powerball1373 wrote:CDM_Stats wrote:HiRez wrote:I just think they picked up some baller role players and a coach who wasn't too chicken to play them. Curry, Wiggins, Looney, Moody, Kuminga, and some replacement players can complete. Draymond isn't the only player in the league who can pass or play defense and lately he's been as bad as he has been good.
I agree with half of this, but again reiterate my challenge for fans to exclusively watch the off-ball stuff and not worry who has the ball in your hands.
It'll deepen your hated for Poole for sure, but it will show just how important Dray is, and made it very easy to tell that Wiggins would fit here and Oubre never could. Reducing what Dray does to just 'pass or play defense' is missing out on why he's so good at defense and why he's good running the offense. There's a reason why you can't find many comparable players like him.. in fact, he just played one, except that one can also shoot and is way more athletic
There was a time where I thought the Warriors could salvage Ben Simmons and make him something of this type of player, but he appears to be broken beyond repair.
He is one of the few players who really could come in and potentially replace Draymond. I dont think he's broken per se, I think he's miscast. Like imagine Draymond not getting drafted by the Warriors and pairing up with Curry.. throw him on a terrible team and he'd look awful too. Put him on an iso-heavy team and he'd be wasted..
That said, I'd be willing to pay pennies on the dollar for Simmons, give or take some pennies.. but if Curry was ok with it, and if the Nets were willing to take Dray and Poole for Simmons and say.. Cam Thomas (no fkn idea if any of this is legal), then I wouldn't hate it. As long as Simmons' contract lined up with Curry's.. just like Dray, I have no interest in seeing Ben Simmons playing without Curry