Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
Moderators: Cowology, Snakebites, theBigLip, dVs33
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
- Snakebites
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 46,581
- And1: 14,769
- Joined: Jul 14, 2002
- Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
The coach and players aren’t in on the tank. We’re just really this bad.
The buyouts can’t have been great for team morale. Coaches and players don’t tank, but they do react when the front office throws in the towel. It’s hard to perform your best when you know there’s a vote of no confidence from higher up and they don’t even want you to win.
Waiving or giving away Dre, Reggie, and Morris is a pretty loud and clear message- you guys suck and we’d rather just lose more games.
Tanking is an ugly business. And it doesn’t always work. Still, it’s really the only possible way out of the pit we’ve been stuck in.
We clamored for it and it’s here. But yeah, not easy to see.
The buyouts can’t have been great for team morale. Coaches and players don’t tank, but they do react when the front office throws in the towel. It’s hard to perform your best when you know there’s a vote of no confidence from higher up and they don’t even want you to win.
Waiving or giving away Dre, Reggie, and Morris is a pretty loud and clear message- you guys suck and we’d rather just lose more games.
Tanking is an ugly business. And it doesn’t always work. Still, it’s really the only possible way out of the pit we’ve been stuck in.
We clamored for it and it’s here. But yeah, not easy to see.
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,977
- And1: 3,998
- Joined: Feb 26, 2005
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
Snakebites wrote:The coach and players aren’t in on the tank. We’re just really this bad.
The buyouts can’t have been great for team morale. Coaches and players don’t tank, but they do react when the front office throws in the towel. It’s hard to perform your best when you know there’s a vote of no confidence from higher up and they don’t even want you to win.
Waiving or giving away Dre, Reggie, and Morris is a pretty loud and clear message- you guys suck and we’d rather just lose more games.
Tanking is an ugly business. And it doesn’t always work. Still, it’s really the only possible way out of the pit we’ve been stuck in.
We clamored for it and it’s here. But yeah, not easy to see.
The only real part that stings is having a guy like Rose out there spending his final years on a team that doesn't want to win. Dude seemed super depressed in the post-game interview.
If he had asked for a trade I would have definitely felt better about the whole thing.
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
- Snakebites
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 46,581
- And1: 14,769
- Joined: Jul 14, 2002
- Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
BDM22 wrote:Snakebites wrote:The coach and players aren’t in on the tank. We’re just really this bad.
The buyouts can’t have been great for team morale. Coaches and players don’t tank, but they do react when the front office throws in the towel. It’s hard to perform your best when you know there’s a vote of no confidence from higher up and they don’t even want you to win.
Waiving or giving away Dre, Reggie, and Morris is a pretty loud and clear message- you guys suck and we’d rather just lose more games.
Tanking is an ugly business. And it doesn’t always work. Still, it’s really the only possible way out of the pit we’ve been stuck in.
We clamored for it and it’s here. But yeah, not easy to see.
The only real part that stings is having a guy like Rose out there spending his final years on a team that doesn't want to win. Dude seemed super depressed in the post-game interview.
If he had asked for a trade I would have definitely felt better about the whole thing.
Yeah, one has to wonder if he’d have felt the same way about staying if he knew the other moves that would be made.
Either way it’s just 25 games. Could very well be moved for peanuts in the offseason if that’s what he wants.
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,308
- And1: 969
- Joined: Jun 19, 2015
- Location: Roma
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
Casey is terrible.
You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Junior
- Posts: 450
- And1: 154
- Joined: Aug 09, 2012
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
What is it exactly Casey is doing to develop Sekou???
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,374
- And1: 1,314
- Joined: Nov 28, 2012
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
Jeff Van Gundy on his brother's Pistons: 'He took over the Titanic and it's sinking even quicker'
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,993
- And1: 1,463
- Joined: Nov 03, 2014
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
Snakebites wrote:BDM22 wrote:Snakebites wrote:The coach and players aren’t in on the tank. We’re just really this bad.
The buyouts can’t have been great for team morale. Coaches and players don’t tank, but they do react when the front office throws in the towel. It’s hard to perform your best when you know there’s a vote of no confidence from higher up and they don’t even want you to win.
Waiving or giving away Dre, Reggie, and Morris is a pretty loud and clear message- you guys suck and we’d rather just lose more games.
