alamin330 wrote:Would your team be interested in Westbrook and 16 for Wiggins and #2?
Not whatsoever.
Moderators: Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose, Sleepy51
alamin330 wrote:Would your team be interested in Westbrook and 16 for Wiggins and #2?
                                                                                           
               
                   
                   
                                                                      LF75 wrote: It was a dumb idea..And yes I'm a dick.
                                                                                           
               
                   
                   
                                                                      Little Digger wrote:Bogut giving LaMelo Ball massive props again
                                                       
                                                    
                                                                         
                                  Coxy wrote:Can anyone elaborate as to why this guy isn't even being spoken about in most mock drafts as a lotto pick?
Bane looks excellent as a spot up shooter, very under control. He looks like an Eric Gordon type maybe? He's built like a tank.
                                                       
                                                    ShayDee wrote:Coxy wrote:Can anyone elaborate as to why this guy isn't even being spoken about in most mock drafts as a lotto pick?
Bane looks excellent as a spot up shooter, very under control. He looks like an Eric Gordon type maybe? He's built like a tank.
Bro everyone on this board knows I have tried for months. Whether he is on the warriors radar is a mystery but he seems like the perfect fit and will get at least 25mins per knight I believe in his rookie year and will jump Lee and Poole
                                                                         
                                  Coxy wrote:ShayDee wrote:Coxy wrote:Can anyone elaborate as to why this guy isn't even being spoken about in most mock drafts as a lotto pick?
Bane looks excellent as a spot up shooter, very under control. He looks like an Eric Gordon type maybe? He's built like a tank.
Bro everyone on this board knows I have tried for months. Whether he is on the warriors radar is a mystery but he seems like the perfect fit and will get at least 25mins per knight I believe in his rookie year and will jump Lee and Poole
He looks NBA ready. Plays with a lot of control and balance. Strange I haven't even taken notice of him.
Coxy wrote:Can anyone elaborate as to why this guy isn't even being spoken about in most mock drafts as a lotto pick?
Bane looks excellent as a spot up shooter, very under control. He looks like an Eric Gordon type maybe? He's built like a tank.
ShayDee wrote:Bro everyone on this board knows I have tried for months. Whether he is on the warriors radar is a mystery but he seems like the perfect fit and will get at least 25mins per night I believe in his rookie year and will jump Lee and Poole
                                                       
                                                    ChuckDurn wrote:Coxy wrote:Can anyone elaborate as to why this guy isn't even being spoken about in most mock drafts as a lotto pick?
Bane looks excellent as a spot up shooter, very under control. He looks like an Eric Gordon type maybe? He's built like a tank.
Bane has been gradually moving up the mock drafts for the last couple of months, he'll almost certainly be picked in the second half of the first round at this point.
Not saying I agree with the knocks against him, but there have basically been 2:
(A) He's a 4-year player, older than most draftees, and thus probably has limited upside
(B) He has a negative wingspan, i.e. his wingspan is shorter than his height. I think he's 6'5" with a 6'4" wingspan, so the thought is that he's going to struggle to guard players with more length in the NBA.
In many ways, his path reminds me a little bit of Fred Van Vleet....... went to a school which isn't quite in the basketball spotlight, had a great 4-year career, but people were skeptical that he'd be able to compete in the NBA because of being shorter / stockier / not having good length. It took FVV ~3 years to be able to prove himself, it might be shorter for Bane (assuming he does succeed).
azwfan wrote:Okoro at 12?
My god if that happens in reality i sure hope Bob has a plan in place to move up.
                   
                   
                                                                      ”Mav_Carter wrote: my list doesn't matter...I'm pretty much wrong on everything...
                                                                         
                                  HiRez wrote:ShayDee wrote:Bro everyone on this board knows I have tried for months. Whether he is on the warriors radar is a mystery but he seems like the perfect fit and will get at least 25mins per night I believe in his rookie year and will jump Lee and Poole
Problem is there's no way they're picking him at #2 (or even top 10) and there's no way he's still on the board when our #48 pick comes up. And combining our 2 second-round picks probably doesn't move us up enough to get him either. The only way I can see it happening is if we trade down and someone has a pick in the #15-#25 range to send back (Orlando?).
                   
                   
                                                                      HiRez wrote:ShayDee wrote:Bro everyone on this board knows I have tried for months. Whether he is on the warriors radar is a mystery but he seems like the perfect fit and will get at least 25mins per night I believe in his rookie year and will jump Lee and Poole
Problem is there's no way they're picking him at #2 (or even top 10) and there's no way he's still on the board when our #48 pick comes up. And combining our 2 second-round picks probably doesn't move us up enough to get him either. The only way I can see it happening is if we trade down and someone has a pick in the #15-#25 range to send back (Orlando?).
LF75 wrote: It was a dumb idea..And yes I'm a dick.
ChuckDurn wrote:Coxy wrote:Can anyone elaborate as to why this guy isn't even being spoken about in most mock drafts as a lotto pick?
Bane looks excellent as a spot up shooter, very under control. He looks like an Eric Gordon type maybe? He's built like a tank.
Bane has been gradually moving up the mock drafts for the last couple of months, he'll almost certainly be picked in the second half of the first round at this point.
Not saying I agree with the knocks against him, but there have basically been 2:
(A) He's a 4-year player, older than most draftees, and thus probably has limited upside
(B) He has a negative wingspan, i.e. his wingspan is shorter than his height. I think he's 6'5" with a 6'4" wingspan, so the thought is that he's going to struggle to guard players with more length in the NBA.
In many ways, his path reminds me a little bit of Fred Van Vleet....... went to a school which isn't quite in the basketball spotlight, had a great 4-year career, but people were skeptical that he'd be able to compete in the NBA because of being shorter / stockier / not having good length. It took FVV ~3 years to be able to prove himself, it might be shorter for Bane (assuming he does succeed).
                                                                                           
               Mylie10 wrote:Bane is 6’6” and one of the two best three point shooters in this draft.
He would play right away with us and be a perfect fit off our bench.
I predict he goes around 15
Kuya wrote: a good agent collects all the data, including quotes to give them leverage in contract deals.
Return to Golden State Warriors