cpower wrote:SpreeS wrote:xfactor99 wrote:
I think the only way that makes sense is if JK refuses to play ball on a sign and trade and just signs a contract with the Nets for $30-35 mill per. Now instead of letting him leave for nothing, you match it, then wait until December 15 when you can trade him.
On the court like you said it's a terrible fit, but I'd rather do that then just let JK leave for nothing. It's like what the Suns did matching DeAndre Ayton even though he didn't want to be there, they didn't want him there, and they ended up flipping him for Jusuf Nurkic (oops).
DeAndre still was starter center and showed "some stats". In our case we would match 30-35mln contract and Kerr would rot him on the bench...What kind of value do you get from that contract? Everybody knows that Kimunga cant play for small stints, he is rythm player. This contract would become negative very fast...To get something useful you would need to attach picks, but this is totally catashrope...
Nets will pay Kuminga looking at free agents list this summer, no doubt here. And GSW doesnt have good exit from this situation - all 3 options are bad. Kuminga saved his ass in last 4 games and put GSW in very questionable position.
we need to send more incentive for Nets for S/T. 1 FRP + JK and try to negotiate lower contract value would be a good start.
Nets wanted at least 2 picks (including the 2025 one) and that's when jk had some value. Now it's going to take more because jk is the only salary ballast left except now we need to include picks in the post steph years because can't give up the 2026 pick and a swap is useless. So, that's 2027 and possibly 2029 picks at the very least. And if they really wanted jk, they could just send an offer sheet out right.
There is no likely path at cam johnson.