ImageImageImageImageImage

Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck

Moderators: Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose, Sleepy51

Sid the Squid
Banned User
Posts: 26,062
And1: 9
Joined: Sep 16, 2005

Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#1 » by Sid the Squid » Tue Jul 1, 2008 7:27 pm

Baron playing halfcourt feed the post hoops?

Let's go with a better title next time. HM
Pmoney
Junior
Posts: 465
And1: 3
Joined: Aug 14, 2006
Location: Tdot

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck donkey balls 

Post#2 » by Pmoney » Tue Jul 1, 2008 7:36 pm

I disagree.

Kaman and brand get up and down
thornton too

If baron made jamal magloire an all star.. he'll make kaman and brand get in the hof
User avatar
yehyeh82
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,101
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 07, 2005
Location: 707

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck donkey balls 

Post#3 » by yehyeh82 » Tue Jul 1, 2008 7:38 pm

If I was the Clippers, I would try to trade Kaman for Camby, who would be a much better fit with Baron and Brand.
User avatar
floppymoose
Senior Mod - Warriors
Senior Mod - Warriors
Posts: 59,230
And1: 17,329
Joined: Jun 22, 2003
Location: Trust your election workers

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck donkey balls 

Post#4 » by floppymoose » Tue Jul 1, 2008 7:41 pm

Camby has lost the fire. I'd stick with Kaman.
User avatar
Master Shake
General Manager
Posts: 7,996
And1: 4
Joined: Oct 04, 2005
Location: Rafi Bomb!

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck donkey balls 

Post#5 » by Master Shake » Tue Jul 1, 2008 8:16 pm

Throw Eric Gordon and Al Thornton in there, and a few decent pickups, that team could be a top seed in the west the next few years...
whatchaknow wrote: I would rather have Batum than Monroe...


Well, at least we aren't Cleveland... seriously... Indians, Cavs, Browns... ouch.
User avatar
Barkley+GS=Love
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,268
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2005
Location: mmmm. brownies.

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck donkey balls 

Post#6 » by Barkley+GS=Love » Tue Jul 1, 2008 8:34 pm

im waiting for Baron and Brand both trying to post up and neither giving up the ball.
Image
props to trixx || I am Formerly Warriorsrule1
azwfan
RealGM
Posts: 15,469
And1: 3,830
Joined: May 21, 2004
     

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck donkey balls 

Post#7 » by azwfan » Tue Jul 1, 2008 8:41 pm

I have always thought Brand would be the perfect 4 to play with Baron. When Baron's hot they're owning, when he's not, Brand's grabbing his misses. Match made in heaven.
LF75 wrote: It was a dumb idea..And yes I'm a dick.
Slim Jones
Ballboy
Posts: 25
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 19, 2007
Location: SFC

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck donkey balls 

Post#8 » by Slim Jones » Tue Jul 1, 2008 8:46 pm

Baron in the half court is laughable. He has to go one on one, or move without the ball in the half court, both of which take too much energy for him to exert. He can't shoot jumpers (25%), so trying to drive on a guy who gives you 4 feet because he doesn't respect your J is tough.

Why in the world would Denver trade Camby to the Clips?!? The Nuggets are trying to lose salary, not add it, and Kaman's contract is bigger than Camby's and longer. Even if you make salaries match, you think Melo and AI want to play with Lurch?

Baron at the 1, Gordon at the 2, Thorton at the 3, Brand at the 4- all running, with Kaman rebounding sounds good for the Clips. I suggest the Clips give Baron the money he wants, and take him off our hands.

Injuries cannot be predicted, but with Baron, they can. He takes an automatic sabbatical for 20 games each season. The only time he doesn't is a contract year; coincidence? It is ridiculous that people are surprised he opted out. He has built the case over the last year for somebody to overpay him, whether it be the Warriors or the some other sucker. He played nice with those epiphanies he had with Jerry West, to playing 82 games, so saying all the right things on KNBR.

I am praying for a blockbuster sign and trade. Give me a power forward who can play center for us, like Wilcox, Lee, Camby. Or a small forward who can rebound like Artest, Magette, Rudy Gay.

