- Joined: Jan 30, 2014
Re: Bradley Beal
We're not trading Drummond
Hopefully we offer a deal surrounding Kennard+multiple 1st rounders.
Hopefully we offer a deal surrounding Kennard+multiple 1st rounders.
Re: Bradley Beal
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,949
- And1: 653
- Joined: May 30, 2010
Re: Bradley Beal
Neptune wrote:We're not trading Drummond
Hopefully we offer a deal surrounding Kennard+multiple 1st rounders.
You’re right. Drummond doesn’t have the value to bring Beal back in any package.
RIP PALACE OF AUBURN HILLS
Re: Bradley Beal
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,696
- And1: 476
- Joined: Jul 23, 2002
- Location: Michigan
Re: Bradley Beal
I’d say nothing. I don’t see a realistic deal. I could easily see them asking for more than the PG13 trade cost.
Re: Bradley Beal
- ocellatus921
- Junior
- Posts: 357
- And1: 14
- Joined: Oct 22, 2008
Re: Bradley Beal
Trade Jackson, Galloway, Maker, Thomas & 2 1st round picks for Beal. If they want 3 1st round picks then I'd want them to throw us a 2nd round pick(2020).
Rose/Frazer/Napier
Beal/Kennard/Brown
Snell/Sekou/Svi
Griffin/Morris
Drummond/Noah
Then sign Joakim Noah & Shabazz Napier to veterans minimum
Rose/Frazer/Napier
Beal/Kennard/Brown
Snell/Sekou/Svi
Griffin/Morris
Drummond/Noah
Then sign Joakim Noah & Shabazz Napier to veterans minimum
Re: Bradley Beal
- Bartender
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,544
- And1: 3
- Joined: Feb 17, 2009
Re: Bradley Beal
If they trade Beal, they are going to want to unload Wall's contract as well... from what I read.
Jackson, Snell, Galloway and Maker for Beal and Wall work.
Wall / Rose / Bone
Beal / Brown / Kennard
Mykhailiuk / Doumbouya / Robinson III
Griffin / Doumbouya
Drummond / Zaza
Jackson, Snell, Galloway and Maker for Beal and Wall work.
Wall / Rose / Bone
Beal / Brown / Kennard
Mykhailiuk / Doumbouya / Robinson III
Griffin / Doumbouya
Drummond / Zaza
TSE wrote:Wow I actually like this trade, good job Mayhew!
Re: Bradley Beal
- zeebneeb
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,323
- And1: 10,525
- Joined: Jun 30, 2003
- Location: ANGERVILLE: Population 1
Re: Bradley Beal
I would do this deal in a heartbeat. I dont really care about Wall, but if he does somehow comeback healthy(low chance in my mind)great.Bartender wrote:If they trade Beal, they are going to want to unload Wall's contract as well... from what I read.
Jackson, Snell, Galloway and Maker for Beal and Wall work.
Wall / Rose / Bone
Beal / Brown / Kennard
Mykhailiuk / Doumbouya / Robinson III
Griffin / Doumbouya
Drummond / Zaza
Rose
Beal
Frenchy
Blake
Andre
Is a hell of a team.
Re: Bradley Beal
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,033
- And1: 2,339
- Joined: Feb 18, 2016
Re: Bradley Beal
[instagram][/instagram]
So in other words, Beal & Wall for a box of Crackerjacks. I'm sure the Wiz will be all over this. If they ever stop laughing.
Generally, there is value in expiring contracts for albatross contracts. But this isn't nearly enough. They'll want many picks on top of this.
.
Bartender wrote:If they trade Beal, they are going to want to unload Wall's contract as well... from what I read.
Jackson, Snell, Galloway and Maker for Beal and Wall work.
Wall / Rose / Bone
Beal / Brown / Kennard
Mykhailiuk / Doumbouya / Robinson III
Griffin / Doumbouya
Drummond / Zaza
So in other words, Beal & Wall for a box of Crackerjacks. I'm sure the Wiz will be all over this. If they ever stop laughing.
Generally, there is value in expiring contracts for albatross contracts. But this isn't nearly enough. They'll want many picks on top of this.
.
Re: Bradley Beal
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,209
- And1: 1,311
- Joined: Nov 11, 2008
Re: Bradley Beal
Miami being interested in Beal and willing to take Wall and his contract on does not mean the Wizards are actually interested in trading Beal.
