ImageImageImageImageImage

Warriors rely on the three-pointer

Moderators: floppymoose, Sleepy51, Chris Porter's Hair

Twinkie defense
RealGM
Posts: 20,191
And1: 1,609
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Warriors rely on the three-pointer 

Post#1 » by Twinkie defense » Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:28 pm

Just thought this was an interesting article relating to Warriors strategy:

http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_8713268

Although it often looks as if the Warriors' offensive strategy is little more than first guy down the court gets to chuck it, Nelson makes clear there is strategy involved.
"It's just part of the way that we have to play," Nelson said.
He has his reasons.
bballguy50
Veteran
Posts: 2,738
And1: 108
Joined: May 02, 2007
Location: The Yay
       

 

Post#2 » by bballguy50 » Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:52 pm

One of our biggest problems is that we stand around on the perimeter WAY too much just waiting for a pass. Then Baron/Monta/Jax have to force either a drive or shot. I get that it keeps the lane open for the drives, but it hasn't really created for some outstanding passing or rotation on a consistent basis.

Its not so much about moving the ball as moving without the ball.
Abyss Impact
Banned User
Posts: 1,948
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 27, 2008
Location: San Francisco

 

Post#3 » by Abyss Impact » Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:53 pm

Thats why you have guys like Pietrus. He have sick cross over moves that leads to an easy dunk.
Hopper15
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,969
And1: 274
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Location: Tried like the dickens

 

Post#4 » by Hopper15 » Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:59 pm

bballguy50 wrote:One of our biggest problems is that we stand around on the perimeter WAY too much just waiting for a pass.

I think this is kind of backwards. Baron and Jackson (sometimes Ellis) dribble the ball, looking to create and everyone stands around because they don't want to get in the way of their move.
Sid the Squid
Banned User
Posts: 26,062
And1: 9
Joined: Sep 16, 2005

 

Post#5 » by Sid the Squid » Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:10 pm

Gimmick Ball = another 5.1 million for ODB in 08-09
bballguy50
Veteran
Posts: 2,738
And1: 108
Joined: May 02, 2007
Location: The Yay
       

 

Post#6 » by bballguy50 » Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:17 pm

Hopper15 wrote:I think this is kind of backwards. Baron and Jackson (sometimes Ellis) dribble the ball, looking to create and everyone stands around because they don't want to get in the way of their move.


Yeah. That kind of falls in with it though. We stand around either way waiting for a kickout or to stay out of the way. We don't cut anywhere near as well as we should.
Twinkie defense
RealGM
Posts: 20,191
And1: 1,609
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

 

Post#7 » by Twinkie defense » Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:30 pm

bballguy50 wrote:One of our biggest problems is that we stand around on the perimeter WAY too much just waiting for a pass.


I agree. Mullin was great without the ball, I've got to think he's flummoxed at the Warriors being so stagnant sometimes. I think Nellie has recognized it as well - one of his big stated reasons for the failed Webber experiment.

bballguy50 wrote:Its not so much about moving the ball as moving without the ball.


They need both.

Abyss Impact wrote:Thats why you have guys like Pietrus.


Though this has been less of a problem lately, Pietrus was one of the worst offenders - no matter what was going on on offense, he'd run to the little space between the arc and the sideline and just stand there.
User avatar
floppymoose
Senior Mod - Warriors
Senior Mod - Warriors
Posts: 59,230
And1: 17,327
Joined: Jun 22, 2003
Location: Trust your election workers

 

Post#8 » by floppymoose » Fri Mar 28, 2008 5:57 am

Also in the news today, the sun is hot!
User avatar
cavsfan_osiris
Starter
Posts: 2,173
And1: 4
Joined: Oct 28, 2007

 

Post#9 » by cavsfan_osiris » Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:04 am

Good 3point shooting covers up weaknesses a team might have in other areas. It's not rocket science.

The Warriors are good at shooting them and for the most part balancing the thin line between just enough and too many. The only ones I don't like are the lazy ones where there isn't any flow and they just shoot it for the sake of shooting it.
NBA on NBC
Banned User
Posts: 73
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 15, 2008

 

Post#10 » by NBA on NBC » Fri Mar 28, 2008 7:20 am

One game that we should all look back on is the Boston-Golden State game where Baron hit that game winner.

