ImageImageImageImageImage

Why the Warriors should and will re-sign Kuminga

Moderators: Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose, Sleepy51

User avatar
Onus
RealGM
Posts: 23,162
And1: 6,975
Joined: May 12, 2008
Location: NOA

Re: Why the Warriors should and will re-sign Kuminga 

Post#61 » by Onus » Thu Jul 17, 2025 6:12 pm

vvoland wrote:
Onus wrote:
KevinMcreynolds wrote:
He exposed him to the league, so now he has to take his losses. If they pass up Carter we’ll probably end up with even less later on. JK’s value is going to continue going down.


Why does he have to take his loss? Lacob is just going to continue to force JK on this team


While it's undeniable Lacob has huge influence over FO decisions, I am willing to bet significant money that he has 0 say over Kerr's rotations. Not just because they've been so weird and often feature players the FO is not invested in over the youth the FO drafted. Mostly because Kerr is a no b.s. dude, once fought Mike in practice, and has 4 rings (3 in his first 4 years as coach). He doesn't need the job, has the ultimate backing from players, and is a strong personality. He has more say over FO decisions than lacob has over the lineups.

Are you trying to say that Kerr wants JK on the team?
Most 4th Quarter Points in Final since 1991
1995 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5
2000 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5 (61.1% TS)
2015 Stephen Curry 10.8 (75.1% TS)
1997 Michael Jordan 10.7 (55.1% TS)
1998 Michael Jordan 10.6 (50.6% TS)
2011 Dirk Nowitzki 10.3 (68.0% TS)
vvoland
Starter
Posts: 2,287
And1: 489
Joined: Jun 26, 2008

Re: Why the Warriors should and will re-sign Kuminga 

Post#62 » by vvoland » Thu Jul 17, 2025 6:16 pm

Onus wrote:
vvoland wrote:
Onus wrote:
Why does he have to take his loss? Lacob is just going to continue to force JK on this team


While it's undeniable Lacob has huge influence over FO decisions, I am willing to bet significant money that he has 0 say over Kerr's rotations. Not just because they've been so weird and often feature players the FO is not invested in over the youth the FO drafted. Mostly because Kerr is a no b.s. dude, once fought Mike in practice, and has 4 rings (3 in his first 4 years as coach). He doesn't need the job, has the ultimate backing from players, and is a strong personality. He has more say over FO decisions than lacob has over the lineups.

Are you trying to say that Kerr wants JK on the team?


Not at all. I'm just saying exactly what I said, that Lacob has no influence over Kerr's rotations. If Kerr ran the FO, I'm sure JK would have not been drafted and would have been traded by now, for sure. If that's what you meant by 'continue to force,' then, sure. I don't think JK's minutes indicate any forcing happening outside of whatever Steve thinks is the right call. I may disagree on what Kerr thinks that might be, but I fully agree that the FO shouldn't meddle in the rotations/minutes decisions.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,614
And1: 4,049
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Why the Warriors should and will re-sign Kuminga 

Post#63 » by EvanZ » Thu Jul 17, 2025 7:49 pm

I wish Kuminga would resign.
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:

https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
DAWill1128
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,656
And1: 1,953
Joined: Jun 17, 2004
   

Re: Why the Warriors should and will re-sign Kuminga 

Post#64 » by DAWill1128 » Thu Jul 17, 2025 8:21 pm

I am hoping they just bring Kuminga back and we explore moving him closer to the trade deadline, even if it involves picks on our end.

Some of these teams out west are absolutely stacked, they need a large contract on hand if they are coming up short.
bay2hk
Rookie
Posts: 1,132
And1: 107
Joined: Jan 17, 2007

Re: Why the Warriors should and will re-sign Kuminga 

Post#65 » by bay2hk » Thu Jul 17, 2025 9:09 pm

Stay pat and force JK to sign the QO. He’s not worth more than $16m annually
TB
General Manager
Posts: 9,503
And1: 1,374
Joined: Mar 11, 2007

Re: Why the Warriors should and will re-sign Kuminga 

Post#66 » by TB » Thu Jul 17, 2025 9:22 pm

bay2hk wrote:Stay pat and force JK to sign the QO. He’s not worth more than $16m annually


I think it benefits the Warriors and Kuminga more to sign a larger deal.

