watch1958 wrote:Odd thing is that the strange team last season did play .500 without Steph.whatisacenter wrote:CDM_Stats wrote:
It's capable of a run for sure, I can't overstate how poorly we're using the pieces on the roster right now. Its crazy how different and ineffective the rotations have been the past 2 seasons. The assumption last year was that Kerr was hamstrung by Poole and our otherwise lack of handlers, and we just had to absorb his bad defense/stupidity
But here we are now with a much better fitting team, but Kerr is repeatedly trying to jam the square pegs in the round holes. Its not working, but he's convinced that if he gets that square peg going, it'll fit. Just need patience... its a championship peg!
How does this roster fit well?
It has 7 guards, 1 1/2 wings, and 3 guys who play the 4 and an undersized 5. Six of the players are over 30yo in addition to Saric and Looney who move like they are nearing 40.
I think this roster is a .500 roster that if everything goes well could win 44-45 games tops and maybe the win a first round series.
All bets are off if Curry misses 15+ games this season as I don't think this team is built to go .500 in his absence.
I think they were actually 2 games over .500 without him.