ImageImageImageImageImage

WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1

Moderators: floppymoose, Sleepy51, Chris Porter's Hair

User avatar
whatisacenter
RealGM
Posts: 13,318
And1: 15,463
Joined: Aug 05, 2013
 

Re: WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1 

Post#1041 » by whatisacenter » Mon Mar 8, 2021 11:51 pm

clyde21 wrote:Mobley is the perfect modern day C, that's a guy you drafted 2nd overall and not even think twice about it because of his toolset, ball skills, and ability to play multiple positions and on different levels...he's not the physical presence Wiseman is but who the hell cares, Mobley is such a stud


I like Mobley too but I do have some reservations. He has more of a KD build than an AD but without the KD skillset. His 3 point % on low volume at college distance is below 30% and his FT % is just under 70%. In the games I have watched him play at USC he is playing the anchor of a 2-3 zone most of the time and I did not see him a lot on the perimeter switching in man D.
Madvillain been as high as Kathmandu
And tilted to the side like that fat man's shoe
michaelm
RealGM
Posts: 12,189
And1: 5,227
Joined: Apr 06, 2010
 

Re: WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1 

Post#1042 » by michaelm » Tue Mar 9, 2021 12:55 am

DAWill1128 wrote:The narrative surrounding James before the draft amongst critics is actually much different than the current circumstance.

People thought he was a slow footed big guy, which he isn’t. He is actually really fast for a 7 footer or just a center in general.

A lot of people didn’t think he could shoot, he’s actually a good shooter for a center. He’s actually a great shooter for a 19 year old 7-1 guy, really pretty impressive.

People didn’t think he could do anything with the ball, his handle for a center is pretty good.

Most everyone thought he was a good athlete in general outside a few posts that were just non-sensical IMO.

Nobody wanted a brute strong traditional center. People thought that was worthless, ineffective, and outdated with the current game. I never felt that way, I thought a guy like Steven Adams would look good with the guys we have. Bogut looked great even to the end.

Now here we are and the truth is, the guys not enough of a traditional center which was not expected. He doesn’t get deep enough position when catching the ball. He’s not strong on box outs, he’s in a less than favorable position when the ball comes off the rim. When he attacks with the dribble or posts up his handle and moves look fine but his finishes are kinda weak where he gets nudged off his release.

Like someone said earlier, he doesn’t have enough Kanter in him. He doesn’t quite understand how to use a power game to get little leverage advantages around the hoop. He’s more of a run and jump guy.

But having a guy who can run and jump at 7-1 guy with a with a 7-6 wingspan who can shoot the outside shot and has a decent handle is a great position to start for a center.

If you drafted a center and his biggest room for improvement was in the strength department to battle inside that would be the most favorable thing to need to work on. You can have a guy hit the weight room 4-5 days a week and cram protein shakes. He’s 19 so he will fill out regardless, that’s a given and every guy knows that. It’s much more difficult if your Ezili and you have zero shooting touch. Or your Jordan Bell and your 6-7. Or your Kuzmic and you have really limited athleticism.

The strength department for a rookie center isn’t a new thing or uncharted territory. KG had the same issue, they even had him taking minutes at small forward his first two years because they were worried about the physicality. Dwight came in playing power forward and they had bruising centers next to him so the interior wrestling wouldn’t be an issue. Bosh and Aldridge both played power forward for years before switching over. More recently KP is another example, the weight room got him to the next level because he already had the length, shot, and short dribble that Wiseman has.

I don’t think he’s as far off as some people think, his understanding of man and ball is the thing that’s improved the most. I prefer to have a center play free throw line and below like Ayton and Gobert play. Unfortunately our teams success having Dray through Klay switch has changed a lot of the NBA’s stance on that.

Our situation is also different than most teams who ever have a #2 pick. We are a playoff team with featured guys. Traditionally James would have a larger role with bigger highs and lows to work through, more minutes and better stats. His per 36 is basically the same as Aytons was who joined just a bad team in general which is usually how it goes.

Just from the extra attention and spacing that Klay provides Wiseman is going to have it a lot easier next year. The Warriors need to let him take the shots wherever he gets the best looks. In the meantime I prefer the open outside jumper over a contested post up without deep positioning against someone the same size. Even if he misses a few outside jumpers at least it keeps the paint a little more open for the dribble, the Bucks with Brook get that.