Re: Bradley Beal
- Manocad
- RealGM
- Posts: 69,969
- And1: 10,561
- Joined: Dec 13, 2005
- Location: Middle Fingerton
- Contact:
Re: Bradley Beal
coordinator0 wrote:Miami being interested in Beal and willing to take Wall and his contract on does not mean the Wizards are actually interested in trading Beal.
Wait a minute...are you saying that in order for a trade to happen, the OTHER TEAM HAS TO HAVE INTEREST IN IT AS WELL?!?!?
mind = BLOWN
You have just torn the fabric of the RealGM Detroit Pistons forum space time continuum.
Re: Bradley Beal
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,113
- And1: 3,441
- Joined: Apr 19, 2010
- Location: Michigan
Re: Bradley Beal
flow wrote:[instagram][/instagram]Bartender wrote:If they trade Beal, they are going to want to unload Wall's contract as well... from what I read.
Jackson, Snell, Galloway and Maker for Beal and Wall work.
Wall / Rose / Bone
Beal / Brown / Kennard
Mykhailiuk / Doumbouya / Robinson III
Griffin / Doumbouya
Drummond / Zaza
So in other words, Beal & Wall for a box of Crackerjacks. I'm sure the Wiz will be all over this. If they ever stop laughing.
Generally, there is value in expiring contracts for albatross contracts. But this isn't nearly enough. They'll want many picks on top of this.
.
Taking on Wall's contract is a huge price to pay already but yeah, I agree we would still need to add some more. I would offer Jackson, Snell, Galloway, Kennard, and 2 future FRPs of the Wizards choosing. I think that is more than fair for Beal.
Wall/Rose/Frazier
Beal/Thomas
Doumbouya/Brown/Mykhailiuk
Griffin/Morris
Drummond/Maker
Championship team right there.
Re: Bradley Beal
-
- Cold Hard Gameday Facts
- Posts: 15,517
- And1: 8,942
- Joined: Jun 15, 2008
- Location: France
Re: Bradley Beal
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,950
- And1: 1,442
- Joined: Nov 03, 2014
Re: Bradley Beal
Snell LG Luke Sekou and 2020 unprotected 1st for Beal.
F*** it.
We're not likely starting Luke. Beal is a massive upgrade for us.
We're not likely playing Sekou at all. And who knows what he'll be in the future.
Andre Thon
Blake Kieff
Brown JJ
Beal Rose
RJ Frazier
Or we give them RJ and we keep Snell and LG
Andre Thon
Blake Kieff
Snell JJ
Beal LG
Rose Frazier
I'm bored. Dont kill me for reviving this thread
Gotta pay to get this guy.
F*** it.
We're not likely starting Luke. Beal is a massive upgrade for us.
We're not likely playing Sekou at all. And who knows what he'll be in the future.
Andre Thon
Blake Kieff
Brown JJ
Beal Rose
RJ Frazier
Or we give them RJ and we keep Snell and LG
Andre Thon
Blake Kieff
Snell JJ
Beal LG
Rose Frazier
I'm bored. Dont kill me for reviving this thread
Gotta pay to get this guy.
Re: Bradley Beal
- Manocad
- RealGM
- Posts: 69,969
- And1: 10,561
- Joined: Dec 13, 2005
- Location: Middle Fingerton
- Contact:
Re: Bradley Beal
Canadafan wrote:Snell LG Luke Sekou and 2020 unprotected 1st for Beal.
F*** it.
We're not likely starting Luke. Beal is a massive upgrade for us.
We're not likely playing Sekou at all. And who knows what he'll be in the future.
Andre Thon
Blake Kieff
Brown JJ
Beal Rose
RJ Frazier
Or we give them RJ and we keep Snell and LG
Andre Thon
Blake Kieff
Snell JJ
Beal LG
Rose Frazier
I'm bored. Dont kill me for reviving this thread
Gotta pay to get this guy.
Not to do the broken record thing, but I don’t see the point. I don’t see a championship roster there and obviously there’s no money left to build the team further. I get that some people would rather see a maxed out salary cap team that can win 48 games and get to the second round of the playoffs vs a maxed out salary cap team that wins 41 games and barely misses the playoffs or barely makes the playoffs and gets crushed in the first round. It would be one thing to add Beal, win 48 games, and lose in the 2nd round knowing that you had either salary cap space or trade assets to then make another step up the next year to a 53-55 win team that looks like a lock for a conference finals. I don’t see that as being an available scenario here, so give me the 41 wins, conservation of salary cap room/assets and higher draft pick option.
