RealGM

so there isn't even anything in regards to the D Lo on our website yet

Can't help but think there's a lot more to play out

Quazza wrote:so there isn't even anything in regards to the D Lo on our website yet

Can't help but think there's a lot more to play out

W's can't say (or print) a word for another few days yet.

Who says no to this re-routed trade idea.

Wolves trade - Wiggins / KAT

Warriors trade - Draymond / D-Lo

Wolves lose KAT, but also move Wiggins contract and get Dray a true winner, and D Lo to run the point for the franchise.

Warriors eat Wiggins deal, and lose heart and soul Draybeast, but get KAT to form a 4 headed core of Steph/Klay/Wiggins/KAT.

I truly believe the Wolves wouldn't trade KAT for anything short of Giannis. Not about talent just that he's their guy all the way.

BW32 wrote:I truly believe the Wolves wouldn't trade KAT for anything short of Giannis. Not about talent just that he's their guy all the way.

Until free agency visits.

Coxy wrote:

BW32 wrote:I truly believe the Wolves wouldn't trade KAT for anything short of Giannis. Not about talent just that he's their guy all the way.

Until free agency visits.

Teams like that wait till the final hour tho, Pelicans style.

Twolves say no easily. Draymond and Russell aren’t a playoff team in the west and their goal is to pair Russell with kat

Giannis and Anthony Davis are both going to be up for grabs next year....I hold onto Russel...let the season play out and then at the end of 2020 (or at the trade deadline if AD is saying he's had enough of LeBron...yes!) use Russel AND Draymond....if needed...to land Giannis or AD.

Coxy wrote:Who says no to this re-routed trade idea.

Wolves trade - Wiggins / KAT

Warriors trade - Draymond / D-Lo

Wolves lose KAT, but also move Wiggins contract and get Dray a true winner, and D Lo to run the point for the franchise.

Warriors eat Wiggins deal, and lose heart and soul Draybeast, but get KAT to form a 4 headed core of Steph/Klay/Wiggins/KAT.

I guess you haven't seen my automatic VTB requirement for suggesting Wiggins to the Warriors. He an all time bust dude, don't mention him again.

Coxy wrote:Who says no to this re-routed trade idea.

Wolves trade - Wiggins / KAT

Warriors trade - Draymond / D-Lo

Wolves lose KAT, but also move Wiggins contract and get Dray a true winner, and D Lo to run the point for the franchise.

Warriors eat Wiggins deal, and lose heart and soul Draybeast, but get KAT to form a 4 headed core of Steph/Klay/Wiggins/KAT.

KAT is great offensive weapon but this team will end up with no defensive player. I say both says no .. also Wiggins is a negative player

donkeylips wrote:Twolves say no easily. Draymond and Russell aren’t a playoff team in the west and their goal is to pair Russell with kat

do the Wolves even want to make the playoffs? They fired Thibs after he brought them to the playoffs for the 1st time in 15 years or whatever

Mylie10 wrote:

Coxy wrote:Who says no to this re-routed trade idea.

Wolves trade - Wiggins / KAT

Warriors trade - Draymond / D-Lo

Wolves lose KAT, but also move Wiggins contract and get Dray a true winner, and D Lo to run the point for the franchise.

Warriors eat Wiggins deal, and lose heart and soul Draybeast, but get KAT to form a 4 headed core of Steph/Klay/Wiggins/KAT.

I guess you haven't seen my automatic VTB requirement for suggesting Wiggins to the Warriors. He an all time bust dude, don't mention him again.

But.....highlight dunks?

Coxy wrote:

Mylie10 wrote:

Coxy wrote:Who says no to this re-routed trade idea.

Wolves trade - Wiggins / KAT



Warriors trade - Draymond / D-Lo

Wolves lose KAT, but also move Wiggins contract and get Dray a true winner, and D Lo to run the point for the franchise.

Warriors eat Wiggins deal, and lose heart and soul Draybeast, but get KAT to form a 4 headed core of Steph/Klay/Wiggins/KAT.

I guess you haven't seen my automatic VTB requirement for suggesting Wiggins to the Warriors. He an all time bust dude, don't mention him again.

But.....highlight dunks?

VTB

I like Napier. I don’t know why we pay cash to have the T-wolves get him.

likashing wrote:I like Napier. I don’t know why we pay cash to have the T-wolves get him.

If we're giving the Warriors the benefit of the doubt, I guess it is because they have two players in mind for the vet minimum.

In addition, Napier makes about $225K more than the cost of a 2+ year vet minimum. The Warriors really need that space below the apron for the time being.

I would rather have Green and Russell than Wiggins and Towns. Russell could still take another step ar age 23, for some reason Wiggins has not. Not certain Towns has the foot speed to play in all situations. Wiggins is basically Harrison Barnes.

statsman wrote:

likashing wrote:I like Napier. I don’t know why we pay cash to have the T-wolves get him.

If we're giving the Warriors the benefit of the doubt, I guess it is because they have two players in mind for the vet minimum.

In addition, Napier makes about $225K more than the cost of a 2+ year vet minimum. The Warriors really need that space below the apron for the time being.

Yes, I think they want "real" min guys in order to take advantage of the cap discount from those guys.

Too bad though as Napier is everything we wanted Cook to be.

Wiggins wishes he was Harrison Barnes

I was somewhat excited for Napier. Sad to see him being traded away to save such a small amount of cap

Hoping the Warriors can flip Russell before July 6th. He’s not a great fit on the roster(and apparently the Warriors already know this according to those who cover the team)...and his value is pretty high right now.

I like the suggestions here involving the Wolves for Covington, Teague, and a 1st...or to the Magic for Aaron Gordon. There are probably other examples out there of trades that would make the Warriors better.

Bottom line...if they can flip Russell to land another good young talent that fits better(Aaron Gordon for example) or trade him for a few quality role players that fit well, do it.