Entirely agree. They very definitely didn't sign him to be a traditional center, they had AD or perhaps even KD in mind, and he has already shown some evidence of the skill they were looking for. They will get a vet center as they have before to do traditional center things if Chriss and Looney aren't enough, there were vague murmurings of Baynes before Klay went down. Hopefully they can teach him to position himself better for contested rebounds, and getting stronger which he will do regardless of training will help.

I don't know how many 19 year olds with virtually no college experience get on to the court in the NBA with fully formed basketball instincts either, most of the great centers of the past had considerably more playing experience than he does. In more modern times with which I am more familiar, the likes of the notoriously crafty Andrew Bogut didn't arrive in the NBA fully formed either, he was seen as more of an offensive player when he was drafted, and was played initially at PF by the Bucks. And the guy who is being contrasted with Wiseman in terms of his readiness for the NBA in Lamelo Ball played a season against men in the Australian league, and didn't look nearly as fully formed there against obviously weaker opposition as he does currently in the actual NBA.
ILOVEIT
RealGM
Posts: 15,038
And1: 3,603
Joined: May 28, 2004

Re: WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1 

Post#1043 » by ILOVEIT » Wed Mar 10, 2021 4:55 pm

michaelm wrote:
DAWill1128 wrote:The narrative surrounding James before the draft amongst critics is actually much different than the current circumstance.

People thought he was a slow footed big guy, which he isn’t. He is actually really fast for a 7 footer or just a center in general.

A lot of people didn’t think he could shoot, he’s actually a good shooter for a center. He’s actually a great shooter for a 19 year old 7-1 guy, really pretty impressive.

People didn’t think he could do anything with the ball, his handle for a center is pretty good.

Most everyone thought he was a good athlete in general outside a few posts that were just non-sensical IMO.

Nobody wanted a brute strong traditional center. People thought that was worthless, ineffective, and outdated with the current game. I never felt that way, I thought a guy like Steven Adams would look good with the guys we have. Bogut looked great even to the end.

Now here we are and the truth is, the guys not enough of a traditional center which was not expected. He doesn’t get deep enough position when catching the ball. He’s not strong on box outs, he’s in a less than favorable position when the ball comes off the rim. When he attacks with the dribble or posts up his handle and moves look fine but his finishes are kinda weak where he gets nudged off his release.

Like someone said earlier, he doesn’t have enough Kanter in him. He doesn’t quite understand how to use a power game to get little leverage advantages around the hoop. He’s more of a run and jump guy.

But having a guy who can run and jump at 7-1 guy with a with a 7-6 wingspan who can shoot the outside shot and has a decent handle is a great position to start for a center.

If you drafted a center and his biggest room for improvement was in the strength department to battle inside that would be the most favorable thing to need to work on. You can have a guy hit the weight room 4-5 days a week and cram protein shakes. He’s 19 so he will fill out regardless, that’s a given and every guy knows that. It’s much more difficult if your Ezili and you have zero shooting touch. Or your Jordan Bell and your 6-7. Or your Kuzmic and you have really limited athleticism.

The strength department for a rookie center isn’t a new thing or uncharted territory. KG had the same issue, they even had him taking minutes at small forward his first two years because they were worried about the physicality. Dwight came in playing power forward and they had bruising centers next to him so the interior wrestling wouldn’t be an issue. Bosh and Aldridge both played power forward for years before switching over. More recently KP is another example, the weight room got him to the next level because he already had the length, shot, and short dribble that Wiseman has.

I don’t think he’s as far off as some people think, his understanding of man and ball is the thing that’s improved the most. I prefer to have a center play free throw line and below like Ayton and Gobert play. Unfortunately our teams success having Dray through Klay switch has changed a lot of the NBA’s stance on that.

Our situation is also different than most teams who ever have a #2 pick. We are a playoff team with featured guys. Traditionally James would have a larger role with bigger highs and lows to work through, more minutes and better stats. His per 36 is basically the same as Aytons was who joined just a bad team in general which is usually how it goes.

Just from the extra attention and spacing that Klay provides Wiseman is going to have it a lot easier next year. The Warriors need to let him take the shots wherever he gets the best looks. In the meantime I prefer the open outside jumper over a contested post up without deep positioning against someone the same size. Even if he misses a few outside jumpers at least it keeps the paint a little more open for the dribble, the Bucks with Brook get that.