The Warriors had a streak of over 100 games where they made 5 or more 3pt attempts. That streak came to an end against the Celtics but we still won. We outrebounded Boston and we only made 4 three pointers.
Twinkie defense
RealGM
Posts: 20,191
And1: 1,609
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

 

Post#11 » by Twinkie defense » Fri Mar 28, 2008 8:14 am

I really wish the Warriors had at least one guy who was a natural, dead-eye three point shooter... a Mike Miller.
Sleepy51
Forum Mod - Warriors
Forum Mod - Warriors
Posts: 35,709
And1: 2,331
Joined: Jun 28, 2005

Re: Warriors rely on the three-pointer 

Post#12 » by Sleepy51 » Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:19 pm

Twinkie defense wrote:Just thought this was an interesting article relating to Warriors strategy:

http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_8713268

Although it often looks as if the Warriors' offensive strategy is little more than first guy down the court gets to chuck it, Nelson makes clear there is strategy involved.
"It's just part of the way that we have to play," Nelson said.
He has his reasons.
Jester_ wrote:Can we trade Draymond Green for Grayson Allen?
Twinkie defense
RealGM
Posts: 20,191
And1: 1,609
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

 

Post#13 » by Twinkie defense » Sat Mar 29, 2008 2:51 am

I'm glad you're behind Nellie on this one.
Sleepy51
Forum Mod - Warriors
Forum Mod - Warriors
Posts: 35,709
And1: 2,331
Joined: Jun 28, 2005

 

Post#14 » by Sleepy51 » Sat Mar 29, 2008 1:18 pm

Twinkie defense wrote:I'm glad you're behind Nellie on this one.


Are you getting confused or something?

I have not been crusading against Nellie this season. I have had specific criticisms about how some players have been handled on and off the court, but I've also consistently been supportive of some of the coach's decisions and methods as well. You can't "marginalize" :D me as a Nellie hater because it's not true.

I've "hated" not seeing the bigger players on the roster trusted to make more of a contribution more often. I've "hated" not seeing a consistent starting unit allowed to gel and give us a better chance at strong starts in games. Those are both reasonable and valid criticism. There is plent of room to argue both sides of those quesitons with facts and rational analysis. I could be right, I could be wrong, but me disagreeing with coaches decisions on two specific issues of concern doesn't eaqual foaming at the mouth hatred. And considering how we've lost the games that we have lost? I've got a leg and a half to stand on.

Unless you're such a sphincter nuzzling homer as to believe that any criticism at all constitutes hate.

I've been the only person here who has consistently defended and understod the goals of our defensive approach.
Jester_ wrote:Can we trade Draymond Green for Grayson Allen?
Chris Cohan
Banned User
Posts: 16,891
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 23, 2007
Location: NBA Purgatory (Lateral Move)
Contact:

 

Post#15 » by Chris Cohan » Sat Mar 29, 2008 2:26 pm

I don't think the Warriors rely upon the 3 point shot so much as only seems to "control" a game when they make a strong percentage of their nightly, obscenely high number of attempts, many of which are taken in lieu of taxing the defense at all or exerting thought or energy on the part of Baron Davis, Stephen Jackson, or Al Harrington. Nor do they rely upon it in close games they have characteristically coughed up leads in or played manic catch-up in after starting like a WNBA team on Spring Break so much as have no other means of effecting game outcome than to hoist and pray.

But reliance is too strong a word , in my opinion.
Twinkie defense
RealGM
Posts: 20,191
And1: 1,609
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

 

Post#16 » by Twinkie defense » Sun Mar 30, 2008 12:46 am

Sleepy51 wrote:
Twinkie defense wrote:I'm glad you're behind Nellie on this one.


Are you getting confused or something?

I have not been crusading against Nellie this season... You can't "marginalize" me as a Nellie hater because it's not true.


Fair enough, my bad. I think you're a pretty fair-minded, relatively agenda-less poster, punctuated by periodic bouts of snatch-kicking and waxing metaphorical on vaginas.
Chris Cohan
Banned User
Posts: 16,891
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 23, 2007
Location: NBA Purgatory (Lateral Move)
Contact:

 

Post#17 » by Chris Cohan » Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:31 pm

Can we change the thread title to "Warriors rely on 'silly shots'" per the ESPN/AP coverage? Homer- you like to clip and scavenge, I'm surprised ou haven't updated your archives with this one yet:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/recap?gameId=280329007

Baron Davis, who led the Warriors with 28 points, misfired twice on 3-pointers in the final minute.

The Warriors pulled to 109-106 on a breakaway slam dunk by Ellis with 3:13 left, setting the stage for a frenetic finish.

Golden State overcame a double-digit deficit and took an 86-83 lead on Kelenna Azubuike's basket late in the third quarter. The Warriors suddenly looked in complete control at that point but started taking silly shots from all over and wouldn't score again for 6 minutes.

By then, the Nuggets had reeled off a 15-0 run.

Return to Golden State Warriors