Mylie10 wrote:I'm not down for any deal with the clips that doesn't have Brand coming back.
Brand's the key.
No way do I want us having to deal with Baron, Brand, Kaman, Livingston, and Thorton. That's probably better than what we end up with.
Now Baron for Brand may be a pipe dream, but that's what I want.
We might be able to sign Maggette or work a sign and trade without involving Baron if you really want the guy.
If it's the pick you're after, there's no-one who'll give us the impact of Baron or having to play Baron four times a year.
i deal with the Lakers, because they're already better than us. We don't have to leap frog them.
Odom and Ariza would be good enough for me, but you guys can debate that.
Also as for Miami being a destination. Not Baron's first pick, but if it's a money thing and he can get that from Miami, there are worst places he could go.
Marion for a year or 2 could be interesting with Tay, Wright, Jax, and Beans. Your talking long and athletic. Problem with Marion is what guy is coming in? Problem child, or Nellie big.
Overall i expect Baron and the Dubs to reach an agreement. Then next year when things are shaping up you can decide if you wanna put Baron on the trade deadline block.
If Baron holds firm with the 20 million dollar number, then the scramble for the best deal available begins.
+ 1 Mylie.
I say we should try and "steal him" from the Clips (let him opt out and get him for nothing other than the big salary cap hit we'd have to assume) or force the Clips to trade him to us for less than they'd like to. I'm not interested in making any deals with anyone in our conference which makes them better than it makes us (especially any of the LA teams).