Entirely agree. They very definitely didn't sign him to be a traditional center, they had AD or perhaps even KD in mind, and he has already shown some evidence of the skill they were looking for. They will get a vet center as they have before to do traditional center things if Chriss and Looney aren't enough, there were vague murmurings of Baynes before Klay went down. Hopefully they can teach him to position himself better for contested rebounds, and getting stronger which he will do regardless of training will help.

I don't know how many 19 year olds with virtually no college experience get on to the court in the NBA with fully formed basketball instincts either, most of the great centers of the past had considerably more playing experience than he does. In more modern times with which I am more familiar, the likes of the notoriously crafty Andrew Bogut didn't arrive in the NBA fully formed either, he was seen as more of an offensive player when he was drafted, and was played initially at PF by the Bucks. And the guy who is being contrasted with Wiseman in terms of his readiness for the NBA in Lamelo Ball played a season against men in the Australian league, and didn't look nearly as fully formed there against obviously weaker opposition as he does currently in the actual NBA.


Nice posts. All comes down to Curry's window and how much this 19 year old project adds to that run.
If after a full off season Wiseman comes back as a more polished Gem...Ding Ding Ding...winner!
If he comes back as sort of the lost loveable kid again for the full year...and continues to be like that in year three....Warriors would have been better trading him (with Wolves pick) for Beal etc.

I guess I need to stop worrying about championship windows and just enjoy the game lol
2021/22 - The return of the Ring.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,065
And1: 70,245
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1 

Post#1044 » by clyde21 » Wed Mar 10, 2021 6:47 pm

no, it's not just about Steph's window, you could've gotten rookie scale players that would've contributed to that window as well as being a bridge to the next era of Warriors basketball, it's not one or the other

unfortunately we might have done neither with the Wiseman pick, we'll see.
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

Re: WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1 

Post#1045 » by FNQ » Wed Mar 10, 2021 7:03 pm

clyde21 wrote:no, it's not just about Steph's window, you could've gotten rookie scale players that would've contributed to that window as well as being a bridge to the next era of Warriors basketball, it's not one or the other

unfortunately we might have done neither with the Wiseman pick, we'll see.


jeezus **** can this narrative die already?

Steph was never the window we were worried about. Never. Never ever.

The second Draymond isn't the same Draymond we knew, we're in deep trouble. There is no replacement behind him, there's very few in the league who could. And without him our defense is brutal and our offense can be stagnant. He is the ticking clock, not Steph.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,065
And1: 70,245
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1 

Post#1046 » by clyde21 » Wed Mar 10, 2021 8:21 pm

FNQ wrote:
clyde21 wrote:no, it's not just about Steph's window, you could've gotten rookie scale players that would've contributed to that window as well as being a bridge to the next era of Warriors basketball, it's not one or the other

unfortunately we might have done neither with the Wiseman pick, we'll see.


jeezus **** can this narrative die already?

Steph was never the window we were worried about. Never. Never ever.

The second Draymond isn't the same Draymond we knew, we're in deep trouble. There is no replacement behind him, there's very few in the league who could. And without him our defense is brutal and our offense can be stagnant. He is the ticking clock, not Steph.


that's true, Dray's window is even smaller than Steph's and it's the one that people should be worried about more at this point.
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,680
And1: 43,938
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1 

Post#1047 » by zimpy27 » Wed Mar 10, 2021 9:13 pm

FNQ wrote:
clyde21 wrote:no, it's not just about Steph's window, you could've gotten rookie scale players that would've contributed to that window as well as being a bridge to the next era of Warriors basketball, it's not one or the other

unfortunately we might have done neither with the Wiseman pick, we'll see.


jeezus **** can this narrative die already?

Steph was never the window we were worried about. Never. Never ever.

The second Draymond isn't the same Draymond we knew, we're in deep trouble. There is no replacement behind him, there's very few in the league who could. And without him our defense is brutal and our offense can be stagnant. He is the ticking clock, not Steph.


