thesack12 wrote:DetroitSho wrote:thesack12 wrote:
MANY people on this board incessantly talking about how much they'd rather have Grant over Wood and bashed anyone who thought otherwise. Grant and Wood were always going to be compared to each other moving forward.
MANY people of this board were crowning Grant to be a destined superstar after like 10 games. With Grant, people were even on here talking about Detroit being ready to compete after this upcoming draft.
As an important piece of a rotation, We've seen Grant contribute to winning for 1 season. This while being Denver's 4th or 5th best player. So let's not act like he has some kind of storied pedigree.
In Detroit, Grant has proven that he's not capable of elevating a team as a top option. He started out hot, but has been bad for 2 solid months now. Unless you solely want to count PPG which is a hollow stat in context of the entirety of the situation.
So yeah, when people start to downplay Wood's performance and effectiveness I don't think its out of bounds to bring up Grant.
This whole post is a flat out lie. It's just unbelievably untrue. Just, why lie to make a point?
Sent from my SM-N975U using
RealGM mobile app
Whatever you say bro.
Not whatever I say, it's what it is. NOBODY said Grant was a superstar. People were pleasantly surprised at his growth and praised Weaver for seeing what none of us saw. And at the same time, the conversation was around how much we could get in return for him with his value being high.
Please don't create fake arguing points. Everybody knows Grant is a high level #3. Wood is referred to as a Unicorn. One that apparently if you let leave out the door you're eternally damned. I would think the expectation would be slightly higher, no?
Sent from my SM-N975U using
RealGM mobile app