Simply put, building a team up via big steps followed by finishing touches baby steps works if you start that way. It doesn’t work if you’re paying out like you’ve got a nearly championship roster but are really a middle to low tier team; you get maybe one decent step (Beal) and no baby steps.
Tear it down, or in this case let it run its course out, and then start with the big steps followed by baby steps to finish it off.
Re: Bradley Beal
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,465
- And1: 1,261
- Joined: Jan 30, 2014
Re: Bradley Beal
I'll trade Sekou, Kennard, two unprotected 1st rounders for Beal without question. Our future would be building around Beal, Dre and Griffin!
Re: Bradley Beal
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,950
- And1: 1,442
- Joined: Nov 03, 2014
Re: Bradley Beal
Manocad wrote:Canadafan wrote:Snell LG Luke Sekou and 2020 unprotected 1st for Beal.
F*** it.
We're not likely starting Luke. Beal is a massive upgrade for us.
We're not likely playing Sekou at all. And who knows what he'll be in the future.
Andre Thon
Blake Kieff
Brown JJ
Beal Rose
RJ Frazier
Or we give them RJ and we keep Snell and LG
Andre Thon
Blake Kieff
Snell JJ
Beal LG
Rose Frazier
I'm bored. Dont kill me for reviving this thread
Gotta pay to get this guy.
Not to do the broken record thing, but I don’t see the point. I don’t see a championship roster there and obviously there’s no money left to build the team further. I get that some people would rather see a maxed out salary cap team that can win 48 games and get to the second round of the playoffs vs a maxed out salary cap team that wins 41 games and barely misses the playoffs or barely makes the playoffs and gets crushed in the first round. It would be one thing to add Beal, win 48 games, and lose in the 2nd round knowing that you had either salary cap space or trade assets to then make another step up the next year to a 53-55 win team that looks like a lock for a conference finals. I don’t see that as being an available scenario here, so give me the 41 wins, conservation of salary cap room/assets and higher draft pick option.
Simply put, building a team up via big steps followed by finishing touches baby steps works if you start that way. It doesn’t work if you’re paying out like you’ve got a nearly championship roster but are really a middle to low tier team; you get maybe one decent step (Beal) and no baby steps.
Tear it down, or in this case let it run its course out, and then start with the big steps followed by baby steps to finish it off.
Ya I hear ya.
Not sure what our cap outlook would look like but maybe we'd have some wiggle room to add a good SF and then use our bird rights to resign Dre and RJ.(something I'm not overly excited about)
Anyways. Sometimes I drink way too much coffee or booze lol and post my crazy thoughts. Hopefully ol eddy Stefanski has this **** figured out
Re: Bradley Beal
- BadMofoPimp
- RealGM
- Posts: 47,347
- And1: 11,574
- Joined: Oct 12, 2003
- Location: In the Paint
Re: Bradley Beal
Canadafan wrote:Manocad wrote:Canadafan wrote:Snell LG Luke Sekou and 2020 unprotected 1st for Beal.
F*** it.
We're not likely starting Luke. Beal is a massive upgrade for us.
We're not likely playing Sekou at all. And who knows what he'll be in the future.
Andre Thon
Blake Kieff
Brown JJ
Beal Rose
RJ Frazier
Or we give them RJ and we keep Snell and LG
Andre Thon
Blake Kieff
Snell JJ
Beal LG
Rose Frazier
I'm bored. Dont kill me for reviving this thread
Gotta pay to get this guy.
Not to do the broken record thing, but I don’t see the point. I don’t see a championship roster there and obviously there’s no money left to build the team further. I get that some people would rather see a maxed out salary cap team that can win 48 games and get to the second round of the playoffs vs a maxed out salary cap team that wins 41 games and barely misses the playoffs or barely makes the playoffs and gets crushed in the first round. It would be one thing to add Beal, win 48 games, and lose in the 2nd round knowing that you had either salary cap space or trade assets to then make another step up the next year to a 53-55 win team that looks like a lock for a conference finals. I don’t see that as being an available scenario here, so give me the 41 wins, conservation of salary cap room/assets and higher draft pick option.