What is the Warriors plan do you think? Make a run with Curry, Klay, Wiggins, Green, Wiseman?
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Warriors Analyst
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,873
And1: 2,707
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1 

Post#1048 » by Warriors Analyst » Wed Mar 10, 2021 9:36 pm

zimpy27 wrote:
FNQ wrote:
clyde21 wrote:no, it's not just about Steph's window, you could've gotten rookie scale players that would've contributed to that window as well as being a bridge to the next era of Warriors basketball, it's not one or the other

unfortunately we might have done neither with the Wiseman pick, we'll see.


jeezus **** can this narrative die already?

Steph was never the window we were worried about. Never. Never ever.

The second Draymond isn't the same Draymond we knew, we're in deep trouble. There is no replacement behind him, there's very few in the league who could. And without him our defense is brutal and our offense can be stagnant. He is the ticking clock, not Steph.


What is the Warriors plan do you think? Make a run with Curry, Klay, Wiggins, Green, Wiseman?


I hope not. Wiseman isn't going to be able to close in the playoffs this year or the next. Our best bet for being serious contenders is to use Wiseman and the Minnesota pick to get a major difference maker. But if you want to hedge your bets and still be able to try and build for life after Steph, just trade Wiseman and keep the Minnesota pick. Christian Wood is the ideal get, but I fear the FO is attached to Wiseman. Maybe not the FO, but Joe Lacob for sure. Shortly after we drafted Wiseman, he said that he believed Wiseman is the best big man prospect of the last decade, which is just... delusional.
User avatar
Onus
RealGM
Posts: 23,607
And1: 7,084
Joined: May 12, 2008
Location: NOA

Re: WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1 

Post#1049 » by Onus » Wed Mar 10, 2021 9:37 pm

clyde21 wrote:
FNQ wrote:
clyde21 wrote:no, it's not just about Steph's window, you could've gotten rookie scale players that would've contributed to that window as well as being a bridge to the next era of Warriors basketball, it's not one or the other

unfortunately we might have done neither with the Wiseman pick, we'll see.


jeezus **** can this narrative die already?

Steph was never the window we were worried about. Never. Never ever.

The second Draymond isn't the same Draymond we knew, we're in deep trouble. There is no replacement behind him, there's very few in the league who could. And without him our defense is brutal and our offense can be stagnant. He is the ticking clock, not Steph.


that's true, Dray's window is even smaller than Steph's and it's the one that people should be worried about more at this point.

Isn’t wiseman a dray replacement. If wiseman turns into gobert defensively we’d be fine. Our offense would have to change but it’s not like draymond doesn’t have his limitations on that end anyway.
Most 4th Quarter Points in Final since 1991
1995 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5
2000 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5 (61.1% TS)
2015 Stephen Curry 10.8 (75.1% TS)
1997 Michael Jordan 10.7 (55.1% TS)
1998 Michael Jordan 10.6 (50.6% TS)
2011 Dirk Nowitzki 10.3 (68.0% TS)
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

Re: WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1 

Post#1050 » by FNQ » Wed Mar 10, 2021 9:45 pm

Onus wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
FNQ wrote:
jeezus **** can this narrative die already?

Steph was never the window we were worried about. Never. Never ever.

The second Draymond isn't the same Draymond we knew, we're in deep trouble. There is no replacement behind him, there's very few in the league who could. And without him our defense is brutal and our offense can be stagnant. He is the ticking clock, not Steph.


that's true, Dray's window is even smaller than Steph's and it's the one that people should be worried about more at this point.

Isn’t wiseman a dray replacement. If wiseman turns into gobert defensively we’d be fine. Our offense would have to change but it’s not like draymond doesn’t have his limitations on that end anyway.


We cant just be like "If Wiseman turns into a DPOY candidate".. I mean yeah, that'd be great, but is that really what we're banking on?

Keep in mind - Dray's not just a defensive anchor - he's the QB. I've watched enough of the Jazz to know that while Gobert has amazing instincts, he's not literally placing people in the right spots like Dray is, in game. I dont know that there is another Draymond out there.

Thats why there should be urgency. There is no title team without Draymond.
Warriors Analyst
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,873
And1: 2,707
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1 

Post#1051 » by Warriors Analyst » Wed Mar 10, 2021 9:49 pm

FNQ wrote:
Onus wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
that's true, Dray's window is even smaller than Steph's and it's the one that people should be worried about more at this point.

Isn’t wiseman a dray replacement. If wiseman turns into gobert defensively we’d be fine. Our offense would have to change but it’s not like draymond doesn’t have his limitations on that end anyway.


