ImageImageImageImageImage

Game Thread: Sacramento @ Golden State 7:30pm

Moderators: Sleepy51, Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose

What decade was considered "Roaring"?

1950s
2
7%
1970s
1
3%
1920s
23
77%
1980s
1
3%
1940s
0
No votes
1930s
0
No votes
1990s
3
10%
 
Total votes: 30

User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,007
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

 

Post#381 » by FNQ » Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:09 pm

This whole season we've played down to our competition.. this is dating back to the PHI game.

PHI, WAS (no Arenas), SAC, MIA, MEM, MIN (twice), IND, CHI, NJ, NY

Lost to NJ, IND, MIN, CHI (no Deng/Gordon/Hinrich)

It was happening early, just not as often... its snowballing right now, to the point where a game where we dominate sticks out like a sore thumb (CHA). It's declining rapidly...

What we're doing is becoming the Mavs of the early century... A team with 4 or 5 good players, a bunch of scrubs, winning 50 games... Their problem, 8 years later, is the same it was in 2000 - lack of an interior presence. That is what we are building towards... :banghead:
St.Nick
Banned User
Posts: 15,954
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 21, 2004
Location: Paris, France

 

Post#382 » by St.Nick » Sun Feb 10, 2008 8:04 pm

Didn't we just add Webber to play in the post?

And didn't we draft Brandan to be our PF of the future (just for a second assume he needs time to mature and will be ready next year)?

Shouldn't the small ball haters be happy with our two biggest additions this season?

Return to Golden State Warriors