Re: List of teams GS could look at if Poole has to be traded. Let me know what you think.
Posted: Sun Jun 4, 2023 6:29 am
A somewhat related video:
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2295063
cladden wrote:HiRez wrote:Finding a trade for only Poole would be nice, but if they have to include Kuminga I’m looking for Dinwiddie + Claxton. Although they both only have 1 year left on their contracts so that could be tricky.
So you're saying you'd rather have Divwiddie and Claxton than Kuminga and Poole? Is this to save Lacob money?
DonaldSanders wrote:It's very hard to tell who will be willing to take a flyer on Poole, it all comes down to a GM who believes he can be rehabilitated to the potential everyone saw before last year (or at times last year when he was doing well). I don't really see a point in speculating on this too much as it will be so GM-specific.
I will say that you can cross any contenders off that list, Poole was #12 in jersey sales and has flashy play -- a weak team that needs some butts in seats/attention + the chance of his upside would be the one to take a flyer on him and probably ask for a future 1st in exchange for 1-2 decent vets they probably won't build around.
SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:Why would Poole have to be traded? Klay is the guy making the big bucks but maybe no team would take Klay. Do we have to do no salary?
SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:Why would Poole have to be traded? Klay is the guy making the big bucks but maybe no team would take Klay. Do we have to do no salary?
SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:Why would Poole have to be traded? Klay is the guy making the big bucks but maybe no team would take Klay. Do we have to do no salary?
Crazy-Canuck wrote:SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:Why would Poole have to be traded? Klay is the guy making the big bucks but maybe no team would take Klay. Do we have to do no salary?
Klay is expiring while poole has 4 more years at 30+ per.