Hopper15 wrote:You guys are arguing the wrong guy. It's West you should be arguing.
Yeah true, but West is a big hence you'd have to argue Camby or JoHoward against West.
Baron got dissed based on politics. If Roy didn't get in because of Baron making it, would people saying that Roy deserved it over Baron? Yes. but not as much.
To me Deron Williams has a bigger argument for than roy.
Roy got in based on a strong first half. Well Baron had a strong first half. Baron erased the injury reason and also the winning team issue. Add to that the Warriors haven't been represented since Sprewell and you have a major snub.
If Roy wouldn't have made it you could look at age and numbers as a reason for him not getting in THIS YEAR. The only way Roy wouldn't make a future team would be if he had a really damaging injury or the Trailblazers were absolutely horrible in years to come. I doubt either of those things happen.
when it's between a young guy versus an older guy, usually the older guy gets the respectful nod. This year the cards were stacked against him based on the location and the coach. There's your reason.
Roy's deserving, but Baron had the better resume.