RealGM

This poll makes more sense with more choices

under 20 games
25-30 games
30-35 games
35-40 games
40-45 games
45-50 games
50-55 games
over 55 games

So if I think it’s 30 which option do I choose?

If I think it’s between 20 and 25 which do I choose?

Number ranges need fixing.

And where's the 21-24 slot? 24 wins is a 10 win improvement and probably about where we end up, imo

Kalamazoo317 wrote:And where's the 21-24 slot? 24 wins is a 10 win improvement and probably about where we end up, imo

21 to 24 is not allowed they will do better than that

Snakebites wrote:So if I think it’s 30 which option do I choose?

If I think it’s between 20 and 25 which do I choose?

Number ranges need fixing.

21 to 24 is not allowed they will do better than that
you have 2 options pick 1
25-30 games
30-35 games

kellmellus50 wrote:

Kalamazoo317 wrote:And where's the 21-24 slot? 24 wins is a 10 win improvement and probably about where we end up, imo

21 to 24 is not allowed they will do better than that

Yet under 20 is an option? And over 55?

Piston Pete wrote:

kellmellus50 wrote:

Kalamazoo317 wrote:And where's the 21-24 slot? 24 wins is a 10 win improvement and probably about where we end up, imo

21 to 24 is not allowed they will do better than that

Yet under 20 is an option?

Seriously. If you want this to be a good poll please have range options that include everything. There shouldn’t be a range of numbers that just aren’t allowed because you don’t think it’s good.

And make them unambiguous. It should be, for instance- one option for 25-29 and one for 30-34, then one for 35 to 39 and so on.

Snakebites wrote:

Piston Pete wrote:

kellmellus50 wrote: 21 to 24 is not allowed they will do better than that

Yet under 20 is an option?

Seriously. If you want this to be a good poll please have range options that include everything. There shouldn’t be a range of numbers that just aren’t allowed because you don’t think it’s good.

And make them unambiguous. It should be, for instance- one option for 25-29 and one for 30-34, then one for 35 to 39 and so on.

i allowed under 20 for the crazy people

Seriously the other poll that up did not allow over 34 wins or under 20 wins and you did not complain

This is my poll i can do anything i want !!! lol
if you don't like my poll go to the other poll or make another one up that you like,and then i get to complain.

Between obsessing over centers and making polls with holes in them, you’re an interesting poster for sure.

I protest voted the under 20 category

Over 55? Ain't no way, unless some kind of insane trade is made. Hell, I feel that way about 40 wins.

zeebneeb wrote:Over 55? Ain't no way, unless some kind of insane trade is made. Hell, I feel that way about 40 wins.

These teams show that it can be done below:
2007-08 Boston Celtics – 42-wins turnaround · 1997-98 San Antonio Spurs turnaround– 36 wins · 1989-90 San Antonio Spurs turnaround – 35 wins · 2004-05 Phoenix Suns – 33 wins turnaround ...

1997-98 San Antonio Spurs, who went from 20 – 62 the season prior to 56-26 the next. Boston went 24-58 in 2006-07, gave the Celtics a 60-15 record so far that season (they would finish 66-16,

"This poll makes more sense with more choices"

Proceeds to leave out 21-24 wins, crosses over all the categories with the same number, and has half the options with categories of 40+ wins which is clearly not going to happen.

Mr Peanut wrote:"This poll makes more sense with more choices"

Proceeds to leave out 21-24 wins, crosses over all the categories with the same number, and has half the options with categories of 40+ wins which is clearly not going to happen.

i make polls interesting, not the same ole same

kellmellus50 wrote:

Mr Peanut wrote:"This poll makes more sense with more choices"

Proceeds to leave out 21-24 wins, crosses over all the categories with the same number, and has half the options with categories of 40+ wins which is clearly not going to happen.

i make polls interesting, not the same ole same

Sometimes the road more traveled is more traveled for a good reason...

Snakebites wrote:

kellmellus50 wrote:

Mr Peanut wrote:"This poll makes more sense with more choices"

Proceeds to leave out 21-24 wins, crosses over all the categories with the same number, and has half the options with categories of 40+ wins which is clearly not going to happen.

i make polls interesting, not the same ole same

Sometimes the road more traveled is more traveled for a good reason...

Yes,if the good reason is your talking about getting knookie than i understand , i'll travel that road every day to that hotel.

30-35 if everything goes pretty good. 25-30 should be pretty easy

62-20

25 sounds right.

Piston Pete wrote:62-20

I like these odds you take 62 and over ill take 61 and under for 1,000.00 cash only ,
we can meet at MGM for payment will you take my bet ?