For Kuminga, avoids the Noel/Schroder risk. Lock in wealth with opt outs in your mid 20s. If the relationship with Warriors stays awful, he can force his way into a trade as early as December.

For Warriors, keeps Kuminga long-term if it works out with him. Very tradable contract even at 20m a year.

This all seems like a no brainer if there aren’t any S&T options.
bay2hk
Rookie
Posts: 1,132
And1: 107
Joined: Jan 17, 2007

Re: Why the Warriors should and will re-sign Kuminga 

Post#67 » by bay2hk » Thu Jul 17, 2025 9:58 pm

TB wrote:
bay2hk wrote:Stay pat and force JK to sign the QO. He’s not worth more than $16m annually


I think it benefits the Warriors and Kuminga more to sign a larger deal.

For Kuminga, avoids the Noel/Schroder risk. Lock in wealth with opt outs in your mid 20s. If the relationship with Warriors stays awful, he can force his way into a trade as early as December.

For Warriors, keeps Kuminga long-term if it works out with him. Very tradable contract even at 20m a year.

This all seems like a no brainer if there aren’t any S&T options.


Better to s&t now if we don’t plan to keep him but the trade market for him sucks. One scenario Warriors are prob trying to avoid is having to give up draft capital to get rid of JK’s contract if he doesn’t perform (e.g. Poole / CP3 trade).

Based on JK’s past 4 years, I’ll wager he’s not going to figure it out under Warriors’ current system. Doesn’t have the IQ or motor to be a team player / rebounder / plus defender.

JK signing the QO also gives us a lot of options with NTMLE, BAE and TPE going into the season to improve our roster. There will be roster casualty before the season starts and we can trade for good players on the cheap with our TPE.
GQ Hot Dog
General Manager
Posts: 9,474
And1: 5,652
Joined: May 15, 2006
Location: On the road...
     

Re: Why the Warriors should and will re-sign Kuminga 

Post#68 » by GQ Hot Dog » Fri Jul 18, 2025 1:11 am

TB wrote:
bay2hk wrote:Stay pat and force JK to sign the QO. He’s not worth more than $16m annually


I think it benefits the Warriors and Kuminga more to sign a larger deal.

For Kuminga, avoids the Noel/Schroder risk. Lock in wealth with opt outs in your mid 20s. If the relationship with Warriors stays awful, he can force his way into a trade as early as December.

For Warriors, keeps Kuminga long-term if it works out with him. Very tradable contract even at 20m a year.

This all seems like a no brainer if there aren’t any S&T options.

I agree with all of this.

For people anxious to get him out the door to open up FA options for us right now, it seems overly pessimistic on Kuminga's ability to help and overly optimistic regarding this team's chances without Kuminga taking a big step forward. None of the exceptions or FA options that would be opened up by getting rid of him will substantially push the team toward contending. The best path toward contending is to keep Kuminga and make sure Kerr is invested in making it work with him or trade him midseason along with picks for a big time player.

Either way, just jettisoning him serves only to usher this team toward rebuilding because the roster as constructed is just not good enough to contend.
The hottest of takes...
Jester_ wrote:Hot take: Moses Moody shows the potential to be a star/#2 option ala Lauri Markkanen. Both the eye test and the advanced stats show a player with extremely high slope.
vvoland
Starter
Posts: 2,287
And1: 489
Joined: Jun 26, 2008

Re: Why the Warriors should and will re-sign Kuminga 

Post#69 » by vvoland » Fri Jul 18, 2025 2:17 am

GQ Hot Dog wrote:
TB wrote:
bay2hk wrote:Stay pat and force JK to sign the QO. He’s not worth more than $16m annually


I think it benefits the Warriors and Kuminga more to sign a larger deal.

