Page 1 of 1
TO vs. Ocho Cinco
Posted: Sat Sep 1, 2007 1:10 am
by kooldude
Who's better?
Posted: Sat Sep 1, 2007 2:46 am
by Monkeyfeng06
Ocho Cinco.
Posted: Sat Sep 1, 2007 6:58 pm
by El Turco
chad
Posted: Sat Sep 1, 2007 10:14 pm
by NO-KG-AI
TO is a better receiver. I'll still take Chad 10 times out of 10.
Posted: Sat Sep 1, 2007 10:53 pm
by thierry
NO-KG-AI wrote:TO is a better receiver. I'll still take Chad 10 times out of 10.
Yep.
Posted: Sun Sep 2, 2007 5:47 pm
by The_Child_Prodigy
Wasnt TO a league leader in drops?
Ocho Cinco its not close
Posted: Sun Sep 2, 2007 6:11 pm
by NeedsMoreCheese
The_Child_Prodigy wrote:Wasnt TO a league leader in drops?
Ocho Cinco its not close
Yea but when youre playing with a torn ligament these things happen. Didnt he also lead the league in TD catches or something?
Posted: Sun Sep 2, 2007 7:27 pm
by NO-KG-AI
I think Chad is great, but he is a bit overrated IMO.
He has never put together a season where he made you say "wow" or where I actually felt he was the best receiver, yet he gets tagged with that a lot.
He has never had 100 catches, he's hit 10 TD's once(10 exactly), and his career high is 1432 yards.
HE's a solid top receiver in the game, but TO was ARGUABLY the top receiver in the game, and I have never felt there was a compelling argument for Chad.
Right now, I would take Chad, but I still think TO is a tad better, but meh.
Posted: Sun Sep 2, 2007 9:40 pm
by captain_cheapseats
You basically have the best guy against single coverage in the NFL (Johnson) against the guy who is the best at beating multiple defenders in the NFL (TO).** So I guess it just depends on what you need. If you have a good group of receivers, Johnson is great because his impressive all-around skill set guarantees no one can take him 1 vs. 1, and you need to have help sent his way. But if you had a **** group of WRs, TO would be best. He is impossible to jam at the line, and amazing at using his size to always get the 1st shot at the football, so double teams don't seem to really affect his game as much as other WRs. I guess if forced to choose I'd say Johnson, because his versatility guarantees every team could use him effectively. But for certain teams, particularly those without a lot of other threats, you'd want TO and his ability to be a one man offense.
**As a side note, IMO Holt is best against zone coverage.
Re: TO vs. Ocho Cinco
Posted: Fri Aug 8, 2008 8:09 pm
by etopn23
^^ Maybe if Randy Moss wasn't in the league.
Re: TO vs. Ocho Cinco
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 8:28 pm
by cowboys4life
T.O all the way
hes done much more in his career then Chad has
Re: TO vs. Ocho Cinco
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 4:48 pm
by Ong_dynasty
I like chad!!But I never ever once thought you can consider him the best receiver or a H-O-F receiver...While T.O you can..
Chad is there and there abouts..
But I think T.O is up there.
****COMING FROM AN EAGLES FAN*******
Re: TO vs. Ocho Cinco
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:02 am
by Cevap
T.O. I'd prolly take Terrell over Randy too (not a boys fan)