ImageImageImageImageImage

Baron: To Trade or Not To Trade?

Moderators: floppymoose, Sleepy51, Chris Porter's Hair

Should we?

Hell yes! Get his ass outta here...
6
15%
If the right deal comes along
25
61%
No way, he's our franchise player, top 5 PG, etc...
10
24%
 
Total votes: 41

gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,347
And1: 5,957
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Baron: To Trade or Not To Trade? 

Post#1 » by gswhoops » Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:48 pm

The title says it all...
Sid the Squid
Banned User
Posts: 26,062
And1: 9
Joined: Sep 16, 2005

 

Post#2 » by Sid the Squid » Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:52 pm

Give me a possible destination...I want names of players.


I just gave you an impossible task.
St.Nick
Banned User
Posts: 15,954
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 21, 2004
Location: Paris, France

 

Post#3 » by St.Nick » Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:53 pm

Certainly if the right deal came along we should trade him. But I think that can be said for any player.

The question is...what could we get for him? He is an expiring contract and a high quality PG. Lets check out the offers and see if there is something that makes real sense.
User avatar
LA Warrior
Pro Prospect
Posts: 844
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: Golden State

 

Post#4 » by LA Warrior » Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:53 pm

i think baron (bad shots and all) is the heart and soul of this team.
Greatest comment I've ever received.
Phil Jackson wrote:I've never really had a favorite poster but this guy might be it. The symbolism he uses is deep and ****.
Hopper15
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,969
And1: 274
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Location: Tried like the dickens

 

Post#5 » by Hopper15 » Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:54 pm

Is that good or bad?
User avatar
crzy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,224
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 10, 2006
Location: San Francisco

 

Post#6 » by crzy » Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:54 pm

It depends. It's all about value.

I'd only trade Baron Davis we received

Option A) A premier big man like Elton Brand
http://www.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=780014


OR

Option B)

BOTH

1) Expiring Contracts AND
2) Top 6 pick

If we select Option B, I think we should dump Stephen Jackson and Al Harrington in a separate deal for a full rebuild.

http://www.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=780028
http://www.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=779912
Image
St.Nick
Banned User
Posts: 15,954
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 21, 2004
Location: Paris, France

 

Post#7 » by St.Nick » Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:00 pm

Im certain we could get Corey Maggette, Brevin Knight, and the Clips lotto pick (8th position as of now). But Maggette and SJax would just take minutes from each other and become redundant. Although if Corey could play the SG position on a nightly basis....

Monta, Maggette, Stephen, Brandan, Andris....not so bad. Throw in Marco, the 8th pick and the 14th pick, and it could be an interesting young team.
User avatar
crzy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,224
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 10, 2006
Location: San Francisco

 

Post#8 » by crzy » Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:02 pm

^^ The Clippers have the 6th pick as of now, and could go up to 5th depending on how the Knicks end up.
Image
Sid the Squid
Banned User
Posts: 26,062
And1: 9
Joined: Sep 16, 2005

 

Post#9 » by Sid the Squid » Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:13 pm

Let me tell you something about these mega-stud PF's of the last 15 years...They don't want to play C for Nellie's gimmick ball...Guy's like Amare, Duncan, Garnett, Webber and Brand want to be PF's..They hate the idea of being a C...
St.Nick
Banned User
Posts: 15,954
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 21, 2004
Location: Paris, France

 

Post#10 » by St.Nick » Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:14 pm

I wonder how badly they would want Baron?

A Baron/Mobley/Thornton/Brand/Kaman lineup would be TOUGH.
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

 

Post#11 » by FNQ » Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:14 pm

What about "God I'd want to trade him but what team will take him for more than we got for him 3 years ago?"

A: None. Larry Harris/Isiah Thomas got fired so there's no one else stupid/desperate enough to attempt something that stupidly risky.
GswStorm3
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,785
And1: 326
Joined: Sep 19, 2007
Location: NorCal
       

 

Post#12 » by GswStorm3 » Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:21 pm

Not trade, if anything go get a backup PG and take some of the workload off Baron. I'd rather change the offensive/defensive scheme's and get rid of Nellie before I dump Baron. Elite PG's are just to hard to come by these days.
St.Nick
Banned User
Posts: 15,954
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 21, 2004
Location: Paris, France

 

Post#13 » by St.Nick » Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:22 pm

So you are saying that Baron would not fetch us anything more than the equivalent of Speedy Claxton and Dale Davis?

