Snakebites wrote:Discuss away.
Previous one should have been locked a long time ago when it passed 100 pages.
link to the last page of the last thread: viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2030814&start=2400
Moderators: Cowology, dVs33, theBigLip, Snakebites
Snakebites wrote:Discuss away.
Previous one should have been locked a long time ago when it passed 100 pages.
Kalamazoo317 wrote:Are 100+ page threads hard on the system or something?
ComboGuardCity wrote:I think Weaver getting another year would’ve been interesting. Grimes is a great player and proving it wasn’t a fluke. Who knows if Troy would’ve turned a corner or traded for and stretched a few guys. We’ll never know.

Mr Peanut wrote:It seems like Grimes was actually a good return for the Bojan/Burks trade but unfortunately he was largely injured when we had him and then decided he didn't want to be in Detroit.

Snakebites wrote:I get why people like to rewrite history on the latter half of Dumars executive career with the Pistons. He’s a Hall of Famer and All Time Piston great as a player who built our title team. If there’s a Mount Rushmore for Piston history- he’s on it. And his time was a long time ago, so I get why some might want to gloss over how bad he was with personnel moves post 2006 or so.
But I struggle to grasp the revisionist history going on with Troy Weaver. Dude was bad. He did a bad job. And it was recent. We all saw it.

tmorgan wrote:Snakebites wrote:I get why people like to rewrite history on the latter half of Dumars executive career with the Pistons. He’s a Hall of Famer and All Time Piston great as a player who built our title team. If there’s a Mount Rushmore for Piston history- he’s on it. And his time was a long time ago, so I get why some might want to gloss over how bad he was with personnel moves post 2006 or so.
But I struggle to grasp the revisionist history going on with Troy Weaver. Dude was bad. He did a bad job. And it was recent. We all saw it.
I still think it’s just a matter of over-promotion. He’s fine as a head scout or draft manager. His role in OKC behind Presti suited him, but he wanted a bigger opportunity and got it… and sucked.
Now why New Orleans can’t see this is beyond me. Bad times are a coming for the Pelicans even though they have interesting talent.
ComboGuardCity wrote:I think Weaver getting another year would’ve been interesting. Who knows if Troy would’ve turned a corner or traded for and stretched a few guys. We’ll never know.

Yep, it's The Peter Principle in effect.tmorgan wrote:Snakebites wrote:I get why people like to rewrite history on the latter half of Dumars executive career with the Pistons. He’s a Hall of Famer and All Time Piston great as a player who built our title team. If there’s a Mount Rushmore for Piston history- he’s on it. And his time was a long time ago, so I get why some might want to gloss over how bad he was with personnel moves post 2006 or so.
But I struggle to grasp the revisionist history going on with Troy Weaver. Dude was bad. He did a bad job. And it was recent. We all saw it.
I still think it’s just a matter of over-promotion. He’s fine as a head scout or draft manager. His role in OKC behind Presti suited him, but he wanted a bigger opportunity and got it… and sucked.
Now why New Orleans can’t see this is beyond me. Bad times are a coming for the Pelicans even though they have interesting talent.


MotownMadness wrote:Pelicans are 0-6 and Dumars traded their pick unprotected
Snakebites wrote:MotownMadness wrote:Pelicans are 0-6 and Dumars traded their pick unprotected
It's actually worse than that.
They gave up their 2026 unprotected pick along with the 23rd pick to get Queen, who is barely playing.
How did they get the 23rd pick to begin with? Well, they used to own the Pacers 2026 pick- they traded it back to the Pacers to get the 23rd pick in this draft. Immediately after that Haliburton got hurt and the value of that pick skyrocketed.
They gave up 2 potentially lottery valued picks to get Queen- including one that is completely unprotected. And Queen is playing 17 minutes per game off the bench.
It's just wild, wild work.

MotownMadness wrote:Snakebites wrote:MotownMadness wrote:Pelicans are 0-6 and Dumars traded their pick unprotected
It's actually worse than that.
They gave up their 2026 unprotected pick along with the 23rd pick to get Queen, who is barely playing.
How did they get the 23rd pick to begin with? Well, they used to own the Pacers 2026 pick- they traded it back to the Pacers to get the 23rd pick in this draft. Immediately after that Haliburton got hurt and the value of that pick skyrocketed.
They gave up 2 potentially lottery valued picks to get Queen- including one that is completely unprotected. And Queen is playing 17 minutes per game off the bench.
It's just wild, wild work.
That’s insane