If we give Barnes 20m+
Posted: Fri Jul 1, 2016 1:59 pm
I can't even. Forget everything I thought I knew about his FO. They are just as stupid as the rest of the GMs I make fun of.
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1459346
azwfan wrote:Can we save the whining till AFTER we give Barnes 20m+?
Anyone on a deal that is actually closer to their value is better than Barnes for the max. We were undefeated w/ Rush starting and Rush had a better net rating with the other starters than Barnes did this season. Let that sink in. Brandon. Rush.TylerTurban wrote:In which case I hope the Solomon Hill rumors are true. I'd rather Hill for 13-14mil.
East Bay Sports wrote:azwfan wrote:Can we save the whining till AFTER we give Barnes 20m+?
Plenty of time to do it then as well.
I'm simply saying, for a front office who projects itself as being so cutting edge and head and shoulders above the rest this would completely disprove that and show we are just as stupid as a lot of the teams I previously felt comfortable talking down to. Anyone that has closely watched HB's career and views him as a player worthy of that much of the cap is not someone I am comfortable making decisions for my team. Whoever it is in the FO that supports the kid, be it West or Myers or both, this is enough for me to seriously question their ability to judge basketball value provided by a player. It makes me feel like a lot of what we've found here (Curry, Draymond) may have just been lucky and we will be incredibly lucky to sustain championship caliber success while doing things like maxing out Harrison f'n Barnes
East Bay Sports wrote:Anyone on a deal that is actually closer to their value is better than Barnes for the max. We were undefeated w/ Rush starting and Rush had a better net rating with the other starters than Barnes did this season. Let that sink in. Brandon. Rush.TylerTurban wrote:In which case I hope the Solomon Hill rumors are true. I'd rather Hill for 13-14mil.
If Rush can out perform Barnes in this starting lineup than who can't? Hill certainly could, and for 10-12m cheaper we can sign 1, hell maybe 2 veterans who want to play for a ring. or if we move Bogut we could wind up getting a big C upgrade with the money saved ie Pau or Horford
azwfan wrote:East Bay Sports wrote:azwfan wrote:Can we save the whining till AFTER we give Barnes 20m+?
Plenty of time to do it then as well.
I'm simply saying, for a front office who projects itself as being so cutting edge and head and shoulders above the rest this would completely disprove that and show we are just as stupid as a lot of the teams I previously felt comfortable talking down to. Anyone that has closely watched HB's career and views him as a player worthy of that much of the cap is not someone I am comfortable making decisions for my team. Whoever it is in the FO that supports the kid, be it West or Myers or both, this is enough for me to seriously question their ability to judge basketball value provided by a player. It makes me feel like a lot of what we've found here (Curry, Draymond) may have just been lucky and we will be incredibly lucky to sustain championship caliber success while doing things like maxing out Harrison f'n Barnes
The point is you're getting all worked up BEFORE there is even a reason to get worked up. Nothing has happened yet.
KayZee wrote:I would pay DWade the max over Barnes in a millisecond
East Bay Sports wrote:azwfan wrote:Can we save the whining till AFTER we give Barnes 20m+?
Plenty of time to do it then as well.
I'm simply saying, for a front office who projects itself as being so cutting edge and head and shoulders above the rest this would completely disprove that and show we are just as stupid as a lot of the teams I previously felt comfortable talking down to. Anyone that has closely watched HB's career and views him as a player worthy of that much of the cap is not someone I am comfortable making decisions for my team. Whoever it is in the FO that supports the kid, be it West or Myers or both, this is enough for me to seriously question their ability to judge basketball value provided by a player. It makes me feel like a lot of what we've found here (Curry, Draymond) may have just been lucky and we will be incredibly lucky to sustain championship caliber success while doing things like maxing out Harrison f'n Barnes
azwfan wrote:East Bay Sports wrote:Anyone on a deal that is actually closer to their value is better than Barnes for the max. We were undefeated w/ Rush starting and Rush had a better net rating with the other starters than Barnes did this season. Let that sink in. Brandon. Rush.TylerTurban wrote:In which case I hope the Solomon Hill rumors are true. I'd rather Hill for 13-14mil.
If Rush can out perform Barnes in this starting lineup than who can't? Hill certainly could, and for 10-12m cheaper we can sign 1, hell maybe 2 veterans who want to play for a ring. or if we move Bogut we could wind up getting a big C upgrade with the money saved ie Pau or Horford
I agree. Our focus should be on improving our bigs. I don't see Barnes as a difficult player to replace.
Black Falcon wrote:azwfan wrote:East Bay Sports wrote:Anyone on a deal that is actually closer to their value is better than Barnes for the max. We were undefeated w/ Rush starting and Rush had a better net rating with the other starters than Barnes did this season. Let that sink in. Brandon. Rush.
If Rush can out perform Barnes in this starting lineup than who can't? Hill certainly could, and for 10-12m cheaper we can sign 1, hell maybe 2 veterans who want to play for a ring. or if we move Bogut we could wind up getting a big C upgrade with the money saved ie Pau or Horford
I agree. Our focus should be on improving our bigs. I don't see Barnes as a difficult player to replace.
Ok then. Who should we sign and for how much?
Black Falcon wrote:azwfan wrote:East Bay Sports wrote:Anyone on a deal that is actually closer to their value is better than Barnes for the max. We were undefeated w/ Rush starting and Rush had a better net rating with the other starters than Barnes did this season. Let that sink in. Brandon. Rush.
If Rush can out perform Barnes in this starting lineup than who can't? Hill certainly could, and for 10-12m cheaper we can sign 1, hell maybe 2 veterans who want to play for a ring. or if we move Bogut we could wind up getting a big C upgrade with the money saved ie Pau or Horford
I agree. Our focus should be on improving our bigs. I don't see Barnes as a difficult player to replace.
Ok then. Who should we sign and for how much?
HiRez wrote:Hill signing $52M/4 in NO by the way.
And rumor is Portland is going after Gasol.
I hope Durant makes up his mind fast or we're going to be left with limited choices.
azwfan wrote:Can we save the whining till AFTER we give Barnes 20m+?
TylerTurban wrote:
As for a Barnes replacement, I'd aim for Allen Crabbe, Marvin Williams, Moe Harkless or even Matt Barnes. I wouldn't pay any of these guys more than 14-15mil per.