RealGM

Clueless baboon

Jester_ wrote:[x]

Read on Twitter

?t=gEvQlnNLbU9ke0xn1kR1YA[/x]

Clueless baboon

seriuosly, either he lost the plot or he's taking the piss.

where is the follow up question, why did you want to play him less than 30? Why did Klay play 32?

Onus wrote:where is the follow up question, why did you want to play him less than 30? Why did Klay play 32?

Journalists prefer having good relationships rather than actually being a journalist. Part of the give & take which makes this difficult. Not that I blame the journalists as I might do the same if it meant food on my plate, but that's where we are at.

Impuniti wrote:

Onus wrote:where is the follow up question, why did you want to play him less than 30? Why did Klay play 32?

Journalists prefer having good relationships rather than actually being a journalist. Part of the give & take which makes this difficult. Not that I blame the journalists as I might do the same if it meant food on my plate, but that's where we are at.

Yea I know

Curry's response to the same question was muddied...we will see if his minutes ramp up from here on out or not.

Always had a little problem with Kerr’s adaptability under pressure but man the wheels have really fallen off this year

He’s really stuck with Warriors tradition in that he’s doing the absolute worst on the way out. But unlike Nellie and Jackson before him, he’s freshly signed an extension…

9 man rotation and our best player gets less than 30 minutes. A bench player got more minutes than him. How could having our best player on the floor not help?

It’s rather incredible that they gave Kerr an extension and not only an extension but the highest paid coach in the league.

Saw his response last night and had to put my phone down. Kerr is not serious about winning games. When your star player says he is willing to play more minutes or doesn't understand why he sat so long, there is a disconnect. He is trusting Podz, Klay, and CP3 too damn much.

jaymo123 wrote:Saw his response last night and had to put my phone down. Kerr is not serious about winning games. When your star player says he is willing to play more minutes or doesn't understand why he sat so long, there is a disconnect. He is trusting Podz, Klay, and CP3 too damn much.

People here are WAY more upset about Curry's minutes than Curry himself. He said he was 'a little surprised" and that he "played the whole 4th quarter against the Pacer and that didn't work" and that "this didn't work out" and "you need to find something in the middle".

whatisacenter wrote:

jaymo123 wrote:Saw his response last night and had to put my phone down. Kerr is not serious about winning games. When your star player says he is willing to play more minutes or doesn't understand why he sat so long, there is a disconnect. He is trusting Podz, Klay, and CP3 too damn much.

People here are WAY more upset about Curry's minutes than Curry himself. He said he was 'a little surprised" and that he "played the whole 4th quarter against the Pacer and that didn't work" and that "this didn't work out" and "you need to find something in the middle".

Lol sorry you think Steph of all people is going to air his grievances about his minutes to the press?

How do you not put Moody in for 10 energy minutes in that game? He's exactly what they need when the energy level dips.

Kerr knows that he can't actually get himself traded out of here and keep the money like Poole, right?

Jester_ wrote:

whatisacenter wrote:

jaymo123 wrote:Saw his response last night and had to put my phone down. Kerr is not serious about winning games. When your star player says he is willing to play more minutes or doesn't understand why he sat so long, there is a disconnect. He is trusting Podz, Klay, and CP3 too damn much.

People here are WAY more upset about Curry's minutes than Curry himself. He said he was 'a little surprised" and that he "played the whole 4th quarter against the Pacer and that didn't work" and that "this didn't work out" and "you need to find something in the middle".

Lol sorry you think Steph of all people is going to air his grievances about his minutes to the press?

He is free to go to his coach during the game and say "put me in" if his knickers are in a knot like yours are.

But I know I can come here and set my watch to the same complaints by the usual suspects on the daily....you guys do you....I just don't have it in me to get outraged over a players minutes in a season that was pretty much a throwaway from the jump.

Sleepy51 wrote:Kerr knows that he can't actually get himself traded out of here and keep the money like Poole, right?

But he can get fired and keep the money.

whatisacenter wrote:

Jester_ wrote:

whatisacenter wrote:
People here are WAY more upset about Curry's minutes than Curry himself. He said he was 'a little surprised" and that he "played the whole 4th quarter against the Pacer and that didn't work" and that "this didn't work out" and "you need to find something in the middle".

Lol sorry you think Steph of all people is going to air his grievances about his minutes to the press?

He is free to go to his coach during the game and say "put me in" if his knickers are in a knot like yours are.

But I know I can come here and set my watch to the same complaints by the usual suspects on the daily....you guys do you....I just don't have it in me to get outraged over a players minutes in a season that was pretty much a throwaway from the jump.

You've given up on the season just like the team has. The team isn't chasing wins that much is clear. Winning is not the no 1 priority.

He is right. The difference was playing Wigs at PF. But whole rotation is strangely set. They should beat Wolves by 10+ with correct rotation.

whatisacenter wrote:

jaymo123 wrote:Saw his response last night and had to put my phone down. Kerr is not serious about winning games. When your star player says he is willing to play more minutes or doesn't understand why he sat so long, there is a disconnect. He is trusting Podz, Klay, and CP3 too damn much.

People here are WAY more upset about Curry's minutes than Curry himself. He said he was 'a little surprised" and that he "played the whole 4th quarter against the Pacer and that didn't work" and that "this didn't work out" and "you need to find something in the middle".

Are you seriously that naive that you think Steph of all people is going to throw Steve under the bus like that? How many times has he done that his entire career? What argument is this even?

Why is the best player in the team playing 30 minutes in a must win match when he's not injured or fouled out?

Impuniti wrote:

whatisacenter wrote:

jaymo123 wrote:Saw his response last night and had to put my phone down. Kerr is not serious about winning games. When your star player says he is willing to play more minutes or doesn't understand why he sat so long, there is a disconnect. He is trusting Podz, Klay, and CP3 too damn much.

People here are WAY more upset about Curry's minutes than Curry himself. He said he was 'a little surprised" and that he "played the whole 4th quarter against the Pacer and that didn't work" and that "this didn't work out" and "you need to find something in the middle".

Are you seriously that naive that you think Steph of all people is going to throw Steve under the bus like that? How many times has he done that his entire career? What argument is this even?

Why is the best player in the team playing 30 minutes in a must win match when he's not injured or fouled out?

It doesn’t really matter what you or I believe. If Steph Curry wants to play more minutes, he will.

Big picture is, it doesn’t really matter who or how many minutes players play, this team is mediocre.