ImageImageImageImageImage

TPE/MLE/Draft

Moderators: Sleepy51, Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose

Warriors Analyst
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,848
And1: 2,694
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: TPE/MLE/Draft 

Post#181 » by Warriors Analyst » Tue Oct 27, 2020 4:51 am

Mylie10 wrote:
Coxy wrote:
Hopper15 wrote:The cap says you have an MLE and a trade exception that can be used on more than one player if need be.

I thought my position on Bowman was clear. But, no. I don't...until he can shoot better. Hence, a two way talent for now.



The best case scenerio I see for Bowman is a Patty Mills type, but he'd need to turn into a serious threat from deep to have a shot at that. He's just average as is. Not good enough for the secondary play making ball handler you need on a top ball club.



I don’t see Patty Mills. Mills is more of a scoring point guard than a guy like Bowman who is defense first. Bowman has a fantastic vertical leap, and Mills is but an average athlete. Bowman is like a Football player (American), and Mills is like the crafty guy at the gym who scores on everybody.

I love the moxy of Patty Mills.

If Bowman shot anywhere close to Patty Mills he’s be a total stud, because Bowman is a legit defender. Bulldog type....love that


Bowman's ceiling -- and I don't think he'll hit it -- is Fred VanVleet. Small bulldog of a guard who is a good and rugged defender even against guys who have a size advantage on him. But lots of things have to go right for that to happen, namely for Bowman's shot to make significant improvements. He's a more explosive athlete than VanVleet and so he could have a higher margin for error and have easier access to driving lanes on a lower 3P%, but he needs to be at 35% to make it in the league. If he can get up to 37% from three, he'll be a ten year NBA player. He wasn't a bad floor general and the shot will open up everything for him.
Scoots1994
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,901
And1: 1,023
Joined: Jun 24, 2018
       

Re: TPE/MLE/Draft 

Post#182 » by Scoots1994 » Tue Oct 27, 2020 6:00 am

Warriors Analyst wrote:
Mylie10 wrote:
Coxy wrote:

The best case scenerio I see for Bowman is a Patty Mills type, but he'd need to turn into a serious threat from deep to have a shot at that. He's just average as is. Not good enough for the secondary play making ball handler you need on a top ball club.



I don’t see Patty Mills. Mills is more of a scoring point guard than a guy like Bowman who is defense first. Bowman has a fantastic vertical leap, and Mills is but an average athlete. Bowman is like a Football player (American), and Mills is like the crafty guy at the gym who scores on everybody.

I love the moxy of Patty Mills.

If Bowman shot anywhere close to Patty Mills he’s be a total stud, because Bowman is a legit defender. Bulldog type....love that


Bowman's ceiling -- and I don't think he'll hit it -- is Fred VanVleet. Small bulldog of a guard who is a good and rugged defender even against guys who have a size advantage on him. But lots of things have to go right for that to happen, namely for Bowman's shot to make significant improvements. He's a more explosive athlete than VanVleet and so he could have a higher margin for error and have easier access to driving lanes on a lower 3P%, but he needs to be at 35% to make it in the league. If he can get up to 37% from three, he'll be a ten year NBA player. He wasn't a bad floor general and the shot will open up everything for him.


Bowman shot 45% from 3 his first year at BC. Don't know what happened to him but he was there in the past (and 80% on FT) so it should be possible.
User avatar
Mylie10
RealGM
Posts: 41,240
And1: 9,612
Joined: Sep 16, 2005
Location: * Chokers! *
Contact:
     

Re: TPE/MLE/Draft 

Post#183 » by Mylie10 » Tue Oct 27, 2020 10:12 am

Bowman needs to aim to be Beverly
Khoee wrote “
Mav_Carter wrote: my list doesn't matter...I'm pretty much wrong on everything...
TB
General Manager
Posts: 8,952
And1: 1,150
Joined: Mar 11, 2007

Re: TPE/MLE/Draft 

Post#184 » by TB » Tue Oct 27, 2020 10:49 pm

Mylie10 wrote:Bowman needs to aim to be Beverly


This.