We cant just be like "If Wiseman turns into a DPOY candidate".. I mean yeah, that'd be great, but is that really what we're banking on?


If Wiseman is Gobert, do you really trust him in crunch time against Harden, Dame, Luka, CP3, or those types of players? I don't think Wiseman will be a DPOY, but my hope is he's not limited to being just a drop center. He got cooked against Portland in a drop scheme the first time we played them. The next game where Steph dropped 62, Wiseman was more aggressive meeting Dame and CJ up on the perimeter and looked a lot more agile. He doesn't seem like the type of athlete to have the quick twitch reflexes to be a great defender from a standstill, but I think there's some hope for his switchability if he can stay in constant motion.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,065
And1: 70,245
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1 

Post#1052 » by clyde21 » Wed Mar 10, 2021 9:49 pm

Onus wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
FNQ wrote:
jeezus **** can this narrative die already?

Steph was never the window we were worried about. Never. Never ever.

The second Draymond isn't the same Draymond we knew, we're in deep trouble. There is no replacement behind him, there's very few in the league who could. And without him our defense is brutal and our offense can be stagnant. He is the ticking clock, not Steph.


that's true, Dray's window is even smaller than Steph's and it's the one that people should be worried about more at this point.

Isn’t wiseman a dray replacement. If wiseman turns into gobert defensively we’d be fine. Our offense would have to change but it’s not like draymond doesn’t have his limitations on that end anyway.


huh? how the heck is Wiseman a Dray replacement? Wiseman does nothing that Dray does. :-?
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

Re: WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1 

Post#1053 » by FNQ » Wed Mar 10, 2021 9:49 pm

zimpy27 wrote:
FNQ wrote:
clyde21 wrote:no, it's not just about Steph's window, you could've gotten rookie scale players that would've contributed to that window as well as being a bridge to the next era of Warriors basketball, it's not one or the other

unfortunately we might have done neither with the Wiseman pick, we'll see.


jeezus **** can this narrative die already?

Steph was never the window we were worried about. Never. Never ever.

The second Draymond isn't the same Draymond we knew, we're in deep trouble. There is no replacement behind him, there's very few in the league who could. And without him our defense is brutal and our offense can be stagnant. He is the ticking clock, not Steph.


What is the Warriors plan do you think? Make a run with Curry, Klay, Wiggins, Green, Wiseman?


Sounds ridiculous right? I can't imagine it is their plan.

But like I said somewhere else.. Kerr just announced that Wiseman was gonna get more playing time, right as he's been mired in his worst chunk of his rookie season. A couple days later, our team, through sources to local media, talks about what it would take to get Wiseman in a trade, unprompted.

So my guess is that yes, they are actively looking to make a deal and that Wiseman is likely a key element in that. Obvious talent there, but where will we be when he realizes it? Will he even fit with the stars?
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

Re: WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1 

Post#1054 » by FNQ » Wed Mar 10, 2021 9:52 pm

Warriors Analyst wrote:
FNQ wrote:
Onus wrote:Isn’t wiseman a dray replacement. If wiseman turns into gobert defensively we’d be fine. Our offense would have to change but it’s not like draymond doesn’t have his limitations on that end anyway.


We cant just be like "If Wiseman turns into a DPOY candidate".. I mean yeah, that'd be great, but is that really what we're banking on?


If Wiseman is Gobert, do you really trust him in crunch time against Harden, Dame, Luka, CP3, or those types of players? I don't think Wiseman will be a DPOY, but my hope is he's not limited to being just a drop center. He got cooked against Portland in a drop scheme the first time we played them. The next game where Steph dropped 62, Wiseman was more aggressive meeting Dame and CJ up on the perimeter and looked a lot more agile. He doesn't seem like the type of athlete to have the quick twitch reflexes to be a great defender from a standstill, but I think there's some hope for his switchability if he can stay in constant motion.


I don't, but I dont think we should see them as a linear replacement either. Draymond is an undersized PF, Wiseman might be an oversized C. Wiseman isn't going to run the offense. He's not going to QB the defense. But can he anchor a defense? Quite possibly in time. Problem is right now, the game is way too fast for him. When will it slow down? Will it slow down?

