Of course, Webber has been no shining beacon. I hope he improves as he gets in game shape. And if not, I assume his minutes will be even more constricted than they are now (13.7 MPG). But right now, Biedrins is playing more than C-Webb, which is as it should be.
But it's also not fair to pin all of the Warriors struggles on Webber... there's lots of blame to go around. For one: Baron! What's up with his game lately? He's still the Warriors' best player, but he's been MIA for a while, and it's amazing the Warriors have been able to win "without" him.
Vanhoo wrote:He didn't put Biedrins in that group that Webber is better then, he's talking about the centers he doesn't even play ( POB and Kosta ) he says it right in the Q & A with Tim.
People who don't like Nellie shouldn't let it color every observation they make about the team, lest they risk irrelevancy on this board (and if you don't mind that outcome, why not just have a conversation with yourself, off-line?).
Anyone without an agenda can see from several statements Nellie has made (including today on KNBR) that Nellie thinks: Biedrins>Webbber>Al/POB/Kosta (at center). How is that so wrong?
'Laki, defending Nellie and bashing 510 are not the same thing... I'm coming along to the B-Wright should be playing more stance, if for no other reason than because it's clear the Warriors are much better when they play all-out, scrambling defense, and it takes depth to do that over 48 minutes. But that does not mean Nellie hates Biedrins or has some hidden agenda against POB.