ImageImageImageImageImage

Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck

Moderators: Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose, Sleepy51

Sleepy51
Forum Mod - Warriors
Forum Mod - Warriors
Posts: 35,709
And1: 2,331
Joined: Jun 28, 2005

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#21 » by Sleepy51 » Wed Jul 2, 2008 2:33 am

Sid the Squid wrote:To stay releveant? WTF? Who f****g cares..I hate all the new fans who cheered Fat azz's every move.


When I say relevant, I mean giving the team a chance to win on any given night (when he took his motivation pills) I'm not talking about national coverage or box office draw, I'm talking about not being crappy.

You were suckling at Baron's man-teats along with everyone else during the playoff run last year, so don't get all holy'er than thou.
Jester_ wrote:Can we trade Draymond Green for Grayson Allen?
Sid the Squid
Banned User
Posts: 26,062
And1: 9
Joined: Sep 16, 2005

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#22 » by Sid the Squid » Wed Jul 2, 2008 2:38 am

Yea I was totally swept away by Baron...We Believe!!!...lol
Sleepy51
Forum Mod - Warriors
Forum Mod - Warriors
Posts: 35,709
And1: 2,331
Joined: Jun 28, 2005

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#23 » by Sleepy51 » Wed Jul 2, 2008 2:40 am

Sid the Squid wrote:Yea I was totally swept away by Baron...We Believe!!!...lol


Don't make me go diggin in the crates. The posts are there. You jumped on the bandwagon as hard as anyone for a while there. We talked about it directly and you were very forthright about your frontrunning. Don't hide from it now. You loved winning as much as any fan should. I'll probably do the same if the Gilber show got us to the conference finals.

But don't pretend you didn't like not being garbage. You were a chubby chaser too for a while back there. Own it. :wink:
Sid the Squid
Banned User
Posts: 26,062
And1: 9
Joined: Sep 16, 2005

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#24 » by Sid the Squid » Wed Jul 2, 2008 2:45 am

How many times did I say * I MISS THE DROUGHT YEARS* ?

I never felt like this team was playing the right way..

Did I lose my sense of direction in the middle of the mavs series? Sure..But I was never happy about the new crowds...They sucked donkey balls!!
Sleepy51
Forum Mod - Warriors
Forum Mod - Warriors
Posts: 35,709
And1: 2,331
Joined: Jun 28, 2005

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#25 » by Sleepy51 » Wed Jul 2, 2008 2:51 am

Sid the Squid wrote:How many times did I say * I MISS THE DROUGHT YEARS* ?

I never felt like this team was playing the right way..

Did I lose my sense of direction in the middle of the mavs series? Sure..But I was never happy about the new crowds...They sucked donkey balls!!


You've never been afraid to change your lipitor addled mind, and I think we all kind of respect you for that, but don't pretend it never happend. We all had the mancrush for a while.

Better to have loved and lost . . .
Jester_ wrote:Can we trade Draymond Green for Grayson Allen?
Sid the Squid
Banned User
Posts: 26,062
And1: 9
Joined: Sep 16, 2005

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#26 » by Sid the Squid » Wed Jul 2, 2008 2:53 am

Before yes..Back when Baron finished that 1st season with us..I loved having him here..All the way up till he showed up in Hawaii at 235.
Sleepy51
Forum Mod - Warriors
Forum Mod - Warriors
Posts: 35,709
And1: 2,331
Joined: Jun 28, 2005

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#27 » by Sleepy51 » Wed Jul 2, 2008 3:01 am

Sid the Squid wrote:Before yes..Back when Baron finished that 1st season with us..I loved having him here..All the way up till he showed up in Hawaii at 235.


You were humping his leg with everyone else this season too. You were tossing his salad right up until you went to that game where he didn't warm up.

No one holds it against you. Just don't be a liar.
Jester_ wrote:Can we trade Draymond Green for Grayson Allen?
Sid the Squid
Banned User
Posts: 26,062
And1: 9
Joined: Sep 16, 2005

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#28 » by Sid the Squid » Wed Jul 2, 2008 3:05 am

Bad memory...Oh well..Just because you feel betrayed by BoomFizzle..Dont take it on me...I gave up on him long ago..Today is my day
Sleepy51
Forum Mod - Warriors
Forum Mod - Warriors
Posts: 35,709
And1: 2,331
Joined: Jun 28, 2005

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#29 » by Sleepy51 » Wed Jul 2, 2008 3:13 am

Sid the Squid wrote:Bad memory...Oh well..Just because you feel betrayed by BoomFizzle..Dont take it on me...I gave up on him long ago..Today is my day


Bad memory? You or me? You were on the jock this season until he dissapointed you in warmups. We discussed it at length.

I'm not mad, I don't fell betrayed. He was supposed to leave, and he got the offer he was looking for. I've never been mad at a player for getting paid, not even Gil. It's their career, their body, their life, not mine. I'm happy that we have capspace, but I would have preferred to keep Mullin's hands off of it, that's the extent of my emotional response to this.

I just like undercutting you when you get self righteous. :D
Jester_ wrote:Can we trade Draymond Green for Grayson Allen?
User avatar
Chris Porter's Hair
Forum Mod - Warriors
Forum Mod - Warriors
Posts: 8,877
And1: 3,716
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Location: San Mateo, CA

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#30 » by Chris Porter's Hair » Wed Jul 2, 2008 3:41 am

I don't think they'll necessarily suck, but I do think they're going to have a hell of a lot of cash bet on some pretty big injury risks. That is one serious house of cards. So they might be very good (I'd guess still not good enough to get out of the west), but they also might suck if someone gets hurt, and if they do they'll suck AND have a hard time fixing things.
Image

crzyyafrican makes the best sigs, quite frankly
User avatar
macballer30
Senior
Posts: 735
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 29, 2004

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#31 » by macballer30 » Wed Jul 2, 2008 3:45 am

I wish I could agree that the Clips will suck, but they won't (unless one two or three of them get hurt). Baron, Gordon, Thornton, Brand, Kaman, is a big, strong, athletic, starting 5. If Gordon can be a lights out shooter, he opens things up for the inside guys. They can rebound with anyone in the league.