Hmm...
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

 

Post#14 » by FNQ » Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:25 pm

St.Nick wrote:So you are saying that Baron would not fetch us anything more than the equivalent of Speedy Claxton and Dale Davis?

Hmm...


That was a huge chunk of expiring contracts... not a bad risk at all considering Baron's injuries and his uninsured contract.

Fast forward to the now... Baron's #s are more impressive but on a team that's gimmicky for improving #s... played little to no defense, chucks a lot, and pouted the last time a coach tried to give him a conservative offense...

I'm sure his value's through the roof though :lol:
St.Nick
Banned User
Posts: 15,954
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 21, 2004
Location: Paris, France

 

Post#15 » by St.Nick » Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:33 pm

Well, lets go down the positive points of Baron Davis (as much as it may hurt you to read this):

-He is an expiring contract
-He is very productive (22/8/5)
-He has proven that his past injuries will not stop him from playing every single game of the season
-He has a penchant for hitting the game winning shot
-He would be an improvement at PG for over 80% of all teams in the league
-He is a marketable player to fans


You still think that he is only worth expiring contracts? :lol:
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

 

Post#16 » by FNQ » Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:39 pm

St.Nick wrote:Well, lets go down the positive points of Baron Davis (as much as it may hurt you to read this):

-He is an expiring contract
-He is very productive (22/8/5)
-He has proven that his past injuries will not stop him from playing every single game of the season
-He has a penchant for hitting the game winning shot
-He would be an improvement at PG for over 80% of all teams in the league
-He is a marketable player to fans


You still think that he is only worth expiring contracts? :lol:


22/8/5 pace adjusted becomes noticably weaker... he's played in every game in a season once since coming here... the game winning shot aspect only applies to teams who are in the playoffs...

But if you are auditioning for Baron's agent, good show.... but there are far too many negatives for a team to give up anything of value for Baron... he wants to play on the West Coast (scratch about 26 teams right there). He makes 19 mil next season - who has that kind of money tied up in players they want to get rid of?

His attitude makes his value low... a team would have to do -ZERO- due diligence to find all this stuff out... thus, a team would have to be desperate... we were desperate when we traded for BD, and what has he shown here that he didn't in N.O. ?

Nothing. Just like his trade value.
Chris Cohan
Banned User
Posts: 16,891
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 23, 2007
Location: NBA Purgatory (Lateral Move)
Contact:

 

Post#17 » by Chris Cohan » Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:45 pm

Baron could use a new agent...
St.Nick
Banned User
Posts: 15,954
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 21, 2004
Location: Paris, France

 

Post#18 » by St.Nick » Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:51 pm

Wow. Just wow. Where to begin...

The Warriors score about 10% more points than any team in the league, so even if you want to shave off 10% of his production then he would still be at 20ppg and 7 apg.

The West Coast requirement thing is mere speculation, not something written in stone. And I dont think that he has a no trade clause in his contract anyways, so he would be powerless to have any say in a deal.

His attitude is only considered a problem by certain posters on this board and by fans of the Hornets. Overall I dont see a problem with a guy that plays 82 Games through injury and is the leader of a near 50 win team.

The matching salaries issue could be something to consider, but thats what this thread is for. Certainly at least a few deals exist which send us back 15M worth of salaries.

His trade value is obviously higher than you give it credit for.
User avatar
LA Warrior
Pro Prospect
Posts: 844
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: Golden State

 

Post#19 » by LA Warrior » Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:57 pm

if the dubs trade Baron they might as well trade for expiring contracts and go into rebuilding mode. Like someone mentioned Baron needs a backup so hes not playing 48 min a game.
Greatest comment I've ever received.
Phil Jackson wrote:I've never really had a favorite poster but this guy might be it. The symbolism he uses is deep and ****.
Chris Cohan
Banned User
Posts: 16,891
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 23, 2007
Location: NBA Purgatory (Lateral Move)
Contact:

 

Post#20 » by Chris Cohan » Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:14 pm

Return to Golden State Warriors