ImageImageImageImageImage

Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET

Moderators: Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose, Sleepy51

wco81
RealGM
Posts: 22,098
And1: 9,247
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET 

Post#61 » by wco81 » Fri Mar 6, 2020 6:10 am

azwfan wrote:The youngsters are getting some good experience out there.


Which youngsters?

Ideally they get little playing time other than Paschal.

Lee can’t be taking big shots either next year.
User avatar
Admiral-Kizaru
Veteran
Posts: 2,822
And1: 2,492
Joined: Jun 28, 2017
       

Re: Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET 

Post#62 » by Admiral-Kizaru » Fri Mar 6, 2020 6:11 am

Another one for the tank.
Image
wraith985
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,617
And1: 1,168
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET 

Post#63 » by wraith985 » Fri Mar 6, 2020 6:12 am

Curry 23-7-7 on 6-15, 26 minutes.
Samurai
General Manager
Posts: 8,350
And1: 2,892
Joined: Jul 01, 2014
     

Re: Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET 

Post#64 » by Samurai » Fri Mar 6, 2020 6:12 am

Muscles wrote:Damion Lee is trash.

Lee had a good game - just a bad stretch in the last minute. Wouldn't have been a close game without his 23 points. Definitely could have won tonight if Curry wasn't on a minutes restriction but at least we were able to see the difference Curry makes while still keeping the tank rolling for another game.
azwfan
RealGM
Posts: 15,168
And1: 3,745
Joined: May 21, 2004
     

Re: Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET 

Post#65 » by azwfan » Fri Mar 6, 2020 6:13 am

wco81 wrote:
azwfan wrote:The youngsters are getting some good experience out there.


Which youngsters?

Ideally they get little playing time other than Paschal.

Lee can’t be taking big shots either next year.

All of them. Experience is how they will improve.
LF75 wrote: It was a dumb idea..And yes I'm a dick.
User avatar
oaktownwarriors87
RealGM
Posts: 13,739
And1: 4,354
Joined: Mar 01, 2005
 

Re: Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET 

Post#66 » by oaktownwarriors87 » Fri Mar 6, 2020 6:14 am

floppymoose wrote:Not really sure what Lee is supposed to do differently there?


Sometimes they don't go in. They looked good.
cdubbz wrote:Donte DiVincenzo will outplay Poole this season.
GQ Hot Dog
General Manager
Posts: 8,397
And1: 5,016
Joined: May 15, 2006
Location: On the road...
     

Re: Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET 

Post#67 » by GQ Hot Dog » Fri Mar 6, 2020 6:25 am

oaktownwarriors87 wrote:
floppymoose wrote:Not really sure what Lee is supposed to do differently there?


Sometimes they don't go in. They looked good.


I really don't understand why some Warriors fans must call a guy who had two torn ACLs and who's fought his way into a contributing role on an NBA roster "trash".
The hottest of takes...
Jester_ wrote:Hot take: Moses Moody shows the potential to be a star/#2 option ala Lauri Markkanen. Both the eye test and the advanced stats show a player with extremely high slope.
HiRez
RealGM
Posts: 13,836
And1: 3,588
Joined: Dec 29, 2011

Re: Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET 

Post#68 » by HiRez » Fri Mar 6, 2020 6:28 am

Awesome to have Steph back! Considering missing 58 games, he looked very good. The change in energy in that building is incredible with him playing.

On the other hand, Poole really, really sucks.
GQ Hot Dog
General Manager
Posts: 8,397
And1: 5,016
Joined: May 15, 2006
Location: On the road...
     

Re: Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET 

Post#69 » by GQ Hot Dog » Fri Mar 6, 2020 6:33 am

The only Warrior with a positive +/- was Paschall at +2. His 8 assists also lead the team. As the offensive focal point of the bench mob next season he's going to win us some games.

Calling it now, Paschall for 6th man of the year next season.
The hottest of takes...
Jester_ wrote:Hot take: Moses Moody shows the potential to be a star/#2 option ala Lauri Markkanen. Both the eye test and the advanced stats show a player with extremely high slope.
freypies
Junior
Posts: 436
And1: 120
Joined: Feb 21, 2017

Re: Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET 

Post#70 » by freypies » Fri Mar 6, 2020 6:40 am

thinkingwarriors wrote:The only Warrior with a positive +/- was Paschall at +2. His 8 assists also lead the team. As the offensive focal point of the bench mob next season he's going to win us some games.

Calling it now, Paschall for 6th man of the year next season.


Your numbers are wrong. Paschall was a +7, Chriss a +5, Mulder a +1. Those were our only three with a positive +/-.

I like Paschall, but I don't think he's ready to be a 6th-8th man. Mostly because of his defense, which will need a whole lot of work to fix. We are consistently worse over the course of the season with him on the court, and it's largely due to his struggles on the defensive end.
GQ Hot Dog
General Manager
Posts: 8,397
And1: 5,016
Joined: May 15, 2006
Location: On the road...
     

Re: Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET 

Post#71 » by GQ Hot Dog » Fri Mar 6, 2020 6:48 am

freypies wrote:
thinkingwarriors wrote:The only Warrior with a positive +/- was Paschall at +2. His 8 assists also lead the team. As the offensive focal point of the bench mob next season he's going to win us some games.

Calling it now, Paschall for 6th man of the year next season.


Your numbers are wrong. Paschall was a +7, Chriss a +5, Mulder a +1. Those were our only three with a positive +/-.

