LF75 wrote:Webber was playing well at the time of his injury...I don't understand how his 15 minutes of play a night has been written off as a total disaster...Webber was starting to fit in..Biedrins and Wright were playing well when they were in with him...All the negativitiy poured on this guy and his min. contract confusese me..Especially when the alternative is worse ball movement - gimmick ball with Trainwreck and Horror Story playing major roles.
Actually I totally acknowledged the potential and more importantly the IMPROVEMENT the Webber experiment showed as he loosened up and started to actually move and hustle. The problem is, his body apparently couldn't withstand the rigors of converting layups.
It was an intriguing concept (though it was handled rather clumsily) but ultimately Webber can only contribute what his road-weary body can handle, and it couldn't handle much. I'm judging the experiment on its merrits at this point. Without working lower extremities, there just isn't any merrit to trumpet.
It was/is an experiment. The reality of experimenting is that failure in one of the possible outcomes. Irrespective of the
potential in adding a HEALTHY Strong Forward with great court vision, hands and a 15 footer,
the reality of a gimpy, immoble
and now rehabbing Webber is at this point a failure. (If he gets healthy and can play down the road we can try it again I suppose.) For now, arguing in favor of playing Webber - with no left knee - is just bizzare.
Brandan's case isn't an experiment. It's about playing and developing a talent. The circumstances are totally different. Lumping them together is not going to be fair to Brandan when the homer patrol reads this.