Tanking is an ugly business. And it doesn’t always work. Still, it’s really the only possible way out of the pit we’ve been stuck in.
We clamored for it and it’s here. But yeah, not easy to see.
The only real part that stings is having a guy like Rose out there spending his final years on a team that doesn't want to win. Dude seemed super depressed in the post-game interview.
If he had asked for a trade I would have definitely felt better about the whole thing.
Yeah, one has to wonder if he’d have felt the same way about staying if he knew the other moves that would be made.
Either way it’s just 25 games. Could very well be moved for peanuts in the offseason if that’s what he wants.
Ya I just felt like he had a little pull in staying. Probably didn't want to uproot midseason and hopefully we trade him end of season for a pick in this years draft
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,330
- And1: 21,884
- Joined: Oct 08, 2013
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
Starting to think they were trying to keep his stats down before FA but he still comes up big from the bench as well.
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
- Snakebites
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 46,581
- And1: 14,769
- Joined: Jul 14, 2002
- Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
MotownMadness wrote:
Starting to think they were trying to keep his stats down before FA but he still comes up bog from the bench as well.
Nah. He still got the most minutes as a big by far.
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Junior
- Posts: 282
- And1: 80
- Joined: Jul 13, 2017
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
Zero, nothing! Same confidence boost he gave Kennard. One mistake and Kennard was pulled. But 2nd round Brown has had 2 years of full support. Yet, other teams were only interested in 2 players.. Rose and Kennard. No team(s) lined up for Svi, Brown. But many on this forum think getting rid of Kennard is the future. Put Kennard on a good team and he is a key contributor, put Brown on a good team and he sits the bench.davidvolumes wrote:What is it exactly Casey is doing to develop Sekou???
Sent from my SM-A205U using RealGM mobile app
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Junior
- Posts: 450
- And1: 154
- Joined: Aug 09, 2012
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
In retrospect it seems to be a bad decision to have brought Sekou up from the g league. I see plenty of potential but he is still raw and what he needs is plenty of playing time. He needs to be drilled in every aspect of the fundamentals of the game. It doesn't appear he's getting the proper coaching at this level for whatever reason. He's jacking up threes like they're going out of style and since I've been watching him I have seen him shoot one mid-range jumper. I don't think it would be unreasonable to send him back down to the G League to take the pressure off him because this obviously isn't working for him. For one thing he's not receiving the ball where he's comfortable to make a move. Just my opinion
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,317
- And1: 2,377
- Joined: Sep 06, 2013
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
sludgefoot wrote:Zero, nothing! Same confidence boost he gave Kennard. One mistake and Kennard was pulled. But 2nd round Brown has had 2 years of full support. Yet, other teams were only interested in 2 players.. Rose and Kennard. No team(s) lined up for Svi, Brown. But many on this forum think getting rid of Kennard is the future. Put Kennard on a good team and he is a key contributor, put Brown on a good team and he sits the bench.davidvolumes wrote:What is it exactly Casey is doing to develop Sekou???
Sent from my SM-A205U using RealGM mobile app
Not sure what else you want from Sekou at this point. He's the youngest guy in the league and he's super raw. Once Casey put him in the rotation, he's been playing 24 mpg. When he gives good defensive effort, he gets more minutes.
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Junior
- Posts: 450
- And1: 154
- Joined: Aug 09, 2012
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
I just want to see him progress in his development.
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,374
- And1: 1,314
- Joined: Nov 28, 2012
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
I've been happy with Sekou overall for a 19 year old kid. I do think we brought him up from the G-league a little early in his development but I doubt it hurts him long-term. He is probably a little frustrated right now.
What is a better path for a rookie's development? Struggle in the NBA against better competition vs play well and build confidence in the G-league?
What is a better path for a rookie's development? Struggle in the NBA against better competition vs play well and build confidence in the G-league?
