ImageImageImage

Bol Bol

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

User avatar
vege
RealGM
Posts: 20,823
And1: 4,799
Joined: Jul 18, 2008

Bol Bol 

Post#1 » by vege » Wed Jul 5, 2023 2:16 am

Orlando waived him, I have no idea why but move your sorry ass Weaver and go get him. The kid is good and deserves minutes in a NBA team. He could give us 20 mpg as PF, he is way better than Stewart.
LaSheed
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,910
And1: 829
Joined: Jun 02, 2016
       

Re: Bol Bol 

Post#2 » by LaSheed » Wed Jul 5, 2023 2:47 am

Yes from me. Crazy to me that he's still only 23
User avatar
vege
RealGM
Posts: 20,823
And1: 4,799
Joined: Jul 18, 2008

Re: Bol Bol 

Post#3 » by vege » Wed Jul 5, 2023 2:59 am

Before the ASG he was a beast in Orlando, I have no idea what happened after the ASG, but he is worth a shot. Worst case scenario he is much better than Bagley.
kellmellus50
Starter
Posts: 2,406
And1: 161
Joined: Dec 05, 2008

Re: Bol Bol 

Post#4 » by kellmellus50 » Wed Jul 5, 2023 3:05 am

pick him up ,and trade bagley for a 2nd
Defence Wins Championships,we need to return to the Bad Boy era.
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,710
And1: 9,545
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: Bol Bol 

Post#5 » by bstein14 » Wed Jul 5, 2023 3:39 am

He, much like Bagley, has a nice offensive skillset but his overall ability to contribute to winning basketball is lacking IMO. Signing him would likely come at the expense of Eugene at this point. Not sure if that's a win as we're trying to establish a new culture it feels like our window for Bol Bol may have passed us by.
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,443
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: Bol Bol 

Post#6 » by Pharaoh » Wed Jul 5, 2023 5:03 am

What's his cap hit? Cause we probably can't claim him off waivers without the space.

Once he's cleared waivers and is a free agent we could use part of the room exception for him

Sent from my SM-G781B using RealGM Forums mobile app
Kalamazoo317
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,322
And1: 2,289
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
   

Re: Bol Bol 

Post#7 » by Kalamazoo317 » Wed Jul 5, 2023 5:14 am

Yeah, part of my calculus in asking was "cheap flier." Sounds like his BBall IQ was pretty low in Orlando, though, and his outside shot wasn't as good as I thought it was.
Crymson
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,724
And1: 738
Joined: Apr 17, 2016

Re: Bol Bol 

Post#8 » by Crymson » Wed Jul 5, 2023 5:23 am

vege wrote:Orlando waived him, I have no idea why but move your sorry ass Weaver and go get him. The kid is good and deserves minutes in a NBA team. He could give us 20 mpg as PF, he is way better than Stewart.


He was waived instead of being kept at a measly $2.2m cap hit because he doesn't play defense or pass the ball and he can't shoot it either.
Kalamazoo317
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,322
And1: 2,289
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
   

Re: Bol Bol 

Post#9 » by Kalamazoo317 » Wed Jul 5, 2023 5:34 am

Crazy how big his hype was a few months ago to end up waived and treated like he's completely worthless now
https://www.theringer.com/nba/2022/11/29/23482975/bol-bol-orlando-magic
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 50,837
And1: 17,977
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: Bol Bol 

Post#10 » by Snakebites » Wed Jul 5, 2023 5:58 am

Sounds exactly like the sort of guy Weaver would take a flyer on, but he’s already taken a flyer on 2 other big men.

Plus the failed physical may have burned that bridge- players don’t like it when teams proclaim them to be damaged goods like that, even if it’s true.

If he truly was “way better than Stewart” he wouldn’t have gotten waived at 2.2 million. Stewart drew trade interest, remember.
User avatar
vege
RealGM
Posts: 20,823
And1: 4,799
Joined: Jul 18, 2008

Re: Bol Bol 

Post#11 » by vege » Wed Jul 5, 2023 6:07 am

Orlando dumped Tobias for expirings, they also traded Oladipo and Sabonis for 1 year of Ibaka, they have done stupid stuff in the past.

Bol Bol is not perfect, but he is better than Bagley and have way more upside than him. Stewart is a backup 5, not a 4 and not a starter.
Spider156
Head Coach
Posts: 6,613
And1: 1,421
Joined: Jul 25, 2010
       

Re: Bol Bol 

Post#12 » by Spider156 » Wed Jul 5, 2023 6:21 am

kellmellus50 wrote:pick him up ,and trade bagley for a 2nd

That’s the problem. Bagley is a negative asset and isn’t tradable unless you’re linking him with Bogan or Harris which I think might happen. More likely Killian leaves first before Bagley. Bagley is only 24. What’s crazy is how many contracts year players we have this year. Killian on paper looks pretty good with being a 21 year old expiring contract point guard that’s fit to guard 1-3. I mean I think he’s absolutely cooked trying to score the ball and he’s out of the league. But his expiring contract is valuable. Bagley is our worst contract in my opinion.
Defense wins championships
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,443
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: Bol Bol 

Post#13 » by Pharaoh » Wed Jul 5, 2023 7:12 am

Spider156 wrote:
kellmellus50 wrote:pick him up ,and trade bagley for a 2nd

That’s the problem. Bagley is a negative asset and isn’t tradable unless you’re linking him with Bogan or Harris which I think might happen. More likely Killian leaves first before Bagley. Bagley is only 24. What’s crazy is how many contracts year players we have this year. Killian on paper looks pretty good with being a 21 year old expiring contract point guard that’s fit to guard 1-3. I mean I think he’s absolutely cooked trying to score the ball and he’s out of the league. But his expiring contract is valuable. Bagley is our worst contract in my opinion.
Agree it's our worst but a 2 year deal worth approx 12 mil per isn't exactly a "bad" contract.

