marthafokker wrote:Looks like LeGM is sitting out for a power play?
Hmmmm.... he wants to play with Steph, right?
Or hes involved in the pdiddy case

Moderators: Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose, Sleepy51
marthafokker wrote:Looks like LeGM is sitting out for a power play?
Hmmmm.... he wants to play with Steph, right?
Crazy-Canuck wrote:If the Warriors go big fish hunting, I go all in on AD.
Jester_ wrote:(Referring to the practice of butt caning) Yeah that's why we (Singapore) have beautiful streets and safe communities while y'all (San Francisco) live in bum-adled squalor and think it's freedom
CDM_Stats wrote:Crazy-Canuck wrote:If the Warriors go big fish hunting, I go all in on AD.
I'd love it but LeBron will only allow a trade where he comes out the winner and any trade where the Warriors get AD and Curry's still on the roster.. he's losing that deal
Old_Blue wrote:Indiana is denying that it's "dangling" Myles Turner, but I wonder what their asking price would be. For a number of reasons, the Pacers might be less interested in Kuminga than in a package of an expiring contract like Looney and cost controlled young players like Moody, Podz and TJD. That would leave Melton and Kuminga still available to trade for other needs.
wco81 wrote:He's okay but he's approaching 30 now and he never seemed like a great rebounder.
Despite his shot blocking, is he a good post defender? Seems like bigger centers are going to punish him on rebounding.
He had that elite year for blocks, averaging 3.4 blocks a game. But he was only 1.9 last season and 2.0 this season.
Interesting, he's an expiring $19.9 million contract.
Pacers would have to really be out of playoffs contention to trade Myles. They're off to a poor start but since they gave Hali and Siakam big contracts, they're not going to give up. They will probably see if Hali can regain his stroke before they'd consider moving him.
If the team did well enough, they'd probably re-sign him since they only have Obi to back him up and they just acquired Thomas Bryant.
I don't know if they're counting on Wiseman to come back from Achilles though he's a real cheap contract.
Onus wrote:Seriously a trade only helps if it changes who Kerr ends up closing with. If who we trade for doesn’t change who we close with then it’s just moving chairs on the titanic.
We can’t be closing with curry/gp/jk/dray/looney or any type of that lineup. Even if we replace Wiggins for one of gp/jk/looney that’s still not enough. So whomever we trade for has to fit in the closing lineup or remove one of those 3 players from closing.
DonaldSanders wrote:Onus wrote:Seriously a trade only helps if it changes who Kerr ends up closing with. If who we trade for doesn’t change who we close with then it’s just moving chairs on the titanic.
We can’t be closing with curry/gp/jk/dray/looney or any type of that lineup. Even if we replace Wiggins for one of gp/jk/looney that’s still not enough. So whomever we trade for has to fit in the closing lineup or remove one of those 3 players from closing.
Yeah that's why I was willing to consider Butler, for closing. Hopefully Dennis helps enough with that closing unit, I assume he'll come off the bench and run the 2nd unit, then also close.
We could still trade Dennis but that seems unlikely given he'll probably be a good fit -- but it drastically lowers the chances that we trade for a star this year. I'm a little concerned we may end up paying JK 35 million (one report said we didn't want to include Kuminga in a Cam or DFS discussion), then Butler for 50 million will seem like a value.
wco81 wrote:Schroeder and Curry in the closing lineup?
That’s awfully small.
Teams will try to find post up mismatches.
GQ Hot Dog wrote:Kerr has done more with the least talent available of any coach in the history of the game.
Return to Golden State Warriors