Jeff Van Gundy on his brother's Pistons: 'He took over the Titanic and it's sinking even quicker'
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,736
- And1: 813
- Joined: Dec 06, 2015
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
davidvolumes wrote:In retrospect it seems to be a bad decision to have brought Sekou up from the g league. I see plenty of potential but he is still raw and what he needs is plenty of playing time. He needs to be drilled in every aspect of the fundamentals of the game. It doesn't appear he's getting the proper coaching at this level for whatever reason. He's jacking up threes like they're going out of style and since I've been watching him I have seen him shoot one mid-range jumper. I don't think it would be unreasonable to send him back down to the G League to take the pressure off him because this obviously isn't working for him. For one thing he's not receiving the ball where he's comfortable to make a move. Just my opinion
Im really happy with the way Sekou plays bball. He is super raw but its great he doesnt consider shooting a mid-range. If he has the ball he should be shooting a 3 or driving to the basket. Once he figures out how to drive his length, speed and power will make it hard for people to stay in front of him.
If he was in GR no one can guard him, so he isnt going to be shooting mid-range shots. Just doing the same thing, firing away at 3s and driving, plus probably more fast break stuff since there are a lot of turn overs in the G league.
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,624
- And1: 1,350
- Joined: Jan 19, 2002
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
Sekou doesn't appear to be lacking confidence. He does appear to defer to the older players at times.
I think Casey is down with the tank. Seemed to me Wood got a "rest" right at the critical point in the 4th Q to lose the game. Maybe the team is going the route so many have wanted for so long?
I think Casey is down with the tank. Seemed to me Wood got a "rest" right at the critical point in the 4th Q to lose the game. Maybe the team is going the route so many have wanted for so long?
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,949
- And1: 653
- Joined: May 30, 2010
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
BDM22 wrote:Snakebites wrote:The coach and players aren’t in on the tank. We’re just really this bad.
The buyouts can’t have been great for team morale. Coaches and players don’t tank, but they do react when the front office throws in the towel. It’s hard to perform your best when you know there’s a vote of no confidence from higher up and they don’t even want you to win.
Waiving or giving away Dre, Reggie, and Morris is a pretty loud and clear message- you guys suck and we’d rather just lose more games.
Tanking is an ugly business. And it doesn’t always work. Still, it’s really the only possible way out of the pit we’ve been stuck in.
We clamored for it and it’s here. But yeah, not easy to see.
The only real part that stings is having a guy like Rose out there spending his final years on a team that doesn't want to win. Dude seemed super depressed in the post-game interview.
If he had asked for a trade I would have definitely felt better about the whole thing.
I don’t understand why he wanted to stay here. It’s not like he would’ve rode the bench for whoever traded for him. Ffs Reggie started for the clippers the other day..
RIP PALACE OF AUBURN HILLS
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,949
- And1: 653
- Joined: May 30, 2010
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
Moses ShamMoses wrote:I've been happy with Sekou overall for a 19 year old kid. I do think we brought him up from the G-league a little early in his development but I doubt it hurts him long-term. He is probably a little frustrated right now.
What is a better path for a rookie's development? Struggle in the NBA against better competition vs play well and build confidence in the G-league?
I’m not worried about Sekou either. Id rather him struggle a bit in the real game than dominate against weak competition. This is finally the perfect situation for developing players . He just needs positive reinforcement and the ability to play thru mistakes.
RIP PALACE OF AUBURN HILLS
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
- ComboGuardCity
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,580
- And1: 4,547
- Joined: Jul 10, 2010
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
24 minutes is plenty of time for as how bad Sekou has been playing. Letting players make mistakes doesn’t always result in learning from them...it can also instill bad habits.
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
- Pharaoh
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,096
- And1: 4,565
- Joined: Aug 10, 2001
Re: Game 59: Detroit Pistons (19-39) @ Portland Trail Blazers (25-32) - 9:00 PM ET
Coaches will always play guys who do the little things and get after it on defense.sludgefoot wrote:Zero, nothing! Same confidence boost he gave Kennard. One mistake and Kennard was pulled. But 2nd round Brown has had 2 years of full support. Yet, other teams were only interested in 2 players.. Rose and Kennard. No team(s) lined up for Svi, Brown. But many on this forum think getting rid of Kennard is the future. Put Kennard on a good team and he is a key contributor, put Brown on a good team and he sits the bench.davidvolumes wrote:What is it exactly Casey is doing to develop Sekou???
Sent from my SM-A205U using RealGM mobile app
There's a lot Brown needs to improve on but same goes for Luke, Sekou and everyone else.
Based on what I've seen Brown gets all the minutes he can handle due to his effort on both ends.
Sent from my SM-A520F using RealGM mobile app