Bowmans rookie numbers are eerily similar to Bev's rookie numbers. With the main difference being:

1) Bev shot the 3 better.
2) Bev advanced number better but likely due to being on a much better team.
3) Bev was 2 years older with 2 years of pro ball experience in Europe.

I'm perfectly fine with Ky as the 3rd PG.
Scoots1994
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,901
And1: 1,023
Joined: Jun 24, 2018
       

Re: TPE/MLE/Draft 

Post#185 » by Scoots1994 » Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:20 pm

Mylie10 wrote:Bowman needs to aim to be Beverly


I can see it.
Hopper15
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,969
And1: 274
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Location: Tried like the dickens

Re: TPE/MLE/Draft 

Post#186 » by Hopper15 » Sat Oct 31, 2020 1:55 am

So with the tax staying at $132M instead of the projected $139M, my original projection of $14.4M in salary to be used on two vets is now down to $7.4M total. Yikes. That would still be $85M in luxury taxes and a near $250M in gross payroll. After that, every payroll dollar spent is an additional $5 of tax.
User avatar
Mylie10
RealGM
Posts: 41,240
And1: 9,612
Joined: Sep 16, 2005
Location: * Chokers! *
Contact:
     

Re: TPE/MLE/Draft 

Post#187 » by Mylie10 » Sat Oct 31, 2020 2:11 am

I say force Lacob to take it in the shorts. If he’s true to his word about being a Title contender, then you do what it takes for your roster to legitimately compete for a Title.

I understand Covid, pre and post. However the Jazz just sold for 1.5 billion. I’m sure Lacob is playing the long game and the Warriors are probably more like 3 billion at least, haven’t looked. But they will recoup everything if they ever sell, so put up or shut up.

Not you Hop
Khoee wrote “
Mav_Carter wrote: my list doesn't matter...I'm pretty much wrong on everything...
User avatar
jason bourne
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,728
And1: 1,602
Joined: Dec 23, 2013
 

Re: TPE/MLE/Draft 

Post#188 » by jason bourne » Sat Oct 31, 2020 3:22 am

n/m
“The most contrarian thing of all is not to oppose the crowd but to think for yourself.” Peter Thiel

ImageImage
User avatar
Mylie10
RealGM
Posts: 41,240
And1: 9,612
Joined: Sep 16, 2005
Location: * Chokers! *
Contact:
     

Re: TPE/MLE/Draft 

Post#189 » by Mylie10 » Sat Oct 31, 2020 4:18 am

Mylie10 wrote:I say force Lacob to take it in the shorts. If he’s true to his word about being a Title contender, then you do what it takes for your roster to legitimately compete for a Title.

I understand Covid, pre and post. However the Jazz just sold for 1.5 billion. I’m sure Lacob is playing the long game and the Warriors are probably more like 3 billion at least, haven’t looked. But they will recoup everything if they ever sell, so put up or shut up.

Not you Hop


Forbes has the Warriors at 4.3 billion right now. So yeah they can afford it.
Khoee wrote “
Mav_Carter wrote: my list doesn't matter...I'm pretty much wrong on everything...
Little Digger
Head Coach
Posts: 6,854
And1: 2,710
Joined: Aug 01, 2010
 

Re: TPE/MLE/Draft 

Post#190 » by Little Digger » Sat Oct 31, 2020 4:21 am

200 million is nothing for the warriors ownership group..they bought the team for 300 million..it’s now worth 4 billion and if they keep winning will easily be worth 10 billion+ in less than 5 years..200 million is too much luxery tax to pay? Lolz

+ Guys like Lacob and Chamath have made billions this year with their private tech companies investments
ILOVEIT—Good 'ol Bob. Two things that will survive the next apocalypse - Cockroaches and Fitz.
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 22,108
And1: 9,254
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: TPE/MLE/Draft 

Post#191 » by wco81 » Sat Oct 31, 2020 5:43 am

Problem is they got no income coming at Chase. Not just no NBA games but also no concerts and other events which would be exempt from BRI money which they'd have to share with the league.

And they must have loans to pay off.

