Bol Bol
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
Re: Bol Bol
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,910
- And1: 829
- Joined: Jun 02, 2016
-
Re: Bol Bol
Yes from me. Crazy to me that he's still only 23
Re: Bol Bol
- vege
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,823
- And1: 4,799
- Joined: Jul 18, 2008
Re: Bol Bol
Before the ASG he was a beast in Orlando, I have no idea what happened after the ASG, but he is worth a shot. Worst case scenario he is much better than Bagley.
Re: Bol Bol
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,406
- And1: 161
- Joined: Dec 05, 2008
Re: Bol Bol
pick him up ,and trade bagley for a 2nd
Defence Wins Championships,we need to return to the Bad Boy era.
Re: Bol Bol
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,710
- And1: 9,545
- Joined: Jun 22, 2001
Re: Bol Bol
He, much like Bagley, has a nice offensive skillset but his overall ability to contribute to winning basketball is lacking IMO. Signing him would likely come at the expense of Eugene at this point. Not sure if that's a win as we're trying to establish a new culture it feels like our window for Bol Bol may have passed us by.
Re: Bol Bol
- Pharaoh
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,443
- And1: 4,742
- Joined: Aug 10, 2001
Re: Bol Bol
What's his cap hit? Cause we probably can't claim him off waivers without the space.
Once he's cleared waivers and is a free agent we could use part of the room exception for him
Sent from my SM-G781B using RealGM Forums mobile app
Once he's cleared waivers and is a free agent we could use part of the room exception for him
Sent from my SM-G781B using RealGM Forums mobile app
Re: Bol Bol
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,322
- And1: 2,289
- Joined: Nov 23, 2018
-
Re: Bol Bol
Yeah, part of my calculus in asking was "cheap flier." Sounds like his BBall IQ was pretty low in Orlando, though, and his outside shot wasn't as good as I thought it was.
Re: Bol Bol
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,724
- And1: 738
- Joined: Apr 17, 2016
Re: Bol Bol
vege wrote:Orlando waived him, I have no idea why but move your sorry ass Weaver and go get him. The kid is good and deserves minutes in a NBA team. He could give us 20 mpg as PF, he is way better than Stewart.
He was waived instead of being kept at a measly $2.2m cap hit because he doesn't play defense or pass the ball and he can't shoot it either.
Re: Bol Bol
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,322
- And1: 2,289
- Joined: Nov 23, 2018
-
Re: Bol Bol
Crazy how big his hype was a few months ago to end up waived and treated like he's completely worthless now
https://www.theringer.com/nba/2022/11/29/23482975/bol-bol-orlando-magic
https://www.theringer.com/nba/2022/11/29/23482975/bol-bol-orlando-magic
Re: Bol Bol
- Snakebites
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 50,837
- And1: 17,977
- Joined: Jul 14, 2002
- Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
-
Re: Bol Bol
Sounds exactly like the sort of guy Weaver would take a flyer on, but he’s already taken a flyer on 2 other big men.
Plus the failed physical may have burned that bridge- players don’t like it when teams proclaim them to be damaged goods like that, even if it’s true.
If he truly was “way better than Stewart” he wouldn’t have gotten waived at 2.2 million. Stewart drew trade interest, remember.
Plus the failed physical may have burned that bridge- players don’t like it when teams proclaim them to be damaged goods like that, even if it’s true.
If he truly was “way better than Stewart” he wouldn’t have gotten waived at 2.2 million. Stewart drew trade interest, remember.
Re: Bol Bol
- vege
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,823
- And1: 4,799
- Joined: Jul 18, 2008
Re: Bol Bol
Orlando dumped Tobias for expirings, they also traded Oladipo and Sabonis for 1 year of Ibaka, they have done stupid stuff in the past.
Bol Bol is not perfect, but he is better than Bagley and have way more upside than him. Stewart is a backup 5, not a 4 and not a starter.
Bol Bol is not perfect, but he is better than Bagley and have way more upside than him. Stewart is a backup 5, not a 4 and not a starter.
Re: Bol Bol
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,613
- And1: 1,421
- Joined: Jul 25, 2010
-
Re: Bol Bol
kellmellus50 wrote:pick him up ,and trade bagley for a 2nd
That’s the problem. Bagley is a negative asset and isn’t tradable unless you’re linking him with Bogan or Harris which I think might happen. More likely Killian leaves first before Bagley. Bagley is only 24. What’s crazy is how many contracts year players we have this year. Killian on paper looks pretty good with being a 21 year old expiring contract point guard that’s fit to guard 1-3. I mean I think he’s absolutely cooked trying to score the ball and he’s out of the league. But his expiring contract is valuable. Bagley is our worst contract in my opinion.
Defense wins championships
Re: Bol Bol
- Pharaoh
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,443
- And1: 4,742
- Joined: Aug 10, 2001
Re: Bol Bol
Agree it's our worst but a 2 year deal worth approx 12 mil per isn't exactly a "bad" contract.Spider156 wrote:kellmellus50 wrote:pick him up ,and trade bagley for a 2nd
That’s the problem. Bagley is a negative asset and isn’t tradable unless you’re linking him with Bogan or Harris which I think might happen. More likely Killian leaves first before Bagley. Bagley is only 24. What’s crazy is how many contracts year players we have this year. Killian on paper looks pretty good with being a 21 year old expiring contract point guard that’s fit to guard 1-3. I mean I think he’s absolutely cooked trying to score the ball and he’s out of the league. But his expiring contract is valuable. Bagley is our worst contract in my opinion.