I like Paschall, but I don't think he's ready to be a 6th-8th man. Mostly because of his defense, which will need a whole lot of work to fix. We are consistently worse over the course of the season with him on the court, and it's largely due to his struggles on the defensive end.


He was a big part of why Siakam was 5 of 17. His defense has improved dramatically over the course of the season. He's clearly a smart player with how much he's improved in all facets of the game. If he fixes his 3pt shot over the off season he'll be a force next year.
The hottest of takes...
Jester_ wrote:Hot take: Moses Moody shows the potential to be a star/#2 option ala Lauri Markkanen. Both the eye test and the advanced stats show a player with extremely high slope.
User avatar
Mylie10
RealGM
Posts: 41,240
And1: 9,612
Joined: Sep 16, 2005
Location: * Chokers! *
Contact:
     

Re: Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET 

Post#72 » by Mylie10 » Fri Mar 6, 2020 7:31 am

floppymoose wrote:Not sure Raptors are going far in playoffs. It's pretty clear to me if Steph had some games under his belt with this crew, and no minute restriction, that Raps would have lost.

Those 3 stright turnovers in the no-PG lineup when Steph was out made a big hole.


We only shot like 27% from 3. If we justade a few more throughout the game, we probably would have won this one.

Just think about a simple sub out of Klay for Lee and this ones over.

34 assists is impressive for a bunch of scrubs.
Khoee wrote “
Mav_Carter wrote: my list doesn't matter...I'm pretty much wrong on everything...
User avatar
Mylie10
RealGM
Posts: 41,240
And1: 9,612
Joined: Sep 16, 2005
Location: * Chokers! *
Contact:
     

Re: Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET 

Post#73 » by Mylie10 » Fri Mar 6, 2020 7:33 am

Don't think I've ever seen Curry coach so much on the floor. Good for him.
Khoee wrote “
Mav_Carter wrote: my list doesn't matter...I'm pretty much wrong on everything...
Little Digger
Head Coach
Posts: 6,854
And1: 2,710
Joined: Aug 01, 2010
 

Re: Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET 

Post#74 » by Little Digger » Fri Mar 6, 2020 8:36 am

Loved watching Steph

miss Klay

Damion Lee cares
ILOVEIT—Good 'ol Bob. Two things that will survive the next apocalypse - Cockroaches and Fitz.
User avatar
Coxy
RealGM
Posts: 48,012
And1: 14,661
Joined: Jun 17, 2008
   

Re: Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET 

Post#75 » by Coxy » Fri Mar 6, 2020 9:35 am

Mylie10 wrote:
floppymoose wrote:Not sure Raptors are going far in playoffs. It's pretty clear to me if Steph had some games under his belt with this crew, and no minute restriction, that Raps would have lost.

Those 3 stright turnovers in the no-PG lineup when Steph was out made a big hole.


We only shot like 27% from 3. If we justade a few more throughout the game, we probably would have won this one.

Just think about a simple sub out of Klay for Lee and this ones over.

34 assists is impressive for a bunch of scrubs.


Also replace Bender and Toscanos minutes with Draybeast. We’re going to be good next season.
Upperclass
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,185
And1: 1,770
Joined: Aug 09, 2005

Re: Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET 

Post#76 » by Upperclass » Fri Mar 6, 2020 12:49 pm

Lee did what he was supposed to as the former tank commander
User avatar
KevinMcreynolds
RealGM
Posts: 12,894
And1: 3,337
Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Location: Sacramento
     

Re: Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET 

Post#77 » by KevinMcreynolds » Fri Mar 6, 2020 5:56 pm

Muscles wrote:Damion Lee is trash.


Image
floppymoose wrote:Too much Vlad. Sixers can't handle it. Solid gold.

"I'm a big proponent of footwork. Believe me." ~Jim Barnett
User avatar
Mylie10
RealGM
Posts: 41,240
And1: 9,612
Joined: Sep 16, 2005
Location: * Chokers! *
Contact:
     

Re: Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET 

Post#78 » by Mylie10 » Fri Mar 6, 2020 7:51 pm

We wouldn't even have been in that game without Lee's 3 point shooting. He 2as the only legit guy taking them.

However he turned into the Pumpkin when it mattered most. That's why you don't have bench backups as the guys taking important shots.

He's a deep bench guy. Obviously a piece you look to upgrade, but he also has some lesser value.
Khoee wrote “
Mav_Carter wrote: my list doesn't matter...I'm pretty much wrong on everything...
User avatar
Coxy
RealGM
Posts: 48,012
And1: 14,661
Joined: Jun 17, 2008
   

Re: Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET 

Post#79 » by Coxy » Fri Mar 6, 2020 9:11 pm

Railing on Damian Lee is lame. He plays hard and with more fire and effort than 99% of guys in the league. He’s earning it all. We’re asking more from him then his talent allows. I’m in his corner holding the spit bucket right now, and anyone throwing shade at him can eat my ass.
ILOVEIT
RealGM
Posts: 14,624
And1: 3,407
Joined: May 28, 2004

Re: Game 63: Golden State Warriors (14-48) vs. Toronto Raptors (43-18) - 10:30 PM ET 

Post#80 » by ILOVEIT » Fri Mar 6, 2020 10:54 pm

thinkingwarriors wrote:The only Warrior with a positive +/- was Paschall at +2. His 8 assists also lead the team. As the offensive focal point of the bench mob next season he's going to win us some games.

Calling it now, Paschall for 6th man of the year next season.


lol....I BELIEVE the TNT broadcasters called that first? ;)
2021/22 - The return of the Ring.

Return to Golden State Warriors