Alex Smith vs. JaMarcus Russell

Who will be better?

 
Total votes: 0

gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 32,352
And1: 3,749
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Alex Smith vs. JaMarcus Russell 

Post#1 » by gswhoops » Wed May 9, 2007 1:53 pm

Which one would you rather build a franchise around? Which one do you think will become a better QB?

Just curious because they're both young, were both #1 picks, and both play in the Bay.
User avatar
JoeyH
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,842
And1: 17
Joined: Jun 30, 2005

 

Post#2 » by JoeyH » Wed May 9, 2007 8:47 pm

lol I love that avatar.

The answer for me is J-Marc. All day.
Monkeyfeng06
Banned User
Posts: 19,810
And1: 6
Joined: Jul 20, 2005

 

Post#3 » by Monkeyfeng06 » Wed May 9, 2007 9:00 pm

JaMarcus Russell
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 43,011
And1: 18,087
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

 

Post#4 » by NO-KG-AI » Wed May 9, 2007 10:27 pm

Russell. I think Alex Smith got lucky that the QB's in his class were garbage.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
User avatar
Elway=GOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,475
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 01, 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ

 

Post#5 » by Elway=GOAT » Thu May 10, 2007 9:53 am

Alex Smith...I think he is just the smarter of the 2. Better decision maker and more accurate. Russell has the stronger arm, and more physical talent obviously, but so did Ryan Leaf and Jeff George.

Russell is going to be a bust, Smith has already shown that he is a capable QB. I dont believe the Raiders will surround Russell with the talent he needs to succeed. He is not the type who can scramble and make plays with his feet first of all. I see him as another Byron Leftwhich. Guy with a big arm, who is going to get crushed, because he has no ability to move in the pocket.

His downfall will be the Raiders and Al Davis. Smith will go down with the better legacy, because the niners have shown in recent years, they know how to buld a team, atleast have an idea of it. Ontop of that, the Raiders play in a division with teams, who will always be solid, the Niners do not.


EDIT: Cutler will be better than both
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 43,011
And1: 18,087
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

 

Post#6 » by NO-KG-AI » Thu May 10, 2007 7:35 pm

Elway=GOAT wrote:Alex Smith...I think he is just the smarter of the 2. Better decision maker and more accurate. Russell has the stronger arm, and more physical talent obviously, but so did Ryan Leaf and Jeff George.

Russell is going to be a bust, Smith has already shown that he is a capable QB. I dont believe the Raiders will surround Russell with the talent he needs to succeed. He is not the type who can scramble and make plays with his feet first of all. I see him as another Byron Leftwhich. Guy with a big arm, who is going to get crushed, because he has no ability to move in the pocket.

His downfall will be the Raiders and Al Davis. Smith will go down with the better legacy, because the niners have shown in recent years, they know how to buld a team, atleast have an idea of it. Ontop of that, the Raiders play in a division with teams, who will always be solid, the Niners do not.


EDIT: Cutler will be better than both


Says the guy who obviously knows nothing about Russell. Can't move in the pocket? That's a joke right? Not accurate? Rofl.

Their are a few differences between Russell and Leftwich:

1) Russell has an even stronger arm

2) Russell is much more mobile (not Mcnabb or Culpepper mobile, but about like Big Ben)

3) Russell has a lighting quick release, and can get the ball 50-60 yard with a flick of the wrist, he doesn't have the long wind up of Leftwich.

I'll give you that the Raiders probably won't put a great core around him, but Alex Smith's field smarts are way overrated.

Russell has proven he can run a pro style offense at an extremely high level, their is no reason that won't translate, and he improved immensely every year.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
User avatar
Pierce 4 3
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,710
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Location: Wherever there is money to steal

 

Post#7 » by Pierce 4 3 » Thu May 10, 2007 9:38 pm

russell all the way
User avatar
UKF
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,810
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 05, 2006
Contact:

 

Post#8 » by UKF » Fri May 11, 2007 1:17 am

ill say russel and im a niner fan. but you never can know these things, im gunna strictly on physical atributes.
User avatar
Elway=GOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,475
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 01, 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ

 

Post#9 » by Elway=GOAT » Fri May 11, 2007 5:40 am

NO-KG-AI wrote:
Elway=GOAT wrote:Alex Smith...I think he is just the smarter of the 2. Better decision maker and more accurate. Russell has the stronger arm, and more physical talent obviously, but so did Ryan Leaf and Jeff George.