Sent from my SM-G781B using RealGM Forums mobile app
Re: Bol Bol
- Mr Peanut
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,301
- And1: 3,868
- Joined: Jan 29, 2012
- Location: New Zealand
-
Re: Bol Bol
HIs monthly stats last season are quite interesting:
Points/Rebounds/Blocks format
October: 10.9/6.7/2.4 on 65% FG
November: 14.2/8.3/1.7 on 58%
December: 10.3/6.1/1.1 on 57%
January: 7.1/4.4/1.0 on 51%
February: 5.9/3.8/0.8 on 57%
March: 3.3/4.2/0.6 on 42%
April: 9.7/6.0/1.0 on 31% (small sample size)
His minutes and production really fell off from January onwards and I'm not sure why. Fatigue? Injuries?
Anyway, I feel like we have enough project bigs on the team already without adding another. And Weaver may have burned his Bol Bol bridge with the previously rescinded trade.
Points/Rebounds/Blocks format
October: 10.9/6.7/2.4 on 65% FG
November: 14.2/8.3/1.7 on 58%
December: 10.3/6.1/1.1 on 57%
January: 7.1/4.4/1.0 on 51%
February: 5.9/3.8/0.8 on 57%
March: 3.3/4.2/0.6 on 42%
April: 9.7/6.0/1.0 on 31% (small sample size)
His minutes and production really fell off from January onwards and I'm not sure why. Fatigue? Injuries?
Anyway, I feel like we have enough project bigs on the team already without adding another. And Weaver may have burned his Bol Bol bridge with the previously rescinded trade.
Re: Bol Bol
- TPA
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 912
- And1: 641
- Joined: Aug 13, 2008
- Location: East Lansing
-
Re: Bol Bol
kellmellus50 wrote:pick him up ,and trade bagley for a 2nd
Did no team want Bol for a 2nd rounder? Would Bagley have that value at 5x the cost/yr. with 2 years remaining?
Orlando opted to re-sign Mo Wagner and Goga Bitadze instead of picking up Bol's 2.2mil.
Bol lost minutes over the course of the season with Orlando. Bad fit for their offense or defense? Something else?
Checking over at Orlando's forum, their fans aren't heartbroken to see Bol's departure.
Detroit has the right of first refusal with Bol's waiver.
edit: Bol is getting dragged HARD in the Bol topic on the General Board. "Way better than Stewart", eh?
Re: Bol Bol
- Uncle Mxy
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,506
- And1: 2,245
- Joined: Jul 14, 2004
- Location: I plead the Fifth Dimension
Re: Bol Bol
If only we could resolve the self-inflicted Manley Wisebag situation, I'd like to nab Bol Bol. *sigh*
Re: Bol Bol
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,322
- And1: 2,289
- Joined: Nov 23, 2018
-
Re: Bol Bol
Spider156 wrote:kellmellus50 wrote:pick him up ,and trade bagley for a 2nd
That’s the problem. Bagley is a negative asset and isn’t tradable unless you’re linking him with Bogan or Harris which I think might happen. More likely Killian leaves first before Bagley. Bagley is only 24. What’s crazy is how many contracts year players we have this year. Killian on paper looks pretty good with being a 21 year old expiring contract point guard that’s fit to guard 1-3. I mean I think he’s absolutely cooked trying to score the ball and he’s out of the league. But his expiring contract is valuable. Bagley is our worst contract in my opinion.
I think expiring contracts are about as valuable as cap space these days (which is to say not very). Everything is trades, usually with the star choosing their location, and the draft.
Re: Bol Bol
- Snakebites
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 50,837
- And1: 17,977
- Joined: Jul 14, 2002
- Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
-
Re: Bol Bol
vege wrote:Orlando dumped Tobias for expirings, they also traded Oladipo and Sabonis for 1 year of Ibaka, they have done stupid stuff in the past.
Bol Bol is not perfect, but he is better than Bagley and have way more upside than him. Stewart is a backup 5, not a 4 and not a starter.
Fair to point out that both of those bad trades were made by the same GM, a GM who was infamously bad and got fired five years ago.
Re: Bol Bol
-
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 16,837
- And1: 3,432
- Joined: May 22, 2001
- Location: Santa Cruz, CA
-
Re: Bol Bol
I certainly wouldn’t consider him better than Stewart. And Orlando may not be the smartest team in the league, but if you’re only making $2M and get waived, you’re not a needle mover. I also don’t think he’s better than Bagley either. Easy pass - we have a full roster, especially w bigs.
Re: Bol Bol
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,927
- And1: 2,207
- Joined: Jun 25, 2013
Re: Bol Bol
I don't want us to willingly acquire more low IQ / selfish basketball players. Hard pass.