That's a pretty scary team if you ask me, but still not as good as Lakers, Spurs, Jazz, Hornets.
Clip34life
Analyst
Posts: 3,627
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 19, 2002

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#32 » by Clip34life » Wed Jul 2, 2008 4:03 am

Hmm I think the only teams better are Lakers, Hornets, Celtics, and that's about it unless someone else makes a crazy signing. Wizard are going to suck now that they've locked in all that money to Jamison. Problem with us is we've used up all our money and we don't have much depth. Maybe we can do a 2 for 1 or 3 for 1 trade of Mobley or Thomas to a team that wants some cap space in 2010.
I really like 1840s merchant vessels. Basketball on the other hand, I can take it or leave it...
Chris Cohan
Banned User
Posts: 16,891
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 23, 2007
Location: NBA Purgatory (Lateral Move)
Contact:

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#33 » by Chris Cohan » Wed Jul 2, 2008 4:07 am

And so the groggy morning after irrationality of post-Baron Davis acquisition and awakening from NBA basketball hibernation begins anew....
DanLanghiOwnsAll
Veteran
Posts: 2,690
And1: 28
Joined: Dec 22, 2004

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#34 » by DanLanghiOwnsAll » Wed Jul 2, 2008 4:26 am

Clip34life wrote:Hmm I think the only teams better are Lakers, Hornets, Celtics, and that's about it unless someone else makes a crazy signing.


This sounds like a Warrior fan after the 2007 playoff run/
User avatar
mistatwo mayn
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,385
And1: 1
Joined: Mar 13, 2006
Location: Yay Area

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#35 » by mistatwo mayn » Wed Jul 2, 2008 5:15 am

Warriors blew it....

Can't blame Baron.

Wow... frikkin, dumbest move. Starts the Gugliotta years now.
Clippers will be good; if they click they will be the 3rd best team in the West.
I wouldn't be surprised if they tried to get Artest as part of a 3 way with Maggette....
User avatar
old rem
RealGM
Posts: 50,753
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Witness Protection

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck donkey balls 

Post#36 » by old rem » Wed Jul 2, 2008 5:19 am

Barkley+GS=Love wrote:im waiting for Baron and Brand both trying to post up and neither giving up the ball.



Baron was among the assist leaders without any low post high% guy to feed. If LAC pulls this off only losing Magette they kick our cheap young tails for at least 4 more years. Beyond that we need to worry about Portland.
CENSORED... No comment.
User avatar
old rem
RealGM
Posts: 50,753
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Witness Protection

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#37 » by old rem » Wed Jul 2, 2008 5:27 am

mistatwo mayn wrote:Warriors blew it....

Can't blame Baron.

Wow... frikkin, dumbest move. Starts the Gugliotta years now.
Clippers will be good; if they click they will be the 3rd best team in the West.
I wouldn't be surprised if they tried to get Artest as part of a 3 way with Maggette....


To add Baron, Brand or Maggette has to be renounced--which means totally gone-no S+T possible.
It seems they expect to get Brand to also take a $5 mill pay cut. You can speculate on what secret payoffs make guys pass on maybe $10 mill more. Adding Baron,keeping Brand (no Maggette) and signing Gordon is about all they can do,and that's plenty. Having a real PG makes everyone else better.
CENSORED... No comment.
User avatar
WarFan
RealGM
Posts: 14,030
And1: 1,507
Joined: Jul 30, 2007
Location: Aptos, CA
     

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#38 » by WarFan » Wed Jul 2, 2008 5:45 am

I wouldn't be that surprised to see this turn into a S&T still. Right now LAC are completely capped out with no MLE and a pretty thin bench. If they convince Mullin to make it a S&T of Mobley, Gordon and picks (could be something else like Jordan, but this would be my guess) they don't have to renounce Maggette and can still sign more depth with the MLE. It depends on how ready they think Gordon is this year, how much money Sterling really wants to spend, and whether the LA FO thinks that they would be more competitive for the the next few years with Maggette and the MLE or Mobley and Gordon. Jackson and/or Harrington could also be included for Thomas/Knight as well.
BROWN
RealGM
Posts: 10,955
And1: 74
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: RealCity - MTL

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#39 » by BROWN » Wed Jul 2, 2008 6:03 am

BD is the man, i just hope the L.A lifestyle doesn't get to his head.
I just don't want him pullin off some fake injuries for a movie debut, or production.
He seems like the guy who cares about his life after basketball, then basketball itself.
Just don' want the clips fans coming back here and telling us, that Baron is terrible and that
we should have him back. or something like that, cause I'm happy now that he's goen, before i was veryvery upset. Call me BIPOLAR. but thinking about it for the franchise and for our youngs, Baron leaving was the best decision for both parties. .MY favorite player gets to play where he wants and my favorite franchise gets some relief and gets to develop its youth properly
User avatar
NYKBaller
General Manager
Posts: 8,410
And1: 241
Joined: Apr 29, 2004
Location: Southside Jamaica Queens
Contact:

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#40 » by NYKBaller » Wed Jul 2, 2008 1:24 pm

naah its going to be awesome...sorry
Follow me at @CTthatdude & watch www.youtube.com/CTthatdude

Return to Golden State Warriors