For Kuminga, avoids the Noel/Schroder risk. Lock in wealth with opt outs in your mid 20s. If the relationship with Warriors stays awful, he can force his way into a trade as early as December.

For Warriors, keeps Kuminga long-term if it works out with him. Very tradable contract even at 20m a year.

This all seems like a no brainer if there aren’t any S&T options.

I agree with all of this.

For people anxious to get him out the door to open up FA options for us right now, it seems overly pessimistic on Kuminga's ability to help and overly optimistic regarding this team's chances without Kuminga taking a big step forward. None of the exceptions or FA options that would be opened up by getting rid of him will substantially push the team toward contending. The best path toward contending is to keep Kuminga and make sure Kerr is invested in making it work with him or trade him midseason along with picks for a big time player.

Either way, just jettisoning him serves only to usher this team toward rebuilding because the roster as constructed is just not good enough to contend.


I think this is exactly what a lot of this board would prefer.
CS707
General Manager
Posts: 8,436
And1: 7,017
Joined: Dec 23, 2003

Re: Why the Warriors should and will re-sign Kuminga 

Post#70 » by CS707 » Fri Jul 18, 2025 2:21 am

Onus wrote:
vvoland wrote:
Onus wrote:
Why does he have to take his loss? Lacob is just going to continue to force JK on this team


While it's undeniable Lacob has huge influence over FO decisions, I am willing to bet significant money that he has 0 say over Kerr's rotations. Not just because they've been so weird and often feature players the FO is not invested in over the youth the FO drafted. Mostly because Kerr is a no b.s. dude, once fought Mike in practice, and has 4 rings (3 in his first 4 years as coach). He doesn't need the job, has the ultimate backing from players, and is a strong personality. He has more say over FO decisions than lacob has over the lineups.

Are you trying to say that Kerr wants JK on the team?


I think Steve wants JK to succeed but play the way he’s being asked. I think Steve genuinely feels what he’s asking JK to do and what is going to lead to his success is one and the same. It, IMO, is loosely akin to the Larry Brown/Iverson relationship. Larry knew what was best for AI but both of them were hardheaded.
Nate the Great
Pro Prospect
Posts: 933
And1: 414
Joined: Dec 13, 2019
     

Re: Why the Warriors should and will re-sign Kuminga 

Post#71 » by Nate the Great » Tue Jul 22, 2025 12:45 am

Best case scenario, Kuminga signs for around $20m per, they feed him the ball and run up his PPG total, then trade him to some team that thinks they can make a complete player out of him and get something useful in return. Worst case scenario, they give into his demands and sign him to the big contract he wants for $30+m, he goes back to thinking all he has to do is dunk, and we read “dump Kuminga” offers on the trade board for years.

Black Lives Matter
Crazy-Canuck
RealGM
Posts: 29,352
And1: 7,399
Joined: Nov 24, 2003

Re: Why the Warriors should and will re-sign Kuminga 

Post#72 » by Crazy-Canuck » Tue Jul 22, 2025 1:07 am

GQ Hot Dog wrote:
TB wrote:
bay2hk wrote:Stay pat and force JK to sign the QO. He’s not worth more than $16m annually


I think it benefits the Warriors and Kuminga more to sign a larger deal.

For Kuminga, avoids the Noel/Schroder risk. Lock in wealth with opt outs in your mid 20s. If the relationship with Warriors stays awful, he can force his way into a trade as early as December.

For Warriors, keeps Kuminga long-term if it works out with him. Very tradable contract even at 20m a year.

This all seems like a no brainer if there aren’t any S&T options.

I agree with all of this.

For people anxious to get him out the door to open up FA options for us right now, it seems overly pessimistic on Kuminga's ability to help and overly optimistic regarding this team's chances without Kuminga taking a big step forward. None of the exceptions or FA options that would be opened up by getting rid of him will substantially push the team toward contending. The best path toward contending is to keep Kuminga and make sure Kerr is invested in making it work with him or trade him midseason along with picks for a big time player.

Either way, just jettisoning him serves only to usher this team toward rebuilding because the roster as constructed is just not good enough to contend.