I fear the beard. I fear getting stuck with the Broken Down Beard for the next 4 or 5 years...
Sid the Squid
Banned User
Posts: 26,062
And1: 9
Joined: Sep 16, 2005

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck donkey balls 

Post#9 » by Sid the Squid » Tue Jul 1, 2008 8:53 pm

The slimster hits from 3...But he stepped out of bounds with the Maggette comment..Wave off the basket.
Warriorfan
RealGM
Posts: 15,357
And1: 2,801
Joined: Jun 24, 2001
         

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck donkey balls 

Post#10 » by Warriorfan » Tue Jul 1, 2008 9:29 pm

Baron Brand and Kamen are 3 allstars. You know Brand and Kamen can work together. Baron played half court with the Hornets they just need compementary players to create spacing.
User avatar
yehyeh82
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,101
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 07, 2005
Location: 707

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck donkey balls 

Post#11 » by yehyeh82 » Tue Jul 1, 2008 9:37 pm

I don't know if Brand and Kamen can play together. Kamen had one decent year with Brand, but his breakout came with Brand sitting on the bench in a suit. Kamen needs his touches so he can turn it over 4 times a game.
Bill Walton after comparing a Lebron dunk to Angel Falls wrote: Now that is a big waterfall and that was a big throwdown
Clip34life
Analyst
Posts: 3,627
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 19, 2002

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck donkey balls 

Post#12 » by Clip34life » Tue Jul 1, 2008 10:17 pm

There is more discussion of the Clipper's future lineup on the GS board than our board, this is why we need Baron Davis more than you do.
I really like 1840s merchant vessels. Basketball on the other hand, I can take it or leave it...
Slim Jones
Ballboy
Posts: 25
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 19, 2007
Location: SFC

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck donkey balls 

Post#13 » by Slim Jones » Tue Jul 1, 2008 11:16 pm

You're giving me a "Pietrus" for Maggette? I think that is an anticipation call. We do a sign and trade with Clips of Baron, they do the same with Mags, and add Al Thorton to the deal.

Baron for Maggette and Al Thorton.

Everybody will complain about not enough shots, but we score the most in the league! We love shooters, and Thorton will put your boy Buke deeper on the bench.

We need big bodies at the 3 (Maggette, Artest) and 4 (Wilcox, Lee, Anthony Mason) to make up for Beans at the 5 and Tay at the 1. I am still mad at Chucky Atkins for that shoulder check on Monta last year. If I was on the court, I would have decked Chucky, and I'm only 215. We not only need a killer attitude, which we have in Stack Jack, but we need beef to let people know we can 'go in' when need be.


***edited for spelling errors. My bad...
Donkey McDonkerton
General Manager
Posts: 9,189
And1: 411
Joined: Jul 01, 2004
Location: Donkieville
     

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck donkey balls 

Post#14 » by Donkey McDonkerton » Tue Jul 1, 2008 11:27 pm

Ooooh yeah...
turk3d
RealGM
Posts: 36,652
And1: 1,278
Joined: Jan 30, 2007
Location: Javale McGee, Dubs X Factor

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck donkey balls 

Post#15 » by turk3d » Wed Jul 2, 2008 12:00 am

Donkey McDonkerton wrote:Ooooh yeah...

Wouldn't happened to have been the title of this thread that got your attention would it Mr. McDonerton? :lol:
carrottop12
RealGM
Posts: 21,602
And1: 30
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: why you take out my sig for?

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck donkey balls 

Post#16 » by carrottop12 » Wed Jul 2, 2008 1:00 am

I have to say I am not exactly seeing the whole Baron in LA being their missing piece to win a championship idea.

They will be better obviously which is all you can ask, but they aren't serious contenders in the West.
Pmoney
Junior
Posts: 465
And1: 3
Joined: Aug 14, 2006
Location: Tdot

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck donkey balls 

Post#17 » by Pmoney » Wed Jul 2, 2008 1:03 am

Yea they are serious contenders in the west

VERY SERIOUS

EXTREMELY SERIOUS

BDIDDY BABY
User avatar
crzy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,224
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 10, 2006
Location: San Francisco

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#18 » by crzy » Wed Jul 2, 2008 2:18 am

5th seed in the West, at best

Jazz, Lakers, Spurs, and Hornets are all better.
Image
Sleepy51
Forum Mod - Warriors
Forum Mod - Warriors
Posts: 35,709
And1: 2,331
Joined: Jun 28, 2005

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#19 » by Sleepy51 » Wed Jul 2, 2008 2:28 am

The Clippers didn't aquire Baron to win a championship. They aquired him for the same reason we did back when, to be relevant.

If we stay relevant without him then all ends well. If the Clippers have a better record than us over the next 4 years then we screwed the pooch . . . again.
Jester_ wrote:Can we trade Draymond Green for Grayson Allen?
Sid the Squid
Banned User
Posts: 26,062
And1: 9
Joined: Sep 16, 2005

Re: Baron-Brand-Kaman would suck 

Post#20 » by Sid the Squid » Wed Jul 2, 2008 2:30 am

To stay releveant? WTF? Who f****g cares..I hate all the new fans who cheered Fat azz's every move.

Return to Golden State Warriors