Warriors 11-0

BROWN · Post #1 » by **BROWN** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 8:37 pm

Golden State beat the Rockets, 112-95 in Houston last Monday, improving the Warriors record to 11-0 in 2007-08 when holding their opponent below 100 points. Including the playoffs, Golden State has won 24 straight games when allowing 99 points or less, the longest such streak since the Sacramento Kings won 25 in a row from December 22, 2002 to March 29, 2003.

http://www.nba.com/statistics/stats_080107.html

Let's just keep the spurs below 100

Left*My*Heart · Post #2 » by **Left*My*Heart** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 9:17 pm

Which doesn't happen often enough when you give up an average of 107 points a game.

crzy · Post #3 » by **crzy** » Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:11 am

The Warriors win when they play defense.

This is just a shocking revelation.

uweblab · Post #4 » by **uweblab** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 6:22 pm

can't wait for for your next thread.... :roll:

CS707 · Post #5 » by **CS707** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 7:31 pm

Warriors 20-0 when scoring more points than their opponents.

turk3d · Post #6 » by **turk3d** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 7:40 pm

crzyyafrican wrote:The Warriors win when they play defense.

This is just a shocking revelation.

I wish someone would reveal it to the players and the coach. Maybe they'd start focusing on it a little more often, .e., maybe instead of trying to top 120 every game, they'll try to keep the other team in the 90's.

blizzard · Post #7 » by **blizzard** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 9:27 pm

gst8 wrote:Warriors 20-0 when scoring more points than their opponents.

lel

BROWN · Post #8 » by **BROWN** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 11:59 pm

uweblab wrote:can't wait for for your next thread....

I try my best everytime.

-bob- · Post #9 » by **-bob-** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:47 am

the Spurs had won 33 in a row when scoring +100, till they met the mighty Warriors. :lift:

dareru · Post #10 » by **dareru** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:35 pm

-bob- wrote:the Spurs had won 33 in a row when scoring +100, till they met the mighty Warriors.

suckaz. San Antonio ain't got nothin' on us.