Browns @ Ravens (11/18/07)

jerrod · Post #21 » by **jerrod** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:30 pm

miller31time wrote:HOLY ISH

WHAT A FINISH

IT HIT THE FREAKING GOAL POST!!!!!!!!!!!!

RAVENS WIN....RAVENS WIN!!!

awesome

Post #22 » by **miller31time** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:31 pm

What the hell is happening? Are they saying the ball went through the posts?

jerrod · Post #23 » by **jerrod** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:32 pm

wait, what?

the game channel says it's over, i'm pretty sure that's legally binding

Post #24 » by **UTMCretin** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:32 pm

The Ravens have left the field. This is gonna be a heartbreaker of an OT period, assuming of course that it is overturned.

Post #25 » by **miller31time** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:34 pm

Oh my god

Post #26 » by **UTMCretin** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:34 pm

The ball went through the posts, but hit the support bar and bounced back over.

And...

it's good. I think.

jerrod · Post #27 » by **jerrod** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:34 pm

what the hell is happening!!!!!!!

Nowak008 · Post #28 » by **Nowak008** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:35 pm

wait what? how did it get reversed?

Post #29 » by **HMFFL** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:35 pm

They just said it's good

Post #30 » by **miller31time** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:35 pm

Wat a bunch of bull. The refs aren't ALLOWED to view a replay. This game should be over, no matter if it's a technically good kick or not.

Nowak008 · Post #31 » by **Nowak008** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:37 pm

WTF IS GOING ON????

Post #32 » by **UTMCretin** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:38 pm

miller31time wrote:Wat a bunch of bull. The refs aren't ALLOWED to view a replay. This game should be over, no matter if it's a technically good kick or not.

They didn't. They never looked at the replay, it was decided by the officials on the field.

jerrod · Post #33 » by **jerrod** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:38 pm

so it's officially reversed?

Post #34 » by **miller31time** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:39 pm

Nowak008 wrote:WTF IS GOING ON????

Dawson field goal from 51 yards away. It was a strong kick, and actually hit one side of the goal-post. After hitting that one side, it bounced in, but after it bounced in, it hit the underneath part of the field-goal post thing....then bounced out.

The refs said that because it initially went through, it was a made field goal, even though it bounced out in the end.

The refs initially ruled it a missed field goal, but somehow were able to review it, and fix the error.

The then ruled it made and the game has gone into overtime.

Post #35 » by **miller31time** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:40 pm

UTMCretin wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

They didn't. They never looked at the replay, it was decided by the officials on the field.

Didn't Ian Eagle even make fun of the officials, saying they weren't supposed to review it, but did anyway, just "calling it" a "discussion"?

Post #36 » by **UTMCretin** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:41 pm

Nowak008 wrote:WTF IS GOING ON????

51 yard FG attempt by Phil Dawson hits the side of the uprights, then bounces down, passes the threshold and hits the bar that supports the uprights, and bounces back into the field of play. It's good, because it passes the threshold.

On to OT.

Nowak008 · Post #37 » by **Nowak008** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:41 pm

ugh.

This is all my fault for wanting edwards get a lot of fantasy points.

jerrod · Post #38 » by **jerrod** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:42 pm

but i already sent a text message saying they won

Post #39 » by **miller31time** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:45 pm

I can't believe we're going to lose this game.

Post #40 » by **UTMCretin** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:46 pm

miller31time wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Didn't Ian Eagle even make fun of the officials, saying they weren't supposed to review it, but did anyway, just "calling it" a "discussion"?

Okay, just got the full scoop from Boomer. They did review the play, but because it hit something, they were within the rules to do so. Apparently. This also explains why they never said the play was under review. Apparently.