Page 1 of 1
Week 9 rankings
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:53 am
by hermes
BCS Rankings
http://espn.go.com/college-football/bcs1 Florida
2 Alabama
3 Texas
4 Iowa
5 USC
6 TCU
7 Boise State
8 Cincinnati
9 LSU
10 Oregon
11 Georgia Tech
12 Penn State
13 Virginia Tech
14 Oklahoma State
15 Pittsburgh
16 Utah
17 Ohio State
18 Houston
19 Miami (FL)
20 Arizona
21 West Virginia
22 South Carolina
23 Notre Dame
24 California
25 Mississippi
iowa up to 4th, and not only that but number 1 in the computers
AP Poll
http://espn.go.com/college-football/rankings/_/poll/11 Florida (30)
2 Alabama (23)
3 Texas (7)
4 USC
5 Cincinnati
6 Boise State
7 Iowa
8 TCU
9 LSU
10 Oregon
11 Georgia Tech
12 Penn State
13 Oklahoma State
14 Virginia Tech
15 Houston
16 Pittsburgh
17 Ohio State
18 Miami (FL)
19 Utah
20 West Virginia
21 South Carolina
22 Oklahoma
23 Arizona
24 Mississippi
25 Notre Dame
Re: Week 9 rankings
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:02 pm
by Latrell
Bama's passing offense is questionable right now..I think Texas should be back in the 2 spot.
Re: Week 9 rankings
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:43 am
by Pai Gow
Anybody notice how tOSU jumps 4 spots after a mediocre win vs. Minnesota?
Also that loss by USC looks worse and worse, and once Oregon finishes them off they should fall out of the top 10, we'll see if it actually happens.
Re: Week 9 rankings
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:53 am
by Latrell
Can someone also explain to me how a team with a loss, playing in a worse conference(arguably) is ranked higher than an undefeated team playing in a stronger conference (arguably)?
Re: Week 9 rankings
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:15 am
by LAKESHOW
why are we 5th? ridiculous. everyone knows we would absolutely kill any of those 4 teams ahead of us. and please dont give us iowa in a bowl game. we get the same thing with a different uniform every year!
Re: Week 9 rankings
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 12:26 pm
by Latrell
Yeah its ridiculous alright. USC should be at # 10 or lower right now...Bottom line is you lost to Washington, a sub .500 team and as flukey as it was its still a loss and you should not be rewarded for it.
Re: Week 9 rankings
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:42 pm
by LAKESHOW
well, by that wisdom, we shouldnt have been on the same playing field as penn state in the rosebowl. yet, that game was over at half time.
hmmmm. youve seemed to have thought that one through.
HOOOORAAAAAY BEER!
Re: Week 9 rankings
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:03 pm
by Latrell
LAKESHOW wrote:well, by that wisdom, we shouldnt have been on the same playing field as penn state in the rosebowl. yet, that game was over at half time.
hmmmm. youve seemed to have thought that one through.
HOOOORAAAAAY BEER!
These rankings arent about which teams have the most talent LAKEHOW, if they were Oklahoma would still be ranked in the Top 5.
Re: Week 9 rankings
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:24 pm
by NO-KG-AI
Latrell wrote:Can someone also explain to me how a team with a loss, playing in a worse conference(arguably) is ranked higher than an undefeated team playing in a stronger conference (arguably)?
And yet people cry that everyone hates on the PAc-10
Re: Week 9 rankings
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 6:20 pm
by El Turco
Pai Gow wrote:Anybody notice how tOSU jumps 4 spots after a mediocre win vs. Minnesota?
nobody noticed because OSU went up 1 spot in AP, 2 spots in Coaches, Harris and BCS. i weep for public education in Utah.
Re: Week 9 rankings
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:33 pm
by studcrackers
this dez bryant stuff is bullsh*t. that is all
Re: Week 9 rankings
Posted: Sun Nov 1, 2009 10:11 am
by Pai Gow
ElTurco wrote:Pai Gow wrote:Anybody notice how tOSU jumps 4 spots after a mediocre win vs. Minnesota?
nobody noticed because OSU went up 1 spot in AP, 2 spots in Coaches, Harris and BCS. i weep for public education in Utah.
oops looked at both the coaches and ap and got them confused...
Was right about that overrated as he'll USC team which will continue to be ranked in the top 15