As far as him being taken advantage of on switches.. we were just fine with Zaza, McGee, and Bogut.. not exactly a fleet-footed trio there. So I'm not terribly worried about him on PnRs yet
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,065
And1: 70,245
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1 

Post#1055 » by clyde21 » Wed Mar 10, 2021 9:56 pm

there is no plan here, at least not an obvious one, other than we 'we think Wiseman is the best player on the board and we will draft him regardless of our personnel and scheme'

i'm all for BPA when it's called for and the guy on the board is so much better than everyone else where you have to ignore need/fit/personnel and pull the trigger, but this was a bad decision from the get go...again this doesn't mean Wiseman isn't going to be a good player down the road...but he doesn't fit any good reasoning why we need to take him #2, not from a fit standpoint, not from a BPA standpoint, nothing.
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,065
And1: 70,245
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1 

Post#1056 » by clyde21 » Wed Mar 10, 2021 10:00 pm

FNQ wrote:
Warriors Analyst wrote:
FNQ wrote:
We cant just be like "If Wiseman turns into a DPOY candidate".. I mean yeah, that'd be great, but is that really what we're banking on?


If Wiseman is Gobert, do you really trust him in crunch time against Harden, Dame, Luka, CP3, or those types of players? I don't think Wiseman will be a DPOY, but my hope is he's not limited to being just a drop center. He got cooked against Portland in a drop scheme the first time we played them. The next game where Steph dropped 62, Wiseman was more aggressive meeting Dame and CJ up on the perimeter and looked a lot more agile. He doesn't seem like the type of athlete to have the quick twitch reflexes to be a great defender from a standstill, but I think there's some hope for his switchability if he can stay in constant motion.


I don't, but I dont think we should see them as a linear replacement either. Draymond is an undersized PF, Wiseman might be an oversized C. Wiseman isn't going to run the offense. He's not going to QB the defense. But can he anchor a defense? Quite possibly in time. Problem is right now, the game is way too fast for him. When will it slow down? Will it slow down?

As far as him being taken advantage of on switches.. we were just fine with Zaza, McGee, and Bogut.. not exactly a fleet-footed trio there. So I'm not terribly worried about him on PnRs yet


true, but none of those guys played big minutes for us, if we're expecting Wiseman to be a 36 minute player for us (and I sure hope so if you're taking the dude 2nd overall) it's a different ask altogether
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
Warriors Analyst
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,873
And1: 2,707
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1 

Post#1057 » by Warriors Analyst » Wed Mar 10, 2021 10:07 pm

clyde21 wrote:
FNQ wrote:
Warriors Analyst wrote:
If Wiseman is Gobert, do you really trust him in crunch time against Harden, Dame, Luka, CP3, or those types of players? I don't think Wiseman will be a DPOY, but my hope is he's not limited to being just a drop center. He got cooked against Portland in a drop scheme the first time we played them. The next game where Steph dropped 62, Wiseman was more aggressive meeting Dame and CJ up on the perimeter and looked a lot more agile. He doesn't seem like the type of athlete to have the quick twitch reflexes to be a great defender from a standstill, but I think there's some hope for his switchability if he can stay in constant motion.


I don't, but I dont think we should see them as a linear replacement either. Draymond is an undersized PF, Wiseman might be an oversized C. Wiseman isn't going to run the offense. He's not going to QB the defense. But can he anchor a defense? Quite possibly in time. Problem is right now, the game is way too fast for him. When will it slow down? Will it slow down?

As far as him being taken advantage of on switches.. we were just fine with Zaza, McGee, and Bogut.. not exactly a fleet-footed trio there. So I'm not terribly worried about him on PnRs yet


true, but none of those guys played big minutes for us, if we're expecting Wiseman to be a 36 minute player for us (and I sure hope so if you're taking the dude 2nd overall) it's a different ask altogether


Right. We closed with Looney, Bell, or Green at C in the only series we had to fight to win.
User avatar
Onus
RealGM
Posts: 23,607
And1: 7,084
Joined: May 12, 2008
Location: NOA

Re: WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1 

Post#1058 » by Onus » Wed Mar 10, 2021 11:04 pm

clyde21 wrote:
Onus wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
that's true, Dray's window is even smaller than Steph's and it's the one that people should be worried about more at this point.

