Rumour.. Kaman for Beidrins/Harrington
Moderators: Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose, Sleepy51
Rumour.. Kaman for Beidrins/Harrington
-
- Junior
- Posts: 465
- And1: 3
- Joined: Aug 14, 2006
- Location: Tdot
Rumour.. Kaman for Beidrins/Harrington
http://forums.warriorsworld.net/main/msgs/1874032.phtml
Seen this posted on the clippers board
Just reposting here..
Seen this posted on the clippers board
Just reposting here..
- Chris Porter's Hair
- Forum Mod - Warriors
- Posts: 8,868
- And1: 3,707
- Joined: Jul 09, 2004
- Location: San Mateo, CA
Al and Pietrus is interesting. I think we'd get the better end in terms of value and talent, but we'd take a big hit in shooting, and I'm not sure how it would really play out.
Andris and Al is brutal *and* doesn't make sense. The only reason I can fathom for trading Andris would be, "I'm a mad scientist and I only want big men who can shoot and pass". In which case why would you target Kaman, who is a nice player, but it cut from the same mold as Andris?
Andris and Al is brutal *and* doesn't make sense. The only reason I can fathom for trading Andris would be, "I'm a mad scientist and I only want big men who can shoot and pass". In which case why would you target Kaman, who is a nice player, but it cut from the same mold as Andris?

crzyyafrican makes the best sigs, quite frankly
- Warrior-Poet
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,524
- And1: 1
- Joined: Sep 29, 2002
- Location: Berkeley/Silver Spring
- old rem
- RealGM
- Posts: 50,753
- And1: 1,080
- Joined: Jun 14, 2005
- Location: Witness Protection
Pmoney wrote:KAMAN would avg 20 and 20 with 5 blocks |:-)
Yeah..right.....in his dreams.
Nellie would not be that interested in Kaman-and Andris is worth 2 of Kaman anyhow--so we add Harrington and I guess they add a healthy Brand?
I'm not sure I'd even do that.
If The W's really did do this Kaman-Biedrins + Al deal....Old Rem would be on major Jihad to have Newllie + Mullin both fired asap.

...and then both also get kicked in the snatch....

CENSORED... No comment.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,177
- And1: 1,604
- Joined: Jul 15, 2005
Either of those are silly trades though - why would the Clips give up Kaman (to their Western conference foes) for Harrington and a few million in savings? And while the Warriors of course take Kaman if he's being given away, why do they put so much $$ into having TWO starting centers? And why would they even trade Biedrins for Kaman straight up?
ANY deal is unlikely between the Warriors and Clips, especially an unbalanced trade talent-wise.
ANY deal is unlikely between the Warriors and Clips, especially an unbalanced trade talent-wise.
Return to Golden State Warriors