Trade for Boozer now!

ARisYourDaddy · Post #1 » by **ARisYourDaddy** » Wed Jul 1, 2009 10:51 pm

We should look to make a quick offer to the Jazz since they are looking to move him quickly in order to resign Millsap...

turk3d · Post #2 » by **turk3d** » Wed Jul 1, 2009 10:54 pm

Maggette + S & T CJ for 3 M for 3 years

Post #3 » by **TheLowlySquire** » Wed Jul 1, 2009 10:58 pm

I'd rather have Millsap. But since he will be a lot harder to get than Boozer, I would say yes to turk3d's deal. They only way I want to trade for Boozer is if Maggette goes.

Coxy · Post #4 » by **Coxy** » Wed Jul 1, 2009 10:59 pm

Boozer, eh?

They'd want Randolph and Andris added in a trade for Booz, and thats a no no.

If they would accept a deal involving Maggette, Wright and fillers (Beli, Azu, ect,), then yes.

AR, Boozer, Andris, Turiaf front court rotation........

They could surely get a better deal elsewhere though.

azwfan · Post #5 » by **azwfan** » Wed Jul 1, 2009 11:18 pm

I'd think the purpose of Utah looking to trade boozer would be to save money to sign Milsap. We have Claxton which could save them money.

How about Claxton, Azubuike, Wright for Boozer?

Coxy · Post #6 » by **Coxy** » Wed Jul 1, 2009 11:29 pm

azwfan wrote:I'd think the purpose of Utah looking to trade boozer would be to save money to sign Milsap. We have Claxton which could save them money.

How about Claxton, Azubuike, Wright for Boozer?

We get a dial tone for that offer.

Sid the Squid · Post #7 » by **Sid the Squid** » Wed Jul 1, 2009 11:32 pm

I'd kill if it insured no Boozer on the warriors

KR4 · Post #8 » by **KR4** » Wed Jul 1, 2009 11:57 pm

Sid the Squid wrote:I'd kill if it insured no Boozer on the warriors

Hahahahahahaa....oh man I laughed out loud at work. So funny.

Boozer stabbed a blind man in the back.

biggd · Post #9 » by **biggd** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 3:36 am

noooooo...not Boozer, he is a total punk. He totally dogged the cavs,i won't forget that

GDS20 · Post #10 » by **GDS20** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 4:16 am

He screws every team he plays for

J-Rich- · Post #11 » by **J-Rich-** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 5:09 am

Luckily j-rich did everyone who hates boozer a favor by embarrassing him on national tv with this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Ha9STYNNXo

Subaculta · Post #12 » by **Subaculta** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 5:46 am

anyone have an idea why he didn't opt out and take the money that detroit would have thrown his direction?

was it just that he wanted more options in 2010?

Chris Cohan · Post #13 » by **Chris Cohan** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 5:49 am

Who says Dumars was interested?
If he wasn't, there's your answer.

Subaculta · Post #14 » by **Subaculta** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 7:22 am

Chris Cohan wrote:Who says Dumars was interested?
If he wasn't, there's your answer.

Just saw Hollinger commented on it... apparently Boozer was asking for too much, passing on him is probably a wise move on Dumars part - blowing all of that money on Gordon/CV is not.

bballguy50 · Post #15 » by **bballguy50** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 7:29 am

Subaculta wrote:
Chris Cohan wrote:Just saw Hollinger commented on it... apparently Boozer was asking for too much, passing on him is probably a wise move on Dumars part - blowing all of that money on Gordon/CV is not.

Seriously. Pistons fans with delusions of a sure-fire Finals appearance next year, and trading for a bona fide C as well. And apparently CV is a legit 20/10 PF now...