Isn’t wiseman a dray replacement. If wiseman turns into gobert defensively we’d be fine. Our offense would have to change but it’s not like draymond doesn’t have his limitations on that end anyway.


huh? how the heck is Wiseman a Dray replacement? Wiseman does nothing that Dray does. :-?

They both play center
Most 4th Quarter Points in Final since 1991
1995 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5
2000 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5 (61.1% TS)
2015 Stephen Curry 10.8 (75.1% TS)
1997 Michael Jordan 10.7 (55.1% TS)
1998 Michael Jordan 10.6 (50.6% TS)
2011 Dirk Nowitzki 10.3 (68.0% TS)
User avatar
Onus
RealGM
Posts: 23,607
And1: 7,084
Joined: May 12, 2008
Location: NOA

Re: WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1 

Post#1059 » by Onus » Wed Mar 10, 2021 11:13 pm

Warriors Analyst wrote:
FNQ wrote:
Onus wrote:Isn’t wiseman a dray replacement. If wiseman turns into gobert defensively we’d be fine. Our offense would have to change but it’s not like draymond doesn’t have his limitations on that end anyway.


We cant just be like "If Wiseman turns into a DPOY candidate".. I mean yeah, that'd be great, but is that really what we're banking on?


If Wiseman is Gobert, do you really trust him in crunch time against Harden, Dame, Luka, CP3, or those types of players? I don't think Wiseman will be a DPOY, but my hope is he's not limited to being just a drop center. He got cooked against Portland in a drop scheme the first time we played them. The next game where Steph dropped 62, Wiseman was more aggressive meeting Dame and CJ up on the perimeter and looked a lot more agile. He doesn't seem like the type of athlete to have the quick twitch reflexes to be a great defender from a standstill, but I think there's some hope for his switchability if he can stay in constant motion.

The hope is that wiseman can make an impact on defense like gobert. Whether he can switch or not can make him better and would actually not be taken advantage of. But you don’t draft someone who is 7’1” with a 7’6” ws and don’t hope he can’t be an impact player on defense.
Most 4th Quarter Points in Final since 1991
1995 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5
2000 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5 (61.1% TS)
2015 Stephen Curry 10.8 (75.1% TS)
1997 Michael Jordan 10.7 (55.1% TS)
1998 Michael Jordan 10.6 (50.6% TS)
2011 Dirk Nowitzki 10.3 (68.0% TS)
User avatar
Onus
RealGM
Posts: 23,607
And1: 7,084
Joined: May 12, 2008
Location: NOA

Re: WISEMAN EXPECTATIONS: Year 1 

Post#1060 » by Onus » Wed Mar 10, 2021 11:17 pm

FNQ wrote:
Warriors Analyst wrote:
FNQ wrote:
We cant just be like "If Wiseman turns into a DPOY candidate".. I mean yeah, that'd be great, but is that really what we're banking on?


If Wiseman is Gobert, do you really trust him in crunch time against Harden, Dame, Luka, CP3, or those types of players? I don't think Wiseman will be a DPOY, but my hope is he's not limited to being just a drop center. He got cooked against Portland in a drop scheme the first time we played them. The next game where Steph dropped 62, Wiseman was more aggressive meeting Dame and CJ up on the perimeter and looked a lot more agile. He doesn't seem like the type of athlete to have the quick twitch reflexes to be a great defender from a standstill, but I think there's some hope for his switchability if he can stay in constant motion.


I don't, but I dont think we should see them as a linear replacement either. Draymond is an undersized PF, Wiseman might be an oversized C. Wiseman isn't going to run the offense. He's not going to QB the defense. But can he anchor a defense? Quite possibly in time. Problem is right now, the game is way too fast for him. When will it slow down? Will it slow down?

As far as him being taken advantage of on switches.. we were just fine with Zaza, McGee, and Bogut.. not exactly a fleet-footed trio there. So I'm not terribly worried about him on PnRs yet

The goal for wiseman should be to anchor the defense. I don’t expect him to anchor the offense that’s for sure.
Most 4th Quarter Points in Final since 1991
1995 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5
2000 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5 (61.1% TS)
2015 Stephen Curry 10.8 (75.1% TS)
1997 Michael Jordan 10.7 (55.1% TS)
1998 Michael Jordan 10.6 (50.6% TS)
2011 Dirk Nowitzki 10.3 (68.0% TS)

Return to Golden State Warriors