Week 8 rankings-- New #1!- also first BCS

Moderator: studcrackers

User avatar
Posey H8er
RealGM
Posts: 20,095
And1: 64
Joined: Jan 07, 2007

Re: Week 8 rankings-- New #1!- also first BCS 

Post#21 » by Posey H8er » Sat Oct 24, 2009 7:41 pm

LAKESHOW wrote:
mattbulls wrote:
LAKESHOW wrote:this is simply INCREDIBLE. #7. this is utterly ridiculous. multiply iowa, boise and cincinnati by 1000 and USC would kill those teams by 70pts . . . BY HALFTIME!!

this is sh**


Have you seen Iowa's D?


is that a requirement? or would that be like watching saw1, saw2, saw3, saw4, saw5 etc...

in other words, isnt an awesome big10 defense this year, the same version as the last 5?

just curious, in case there was something new that i missed this year.

If USC could stop losing against crummy unranked opponents then perhaps they should be ranked higher. But that's not the case.

And Iowa's defense is pretty darn good. They have two mid-season All Americans (Pat Angerer and Tyler Sash) and lead the nation in interceptions.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 43,956
And1: 19,781
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

Re: Week 8 rankings-- New #1!- also first BCS 

Post#22 » by NO-KG-AI » Sun Oct 25, 2009 1:35 am

Posey H8er wrote:If USC could stop losing against crummy unranked opponents then perhaps they should be ranked higher. But that's not the case.



This happens yearly, all they have to do is spank Ohio State like every top team does, and then cruise through their easy schedule, and they would be a shoe in, because they are USC. Dunno why we have to have this discussion yearly, or why we call it an "upset" when we can predict it happening :lol:
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"

Return to NCAA Football