RealGM

Latrell wrote: there are no completely useless teams like Rutgers in the SEC.

did they finally relegate kentucky and vanderbilt to fcs?

at least rutgers strung together couple winning seasons few years ago, i dont remember the last time kentucky played in a bowl.

Arda K wrote:

Latrell wrote: there are no completely useless teams like Rutgers in the SEC.

did they finally relegate kentucky and vanderbilt to fcs?

at least rutgers strung together couple winning seasons few years ago, i dont remember the last time kentucky played in a bowl.

Well there can't be only good teams in a conference. Someone has to come in last.

And Vanderbilt's defense is actually decent.

And Kentucky is 5-3 this year..

well there are bad programs and then there are kentucky and kansas.

good on them for finally getting a chance to finish above .500 first time in a decade.

Latrell wrote:

Arda K wrote:

Latrell wrote: there are no completely useless teams like Rutgers in the SEC.

did they finally relegate kentucky and vanderbilt to fcs?

at least rutgers strung together couple winning seasons few years ago, i dont remember the last time kentucky played in a bowl.

Well there can't be only good teams in a conference. Someone has to come in last.

And Vanderbilt's defense is actually decent.

And Kentucky is 5-3 this year..

Yet, out of conference Kentucky still lost at home to Southern Miss...

Their wins have come against all of the cellar dwellers of the SEC. South Carolina, Vandy, Mizzou, and Mississippi State. The bottom part of the SEC did pretty awful out of conference.

So much for A&M lol