The one drawback is that teams making a big deal (if trading jk for a starter) at the deadline has never worked out well that season. Acclimating with the system, with the players, the move, etc.. I recall a tweet where any team that has made a significant deal has ALWAYS faltered that season. I brought it up when the jimmy deal was made. It's this season where the trade was supposed to bear fruit. Unfortunately, we are now mired in the kuminga dilemma.

We would then essentially waste another steph year. And jimmy becomes a FA.

Unless we bring back a former warrior to replace jk, the best chance for steph might be for jk to figure it. And im very pro trading kuminga.
Nate the Great
Pro Prospect
Posts: 933
And1: 414
Joined: Dec 13, 2019
     

Re: Why the Warriors should and will re-sign Kuminga 

Post#73 » by Nate the Great » Tue Jul 22, 2025 12:46 pm

Crazy-Canuck wrote:
GQ Hot Dog wrote:
TB wrote:
I think it benefits the Warriors and Kuminga more to sign a larger deal.

For Kuminga, avoids the Noel/Schroder risk. Lock in wealth with opt outs in your mid 20s. If the relationship with Warriors stays awful, he can force his way into a trade as early as December.

For Warriors, keeps Kuminga long-term if it works out with him. Very tradable contract even at 20m a year.

This all seems like a no brainer if there aren’t any S&T options.

I agree with all of this.

For people anxious to get him out the door to open up FA options for us right now, it seems overly pessimistic on Kuminga's ability to help and overly optimistic regarding this team's chances without Kuminga taking a big step forward. None of the exceptions or FA options that would be opened up by getting rid of him will substantially push the team toward contending. The best path toward contending is to keep Kuminga and make sure Kerr is invested in making it work with him or trade him midseason along with picks for a big time player.

Either way, just jettisoning him serves only to usher this team toward rebuilding because the roster as constructed is just not good enough to contend.


The one drawback is that teams making a big deal (if trading jk for a starter) at the deadline has never worked out well that season. Acclimating with the system, with the players, the move, etc.. I recall a tweet where any team that has made a significant deal has ALWAYS faltered that season. I brought it up when the jimmy deal was made. It's this season where the trade was supposed to bear fruit. Unfortunately, we are now mired in the kuminga dilemma.

We would then essentially waste another steph year. And jimmy becomes a FA.

Unless we bring back a former warrior to replace jk, the best chance for steph might be for jk to figure it. And im very pro trading kuminga.


Unless figuring it out involves learning to shoot, someone will still need to be traded. They can’t be giving Kuminga, Draymond and Jimmy major minutes. The Warriors are largely responsible for the fact that, in today’s NBA, a team can’t function without at least one shooter in the frontcourt. Jimmy and Draymond at least compensate with good defense, so maybe Kuminga can try a little harder on that end?

Black Lives Matter
HiRez
RealGM
Posts: 14,828
And1: 4,055
Joined: Dec 29, 2011

Re: Why the Warriors should and will re-sign Kuminga 

Post#74 » by HiRez » Tue Jul 22, 2025 7:26 pm

Crazy-Canuck wrote:The one drawback is that teams making a big deal (if trading jk for a starter) at the deadline has never worked out well that season. Acclimating with the system, with the players, the move, etc.. I recall a tweet where any team that has made a significant deal has ALWAYS faltered that season. I brought it up when the jimmy deal was made. It's this season where the trade was supposed to bear fruit. Unfortunately, we are now mired in the kuminga dilemma.

We would then essentially waste another steph year. And jimmy becomes a FA.

Unless we bring back a former warrior to replace jk, the best chance for steph might be for jk to figure it. And im very pro trading kuminga.

But didn't it work with Jimmy? Nearly spectacularly, actually. The only reason they faltered is health: first Kuminga (never really got a chance to figure things out with Jimmy), then Steph, and finally Jimmy himself. Not to mention Podz and Moody both developing late-season injuries that really hurt their ability to shoot. But I think the move itself was very successful and Jimmy integrated himself very quickly.

Return to Golden State Warriors