Page 1 of 4
Baron: To Trade or Not To Trade?
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:48 pm
by gswhoops
The title says it all...
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:52 pm
by Sid the Squid
Give me a possible destination...I want names of players.
I just gave you an impossible task.
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:53 pm
by St.Nick
Certainly if the right deal came along we should trade him. But I think that can be said for any player.
The question is...what could we get for him? He is an expiring contract and a high quality PG. Lets check out the offers and see if there is something that makes real sense.
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:53 pm
by LA Warrior
i think baron (bad shots and all) is the heart and soul of this team.
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:54 pm
by Hopper15
Is that good or bad?
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:54 pm
by crzy
It depends. It's all about value.
I'd only trade Baron Davis we received
Option A) A premier big man like Elton Brand
http://www.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=780014
OR
Option B)
BOTH
1) Expiring Contracts AND
2) Top 6 pick
If we select Option B, I think we should dump Stephen Jackson and Al Harrington in a separate deal for a full rebuild.
http://www.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=780028
http://www.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=779912
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:00 pm
by St.Nick
Im certain we could get Corey Maggette, Brevin Knight, and the Clips lotto pick (8th position as of now). But Maggette and SJax would just take minutes from each other and become redundant. Although if Corey could play the SG position on a nightly basis....
Monta, Maggette, Stephen, Brandan, Andris....not so bad. Throw in Marco, the 8th pick and the 14th pick, and it could be an interesting young team.
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:02 pm
by crzy
^^ The Clippers have the 6th pick as of now, and could go up to 5th depending on how the Knicks end up.
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:13 pm
by Sid the Squid
Let me tell you something about these mega-stud PF's of the last 15 years...They don't want to play C for Nellie's gimmick ball...Guy's like Amare, Duncan, Garnett, Webber and Brand want to be PF's..They hate the idea of being a C...
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:14 pm
by St.Nick
I wonder how badly they would want Baron?
A Baron/Mobley/Thornton/Brand/Kaman lineup would be TOUGH.
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:14 pm
by FNQ
What about "God I'd want to trade him but what team will take him for more than we got for him 3 years ago?"
A: None. Larry Harris/Isiah Thomas got fired so there's no one else stupid/desperate enough to attempt something that stupidly risky.
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:21 pm
by GswStorm3
Not trade, if anything go get a backup PG and take some of the workload off Baron. I'd rather change the offensive/defensive scheme's and get rid of Nellie before I dump Baron. Elite PG's are just to hard to come by these days.
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:22 pm
by St.Nick
So you are saying that Baron would not fetch us anything more than the equivalent of Speedy Claxton and Dale Davis?
Hmm...
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:25 pm
by FNQ
St.Nick wrote:So you are saying that Baron would not fetch us anything more than the equivalent of Speedy Claxton and Dale Davis?
Hmm...
That was a huge chunk of expiring contracts... not a bad risk at all considering Baron's injuries and his uninsured contract.
Fast forward to the now... Baron's #s are more impressive but on a team that's gimmicky for improving #s... played little to no defense, chucks a lot, and pouted the last time a coach tried to give him a conservative offense...
I'm sure his value's through the roof though

Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:33 pm
by St.Nick
Well, lets go down the positive points of Baron Davis (as much as it may hurt you to read this):
-He is an expiring contract
-He is very productive (22/8/5)
-He has proven that his past injuries will not stop him from playing every single game of the season
-He has a penchant for hitting the game winning shot
-He would be an improvement at PG for over 80% of all teams in the league
-He is a marketable player to fans
You still think that he is only worth expiring contracts?

Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:39 pm
by FNQ
St.Nick wrote:Well, lets go down the positive points of Baron Davis (as much as it may hurt you to read this):
-He is an expiring contract
-He is very productive (22/8/5)
-He has proven that his past injuries will not stop him from playing every single game of the season
-He has a penchant for hitting the game winning shot
-He would be an improvement at PG for over 80% of all teams in the league
-He is a marketable player to fans
You still think that he is only worth expiring contracts?

22/8/5 pace adjusted becomes noticably weaker... he's played in every game in a season once since coming here... the game winning shot aspect only applies to teams who are in the playoffs...
But if you are auditioning for Baron's agent, good show.... but there are far too many negatives for a team to give up anything of value for Baron... he wants to play on the West Coast (scratch about 26 teams right there). He makes 19 mil next season - who has that kind of money tied up in players they want to get rid of?
His attitude makes his value low... a team would have to do -ZERO- due diligence to find all this stuff out... thus, a team would have to be desperate... we were desperate when we traded for BD, and what has he shown here that he didn't in N.O. ?
Nothing. Just like his trade value.
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:45 pm
by Chris Cohan
Baron could use a new agent...
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:51 pm
by St.Nick
Wow. Just wow. Where to begin...
The Warriors score about 10% more points than any team in the league, so even if you want to shave off 10% of his production then he would still be at 20ppg and 7 apg.
The West Coast requirement thing is mere speculation, not something written in stone. And I dont think that he has a no trade clause in his contract anyways, so he would be powerless to have any say in a deal.
His attitude is only considered a problem by certain posters on this board and by fans of the Hornets. Overall I dont see a problem with a guy that plays 82 Games through injury and is the leader of a near 50 win team.
The matching salaries issue could be something to consider, but thats what this thread is for. Certainly at least a few deals exist which send us back 15M worth of salaries.
His trade value is obviously higher than you give it credit for.
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:57 pm
by LA Warrior
if the dubs trade Baron they might as well trade for expiring contracts and go into rebuilding mode. Like someone mentioned Baron needs a backup so hes not playing 48 min a game.
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:14 pm
by Chris Cohan