My bad. Somebody else was talking about Beal.Ilovethebay wrote:tarantism wrote:Our core is getting older regardless. Beal will be turning 28 this year and once our core ages out he will have to carry the team on his own. How is that working out for Washington? Trading for Beal means no Wiseman, no other young talent on the team and zero prospects of adding young, affordable talent through the draft for at least 4-5 years (by which time Beal would be entering his mid 30s).Ilovethebay wrote:Who said anything about trading it for players that don’t fit ? Also the draft is a crapshoot. It’s even more of crapshoot if you don’t know when or where you’re picking. This pick could be end up being in the 8-12 range. It could also end up being worse next year. The risks are huge. I’d rather grab a player that I know can help us now rather than trying to luck out on a draft pick. All the while our core gets older.
Its a nightmare scenario, and it is clearly not the direction that the FO want to go. Just be patient, Wiseman looks good and we will likely add another high lottery pick next year. Beal doesn't put us over the top.
Sent from my LM-X220PM using RealGM mobile app
Who said anything about trading Wiseman or trading for Beal? My whole point was that the Minny pick doesn’t guarantee anything for us. I feel like we are 2 pieces away from being a legit contender. One of those pieces should be ripe by next season (Wiseman). The other doesn’t have to come from waiting for the pick to be ready to help out our core. You don’t play “trust the process” when your hand is as good as ours. Maybe I’m just more of a bird in the hand type of guy than others.
Your Beal scenario is a good one in this sense: Wiseman could end up being in a Beal like situation if the pick doesn’t net anyone good in about 3 years when Steph and Klay are losing their battle to Father Time.
Sent from my LM-X220PM using RealGM mobile app