Simply put, building a team up via big steps followed by finishing touches baby steps works if you start that way. It doesn’t work if you’re paying out like you’ve got a nearly championship roster but are really a middle to low tier team; you get maybe one decent step (Beal) and no baby steps.
Tear it down, or in this case let it run its course out, and then start with the big steps followed by baby steps to finish it off.
Ya I hear ya.
Not sure what our cap outlook would look like but maybe we'd have some wiggle room to add a good SF and then use our bird rights to resign Dre and RJ.(something I'm not overly excited about)
Anyways. Sometimes I drink way too much coffee or booze lol and post my crazy thoughts. Hopefully ol eddy Stefanski has this **** figured out
Manocad's belief is to try and be the worst team in the league and end up with a couple more Stanley Johnsons for a few years as that is the most likely outcome as per odds in sucking arse.
Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
Re: Bradley Beal
- Manocad
- RealGM
- Posts: 69,969
- And1: 10,561
- Joined: Dec 13, 2005
- Location: Middle Fingerton
- Contact:
Re: Bradley Beal
BadMofoPimp wrote:Canadafan wrote:Manocad wrote:Not to do the broken record thing, but I don’t see the point. I don’t see a championship roster there and obviously there’s no money left to build the team further. I get that some people would rather see a maxed out salary cap team that can win 48 games and get to the second round of the playoffs vs a maxed out salary cap team that wins 41 games and barely misses the playoffs or barely makes the playoffs and gets crushed in the first round. It would be one thing to add Beal, win 48 games, and lose in the 2nd round knowing that you had either salary cap space or trade assets to then make another step up the next year to a 53-55 win team that looks like a lock for a conference finals. I don’t see that as being an available scenario here, so give me the 41 wins, conservation of salary cap room/assets and higher draft pick option.
Simply put, building a team up via big steps followed by finishing touches baby steps works if you start that way. It doesn’t work if you’re paying out like you’ve got a nearly championship roster but are really a middle to low tier team; you get maybe one decent step (Beal) and no baby steps.
Tear it down, or in this case let it run its course out, and then start with the big steps followed by baby steps to finish it off.
Ya I hear ya.
Not sure what our cap outlook would look like but maybe we'd have some wiggle room to add a good SF and then use our bird rights to resign Dre and RJ.(something I'm not overly excited about)
Anyways. Sometimes I drink way too much coffee or booze lol and post my crazy thoughts. Hopefully ol eddy Stefanski has this **** figured out
Manocad's belief is to try and be the worst team in the league and end up with a couple more Stanley Johnsons for a few years as that is the most likely outcome as per odds in sucking arse.
Yeah, that’s exactly my belief as much as maxing out the salary cap and trading away draft picks every year is yours. You funny.
The mistake you’re making here is that this is not my ideology for every team no matter what. This is what I believe is the best route for THIS TEAM to take AT THIS POINT IN TIME. I’m not a “do anything to squeak into the playoffs every year no matter what” fan. I like championships.
Re: Bradley Beal
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,479
- And1: 2,546
- Joined: Aug 09, 2017
Re: Bradley Beal
I posted a deal where the Kings get Beal on the trade board for Ferrell, Bogdanovic, Bjelica and Hield
1. If Washington wanted more assets would the Pistons be open to adding an outgoing first to a Snell and Galloway for Bjelica and Bogdanovic swap as the third team?
2. If so, what protections?
1. If Washington wanted more assets would the Pistons be open to adding an outgoing first to a Snell and Galloway for Bjelica and Bogdanovic swap as the third team?
2. If so, what protections?
Re: Bradley Beal
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,113
- And1: 3,441
- Joined: Apr 19, 2010
- Location: Michigan
Re: Bradley Beal
NYG wrote:I posted a deal where the Kings get Beal on the trade board for Ferrell, Bogdanovic, Bjelica and Hield
1. If Washington wanted more assets would the Pistons be open to adding an outgoing first to a Snell and Galloway for Bjelica and Bogdanovic swap as the third team?
2. If so, what protections?
That's not terrible. We need a SF and both of those guys are above average role players.
Jackson/Rose/Frazier
Brown/Kennard/Thomas
Bogdanovic/Doumbouya/Mykhailiuk
Griffin/Bjelica/Maker
Drummond/Morris/Wood
I like that depth