trade the #1 to Tampa Bay for #4 and their 2nd and 3rd rounders????
makes too much sense......they can still get Russell at #4 and pick up some extra picks!!!!!!!!!!!!
Now, if they want CJ, that's a different story...but regardless, this is what they should do.
Why doesn't Oakland?
Moderator: studcrackers
Why doesn't Oakland?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,496
- And1: 99
- Joined: Nov 20, 2001
- Location: Budapest, Hungary
- Pierce 4 3
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,710
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 09, 2007
- Location: Wherever there is money to steal
- Pierce 4 3
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,710
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 09, 2007
- Location: Wherever there is money to steal
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,399
- And1: 6,016
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
shagadelic45 wrote:CLE has all but said they are taking Quinn......and he actually WANTS to play for CLE and no one else
Phil Savage (Browns' GM) has also had his eye on Russell since he was 16 years old...I think if by some chance Russell is still on the board #3 the Browns would take all of 15 seconds to pick him.
-
- NFL Analyst
- Posts: 16,964
- And1: 129
- Joined: Apr 30, 2001
- Location: Back in the 616
- Contact:
-
Browns would love to get Russell at #3, they wouldn't even hesitate to take him over Quinn or Peterson.
If by some freak occurence Russell is not taken #1, then I strongly believe the Lions take him.
And once again, why would Tampa, a team with several major holes, have any motivation to trade away picks that are almost certain to produce immediate starters to get just one guy? Johnson is going to be very good, but you don't deal your draft away for a WR, period.
If by some freak occurence Russell is not taken #1, then I strongly believe the Lions take him.
And once again, why would Tampa, a team with several major holes, have any motivation to trade away picks that are almost certain to produce immediate starters to get just one guy? Johnson is going to be very good, but you don't deal your draft away for a WR, period.