Russell is going to be a bust, Smith has already shown that he is a capable QB. I dont believe the Raiders will surround Russell with the talent he needs to succeed. He is not the type who can scramble and make plays with his feet first of all. I see him as another Byron Leftwhich. Guy with a big arm, who is going to get crushed, because he has no ability to move in the pocket.

His downfall will be the Raiders and Al Davis. Smith will go down with the better legacy, because the niners have shown in recent years, they know how to buld a team, atleast have an idea of it. Ontop of that, the Raiders play in a division with teams, who will always be solid, the Niners do not.


EDIT: Cutler will be better than both


Says the guy who obviously knows nothing about Russell. Can't move in the pocket? That's a joke right? Not accurate? Rofl.

Their are a few differences between Russell and Leftwich:

1) Russell has an even stronger arm

2) Russell is much more mobile (not Mcnabb or Culpepper mobile, but about like Big Ben)

3) Russell has a lighting quick release, and can get the ball 50-60 yard with a flick of the wrist, he doesn't have the long wind up of Leftwich.

I'll give you that the Raiders probably won't put a great core around him, but Alex Smith's field smarts are way overrated.

Russell has proven he can run a pro style offense at an extremely high level, their is no reason that won't translate, and he improved immensely every year.


First, I never said Russell isnt accurate...I said Smith is more accurate. Russell is not a mobel QB. He is somewhere between leftwhich and big ben. Which is going to get him nowhere in the pros, atleast for the next couple years. He is going to be a sitting duck back there. Alot of QB's have played in pro style offenses and flopped. I think Russell will, be just another bust. Especially playing in the division that he currently is in now.

I dont care how far a guy can throw the ball, or how quick his release is. If that was a factor in anything important, Mike Vick and Kyle Bollar would be the best QB's in the league, and Ryan Leaf and Jeff George would be hall of famers. It means absolutly nothing. Russell will bust. 3 years from now when the Raiders still have the first pick, and are taking another QB because the utter failure of Russell. I hope you remember me and this post.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 43,011
And1: 18,087
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

 

Post#10 » by NO-KG-AI » Fri May 11, 2007 8:46 am

I can see him busting, but not for the reasons that you do.

Quick release makes a WORLD of a difference, it is basically keeping Leftwich from being elite.

Jamarcus is more mobile than you think obviously, he will be able to scramble for some yards, about like Big Ben, like I said. Not a real threat, but enough to buy time.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
User avatar
Elway=GOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,475
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 01, 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ

 

Post#11 » by Elway=GOAT » Sat May 12, 2007 2:44 am

NO-KG-AI wrote:I can see him busting, but not for the reasons that you do.

Quick release makes a WORLD of a difference, it is basically keeping Leftwich from being elite.

Jamarcus is more mobile than you think obviously, he will be able to scramble for some yards, about like Big Ben, like I said. Not a real threat, but enough to buy time.


Now dont get me wrong, I dont think he is a Bledsoe where he is a sitting duck. But I think he is going to have a very hard time in the pro's especially with the shittyness of the Raiders Oline. That is the main reason. I always believe no matter how talented a players arm is, or his physical gifts, hes only going to be as good as his line and specialist players. That is why I believe John Elway to be the best of all time at the position. He put teams on his back that should been battling for top 5 picks every year and took them to the superbowl.

He is the only QB I have ever seen litterally take a poor supporting cast put them on his back all the way to the superbowl. Now they got blown out the pre-shannhan superbowl teams, but he took them there. I dont even think Elway could save this Raiders team. Which is going to be Russells ultimate downfall.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 43,011
And1: 18,087
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

 

Post#12 » by NO-KG-AI » Sat May 12, 2007 3:46 am

Well, John Elway's quick release was a big part of his success, it can keep you from getting murdered.

I agree about the o-line, Aaron Brooks is very fast, and even he couldn't make a difference with his speed.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"

Return to Player Comparisons