Fitz better not pick up that Wiggsanity line

Moderators: floppymoose, Sleepy51, Chris Porter's Hair

whatisacenter wrote:
Fitz better not pick up that Wiggsanity line
ILOVEIT wrote:Just watching Warriors beat the Thunder with that epic Curry 40' shot to win the game.
Warriors are 53-5 after that win. Now watching Harrison Barnes during that game....he was awful. Missed several layups...bricked an open 3 to the left of the rim.
Wiggins is on a completely different level than Barnes. He's a natural mover...scorer...more athletic now. Really Wiggins is a all-star caliber talent being asked to be a 3rd option on our team. He will upgrade the Warriors defensively immediately.
Of course I want Giannis over Wiggins....but Wiggins and a top 4 pick... Add Iggy back on this team....I think it's back on track for this dynasty.

ILOVEIT wrote:Just watching Warriors beat the Thunder with that epic Curry 40' shot to win the game.
Warriors are 53-5 after that win. Now watching Harrison Barnes during that game....he was awful. Missed several layups...bricked an open 3 to the left of the rim.
Wiggins is on a completely different level than Barnes. He's a natural mover...scorer...more athletic now. Really Wiggins is a all-star caliber talent being asked to be a 3rd option on our team. He will upgrade the Warriors defensively immediately.
Of course I want Giannis over Wiggins....but Wiggins and a top 4 pick... Add Iggy back on this team....I think it's back on track for this dynasty.
wco81 wrote:Would you trade Wiggins for Aaron Gordon?
wco81 wrote:Would you trade Wiggins for Aaron Gordon?
xdrta+ wrote:Gobert makes $26.5M next year, but then he's an UFA, so I'd say it's more than a little risky.
HiRez wrote:With the Gobert-Mitchell drama still unresolved, Green for Gobert rumors heating up. Probably would have to throw in something like a pick or Paschall to make that happen, but would be an interesting move, one that (unlike most proposed trades) wouldn't significantly hurt us defensively, and in fact you can make a good argument it makes us better defensively overall. I think Draymond has a few advantages over Gobert (passing, BBIQ, fire?), but Gobert would instantly solve our sorely-needed size and rim protection needs emphatically and obviously he's DPOY.
Just for fun, let me ask: would you trade Draymond and our 2020 FRP for Gobert? I love Draymond, but I'd definitely do it.
HiRez wrote:With the Gobert-Mitchell drama still unresolved, Green for Gobert rumors heating up. Probably would have to throw in something like a pick or Paschall to make that happen, but would be an interesting move, one that (unlike most proposed trades) wouldn't significantly hurt us defensively, and in fact you can make a good argument it makes us better defensively overall. I think Draymond has a few advantages over Gobert (passing, BBIQ, fire?), but Gobert would instantly solve our sorely-needed size and rim protection needs emphatically and obviously he's DPOY.
Just for fun, let me ask: would you trade Draymond and our 2020 FRP for Gobert? I love Draymond, but I'd definitely do it.
”Mav_Carter wrote: my list doesn't matter...I'm pretty much wrong on everything...
Return to Golden State Warriors