RealGM

well last time I did this thread my entire team killed it so


Mike Williams (TB) or Mike Wallace- leaning Williams just cause I think TB could do to Stl what Det did to them, Mia corner suck too but Wallace #'s look good last week with Ben at the helm but was that just cause of Clev?

Pick 1
Mcfadden (if he comes back)
Charles
T. Jones (I think with Jones performance last week, Charles is once again probably relegated back to the #2 rb)

Slow week huh? Anyways,

I'd go with Wallace over Williams. I'm starting both this week but if I had to chose on or the other I'm going with Wallace. Miami's secondary isn't special he doesn't fumble and he has a better quarterback.

Charles or Thomas roll the dice with Haley you never know Jones had the big day last week so I guess its Jamaals turn.

Best of Luck.

Wallace and Charles.

As for me, Torain or Moreno? Rivers or Orton?

I'm leaning toward Torain and Orton as of now.

LApwnd wrote:well last time I did this thread my entire team killed it so


Mike Williams (TB) or Mike Wallace- leaning Williams just cause I think TB could do to Stl what Det did to them, Mia corner suck too but Wallace #'s look good last week with Ben at the helm but was that just cause of Clev?

Pick 1
Mcfadden (if he comes back)
Charles
T. Jones (I think with Jones performance last week, Charles is once again probably relegated back to the #2 rb)

Wallace over Williams. TB's offense looked awful last week, and StL's defense is surprisingly good. Vonta Davis is decent, but Wallace is always a threat to take a 60 yard bomb to the house.

Charles over the other two. I wouldn't want a recovering McFadden against Denver's run D, and Charles is looking like the better back over Jones (finally).

ZedgetRedd wrote:As for me, Torain or Moreno? Rivers or Orton?

I'm leaning toward Torain and Orton as of now.

I'd go Rivers over Orton. NE-SD is going to be a shootout, and the Pats secondary is terrible. Orton's been excellent, but would it surprise you if they went up big on the Raiders early and leaned on the run game a bit more in the second half? I can't decide between Torain and Moreno though. The Raiders are 31st in fantasy points allowed to RBs in standard scoring leagues, but Moreno might not get more than 15 touches with Maroney and Buckhalter waiting to spell him off. The Bears have given up three big days and three stingy days, though the stingy days were against Barber, Brandon Jackson, and the Panthers (who had NO receivers for that game, so they could stack 8 in the box). Tough call -- I think both should have good games and it's hard to go wrong. No one else you can bench for either guy?

Torain n Orton for sure.

Hakeem Nicks or Hines Ward?

My mini-dilemmas:

Sit one: Welker (@SD), Maclin (@Ten), Bowe (v. Jax), Smith 1.0 (v. SF)
Start one: Z. Miller (@Den), Witten (v. NYG)
Sit one: Torain (@Chi), R. Moss (@GB), Welker (@SD), Smith 2.0 (@DAL)
Start one: Z. Miller (@Den), Hernandez (@SD)

Jake Steed wrote:Torain n Orton for sure.

Hakeem Nicks or Hines Ward?

I'd probably go Nicks. Ward is likely a safe bet for 6 points, but might get in the end zone. Nicks had a terrible game last week, so I wouldn't be surprised if the Giants come out with a plan of getting him some big plays.

Maritimer wrote:

Jake Steed wrote:Torain n Orton for sure.

Hakeem Nicks or Hines Ward?

I'd probably go Nicks. Ward is likely a safe bet for 6 points, but might get in the end zone. Nicks had a terrible game last week, so I wouldn't be surprised if the Giants come out with a plan of getting him some big plays.

That's what I was thinking but he's "questionable" for the game with hammy tightness. I wouldn't care about that except it is a monday night game so if he's out then im screwed.

ivory or torain?

Peyton Hillis or Greg Jennings. Flex.

LApwnd wrote:well last time I did this thread my entire team killed it so


Mike Williams (TB) or Mike Wallace- leaning Williams just cause I think TB could do to Stl what Det did to them, Mia corner suck too but Wallace #'s look good last week with Ben at the helm but was that just cause of Clev?

Pick 1
Mcfadden (if he comes back)
Charles
T. Jones (I think with Jones performance last week, Charles is once again probably relegated back to the #2 rb)

If you didn't start McFadden cause of my advice sorry bro. Hopefully you didn't read that post and played him. I don't think anyone forecasted that Oakland would lay down that sort of beating.

Maritimer wrote:

LApwnd wrote:Pick 1
Mcfadden (if he comes back)
Charles
T. Jones (I think with Jones performance last week, Charles is once again probably relegated back to the #2 rb)

Charles over the other two. I wouldn't want a recovering McFadden against Denver's run D, and Charles is looking like the better back over Jones (finally).

Ooooof. I, too, hope you didn't listen to me. Going into the week, I still don't think I'd have done anything differently, but man oh man what a day by DMC.

No worries guys, I did go with Charles/Wallace but guess what I also had Roddy "roudy" White and the ever so consistent AP .....my team beasted this week even w/o McFadden but yea there was no way I would've seen that coming out of him especially against Den in Den .......