Crazy-Canuck wrote:Klutch and dray already laying the path to the lakers while playing the victim card on the way out. Rich paul is that guy.
Dray apparently that guy too.
Moderators: floppymoose, Sleepy51, Chris Porter's Hair
Crazy-Canuck wrote:Klutch and dray already laying the path to the lakers while playing the victim card on the way out. Rich paul is that guy.
Jester_ wrote:Can we trade Draymond Green for Grayson Allen?
SFrush wrote:killmongrel wrote:Crazy-Canuck wrote:
Is Chris Haynes employed by Klutch? This sounds like something somebody with LeBron's balls in his mouth would say.
I've never liked his reporting.
floppymoose wrote:Too much Vlad. Sixers can't handle it. Solid gold.
Sleepy51 wrote:We appear to be entering the “disease of more” era of this dynasty.
KevinMcreynolds wrote:he's basically a PR guy for Lebron
floppymoose wrote:Too much Vlad. Sixers can't handle it. Solid gold.
Jester_ wrote:Can we trade Draymond Green for Grayson Allen?
Sleepy51 wrote:whatisacenter wrote:Sleepy51 wrote:Assholery aside I like the idea of using Draymond as salary ballast to get value in a Poole trade.
That combo could bring back a heck of a player in return and help with the lux tax crunch
yeah, every team would want the two guys in a combo deal who are beefing with each other.
Draymond is bout to be at $27mm expiring. He can beef his way right out the league. He’s just the salary ballast that lets us trade Poole for a $30mm player while keeping Wiggins. Poole is the asset in the deal
Crazy-Canuck wrote:Klutch and dray already laying the path to the lakers while playing the victim card on the way out. Rich paul is that guy.
whatisacenter wrote:Sleepy51 wrote:whatisacenter wrote:yeah, every team would want the two guys in a combo deal who are beefing with each other.
Draymond is bout to be at $27mm expiring. He can beef his way right out the league. He’s just the salary ballast that lets us trade Poole for a $30mm player while keeping Wiggins. Poole is the asset in the deal
why not just keep and extend Poole/Wiggins and let Draymond expire? or do you think you could get a player better than Poole in your trade scenario?
Sleepy51 wrote:We appear to be entering the “disease of more” era of this dynasty.
Crazy-Canuck wrote:whatisacenter wrote:Sleepy51 wrote:
Draymond is bout to be at $27mm expiring. He can beef his way right out the league. He’s just the salary ballast that lets us trade Poole for a $30mm player while keeping Wiggins. Poole is the asset in the deal
why not just keep and extend Poole/Wiggins and let Draymond expire? or do you think you could get a player better than Poole in your trade scenario?
Dray picks up his player option and poole gets 4/120, its likely wiggins is let go.
clyde21 wrote:Crazy-Canuck wrote:whatisacenter wrote:why not just keep and extend Poole/Wiggins and let Draymond expire? or do you think you could get a player better than Poole in your trade scenario?
Dray picks up his player option and poole gets 4/120, its likely wiggins is let go.
if we let our best 2-way wing go for Dray/Poole i'm gonna be livid.
Crazy-Canuck wrote:Klutch and dray already laying the path to the lakers while playing the victim card on the way out. Rich paul is that guy.
whatisacenter wrote:clyde21 wrote:Crazy-Canuck wrote:
Dray picks up his player option and poole gets 4/120, its likely wiggins is let go.
if we let our best 2-way wing go for Dray/Poole i'm gonna be livid.
so is Draymond an expiring $27M contract in this scenario or not?
I personally think the FO should not extend Wiggins, Poole or Draymond this season. Run it back and let Poole and Wiggins show that they can build on last season and see if Draymond can stay healthy.
HiRez wrote:There is no reason not to extend Poole right now, hell they should have gotten it done last year when he would have been cheaper.
Return to Golden State Warriors