Sent from my SM-G781B using RealGM Forums mobile app
User avatar
Mr Peanut
Analyst
Posts: 3,301
And1: 3,868
Joined: Jan 29, 2012
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: Bol Bol 

Post#14 » by Mr Peanut » Wed Jul 5, 2023 11:43 am

HIs monthly stats last season are quite interesting:

Points/Rebounds/Blocks format

October: 10.9/6.7/2.4 on 65% FG
November: 14.2/8.3/1.7 on 58%
December: 10.3/6.1/1.1 on 57%
January: 7.1/4.4/1.0 on 51%
February: 5.9/3.8/0.8 on 57%
March: 3.3/4.2/0.6 on 42%
April: 9.7/6.0/1.0 on 31% (small sample size)

His minutes and production really fell off from January onwards and I'm not sure why. Fatigue? Injuries?

Anyway, I feel like we have enough project bigs on the team already without adding another. And Weaver may have burned his Bol Bol bridge with the previously rescinded trade.
User avatar
TPA
Pro Prospect
Posts: 912
And1: 641
Joined: Aug 13, 2008
Location: East Lansing
 

Re: Bol Bol 

Post#15 » by TPA » Wed Jul 5, 2023 12:43 pm

kellmellus50 wrote:pick him up ,and trade bagley for a 2nd

Did no team want Bol for a 2nd rounder? Would Bagley have that value at 5x the cost/yr. with 2 years remaining?
Orlando opted to re-sign Mo Wagner and Goga Bitadze instead of picking up Bol's 2.2mil.
Bol lost minutes over the course of the season with Orlando. Bad fit for their offense or defense? Something else?
Checking over at Orlando's forum, their fans aren't heartbroken to see Bol's departure.
Detroit has the right of first refusal with Bol's waiver.

edit: Bol is getting dragged HARD in the Bol topic on the General Board. "Way better than Stewart", eh?
User avatar
Uncle Mxy
General Manager
Posts: 9,506
And1: 2,245
Joined: Jul 14, 2004
Location: I plead the Fifth Dimension

Re: Bol Bol 

Post#16 » by Uncle Mxy » Wed Jul 5, 2023 12:58 pm

If only we could resolve the self-inflicted Manley Wisebag situation, I'd like to nab Bol Bol. *sigh*
Kalamazoo317
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,322
And1: 2,289
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
   

Re: Bol Bol 

Post#17 » by Kalamazoo317 » Wed Jul 5, 2023 1:11 pm

Spider156 wrote:
kellmellus50 wrote:pick him up ,and trade bagley for a 2nd

That’s the problem. Bagley is a negative asset and isn’t tradable unless you’re linking him with Bogan or Harris which I think might happen. More likely Killian leaves first before Bagley. Bagley is only 24. What’s crazy is how many contracts year players we have this year. Killian on paper looks pretty good with being a 21 year old expiring contract point guard that’s fit to guard 1-3. I mean I think he’s absolutely cooked trying to score the ball and he’s out of the league. But his expiring contract is valuable. Bagley is our worst contract in my opinion.


I think expiring contracts are about as valuable as cap space these days (which is to say not very). Everything is trades, usually with the star choosing their location, and the draft.
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 50,837
And1: 17,977
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: Bol Bol 

Post#18 » by Snakebites » Wed Jul 5, 2023 1:49 pm

vege wrote:Orlando dumped Tobias for expirings, they also traded Oladipo and Sabonis for 1 year of Ibaka, they have done stupid stuff in the past.

Bol Bol is not perfect, but he is better than Bagley and have way more upside than him. Stewart is a backup 5, not a 4 and not a starter.

Fair to point out that both of those bad trades were made by the same GM, a GM who was infamously bad and got fired five years ago.
theBigLip
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 16,837
And1: 3,432
Joined: May 22, 2001
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
       

Re: Bol Bol 

Post#19 » by theBigLip » Wed Jul 5, 2023 1:51 pm

I certainly wouldn’t consider him better than Stewart. And Orlando may not be the smartest team in the league, but if you’re only making $2M and get waived, you’re not a needle mover. I also don’t think he’s better than Bagley either. Easy pass - we have a full roster, especially w bigs.
Invictus88
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,927
And1: 2,207
Joined: Jun 25, 2013

Re: Bol Bol 

Post#20 » by Invictus88 » Wed Jul 5, 2023 2:16 pm

I don't want us to willingly acquire more low IQ / selfish basketball players. Hard pass.

Return to Detroit Pistons