Plus they weren't selling out the place were they before they stopped play in March?
Scoots1994
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,901
And1: 1,023
Joined: Jun 24, 2018
       

Re: TPE/MLE/Draft 

Post#192 » by Scoots1994 » Sat Oct 31, 2020 5:37 pm

Hopper15 wrote:So with the tax staying at $132M instead of the projected $139M, my original projection of $14.4M in salary to be used on two vets is now down to $7.4M total. Yikes. That would still be $85M in luxury taxes and a near $250M in gross payroll. After that, every payroll dollar spent is an additional $5 of tax.


I thought the cap numbers were still up in the air?
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 22,108
And1: 9,254
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: TPE/MLE/Draft 

Post#193 » by wco81 » Sat Oct 31, 2020 6:10 pm

Yeah I'm not seeing reporting on it. Also how could they set cap or luxury tax numbers when they haven't yet decided how many games they will play, which will have a direct effect on revenues?

We've heard they're considering either 72-game season or a 50-game season. But nothing's decided yet. You just see headlines that if they wait a month to start, in mid January, they'd lose hundreds of millions in revenues, maybe more.
Hopper15
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,969
And1: 274
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Location: Tried like the dickens

Re: TPE/MLE/Draft 

Post#194 » by Hopper15 » Sat Oct 31, 2020 6:37 pm

https://nba.nbcsports.com/2020/10/26/report-nba-teams-told-salary-cap-wouldnt-dip-below-109m/

Y'all need to keep up.

They could arbitrarily raise the luxury tax line as I've previously speculated which would benefit the Dubs.
xdrta+
General Manager
Posts: 9,794
And1: 7,248
Joined: Jun 18, 2018

Re: TPE/MLE/Draft 

Post#195 » by xdrta+ » Sat Oct 31, 2020 6:48 pm

Hopper15 wrote:https://nba.nbcsports.com/2020/10/26/report-nba-teams-told-salary-cap-wouldnt-dip-below-109m/

Y'all need to keep up.

They could arbitrarily raise the luxury tax line as I've previously speculated which would benefit the Dubs.


There's no keeping up because there's nothing official yet, just endless speculation. And that same story says if that's the case for the cap the tax line would remain the same.
Hopper15
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,969
And1: 274
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Location: Tried like the dickens

Re: TPE/MLE/Draft 

Post#196 » by Hopper15 » Sat Oct 31, 2020 6:55 pm

I guess the teams find these things out the same time as the gen pop. :dontknow:
Scoots1994
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,901
And1: 1,023
Joined: Jun 24, 2018
       

Re: TPE/MLE/Draft 

Post#197 » by Scoots1994 » Sat Oct 31, 2020 8:49 pm

Hopper15 wrote:https://nba.nbcsports.com/2020/10/26/report-nba-teams-told-salary-cap-wouldnt-dip-below-109m/

Y'all need to keep up.

They could arbitrarily raise the luxury tax line as I've previously speculated which would benefit the Dubs.


All that is is what the teams want, but it's not decided at all yet.
Hopper15
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,969
And1: 274
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Location: Tried like the dickens

Re: TPE/MLE/Draft 

Post#198 » by Hopper15 » Sun Nov 1, 2020 12:40 am

So "told" and "want" mean the same thing? Got it.
Scoots1994
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,901
And1: 1,023
Joined: Jun 24, 2018
       

Re: TPE/MLE/Draft 

Post#199 » by Scoots1994 » Sun Nov 1, 2020 3:48 pm

Hopper15 wrote:So "told" and "want" mean the same thing? Got it.


No, the teams were told what the plan is, but until the NBPA agrees what they were told doesn't matter. It may even be likely, but it's definitely not certain yet. Apparently there is still discussion about the tax being at $139 instead of $132, it may also be much lower if negotiations with the NBPA fall apart.

As an example, politicians often tell the press what they are going to do, when what they are really saying is what they want to do, but until it's actually the law it's not really true.
SinceGatlingWasARookie
RealGM
Posts: 11,334
And1: 2,688
Joined: Aug 25, 2005
Location: Northern California

Re: TPE/MLE/Draft 

Post#200 » by SinceGatlingWasARookie » Thu Nov 5, 2020 6:36 am

I feel no urgency to upgrade Bowman unless Curry is going to play some offguard.

Return to Golden State Warriors