Image Image Image Image

Week 2: Bears at Saints

Moderator: chitownsports4ever

User avatar
emperorjones
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,591
And1: 133
Joined: Jun 16, 2006

Week 2: Bears at Saints 

Post#1 » by emperorjones » Fri Sep 16, 2011 6:12 pm

Image
Image

Statistical Analysis:
http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2011091808/2011/REG2/bears@saints#menu=gameinfo&tab=analyze

Can the Bears send Drew Brees to 0-5 against them lifetime?
Bears interior line faces tough challenge against two Pro-bowl guards?

Discuss

Image
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

Re: Week 2: Bears at Saints 

Post#2 » by WEFFPIM » Fri Sep 16, 2011 8:03 pm

No Barber, probably without Chris Harris and Lance Louis, possibly without Roy Williams, maybe without Brian Urlacher.

It's okay to not feel terribly good about this one.
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

Re: Week 2: Bears at Saints 

Post#3 » by SportsWorld » Fri Sep 16, 2011 9:21 pm

Urlacher is playing.
User avatar
BeKuK
RealGM
Posts: 12,920
And1: 835
Joined: Oct 06, 2009
Location: South Germany
     

Re: Week 2: Bears at Saints 

Post#4 » by BeKuK » Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:13 pm

SportsWorld wrote:Urlacher is playing.


I'm not sure whether this is good!?!?!? Hopefully it is. This willl definitely not be an easy game for him!
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

Re: Week 2: Bears at Saints 

Post#5 » by WEFFPIM » Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:36 pm

Any game with Brian Urlacher is better than one without. Except for a basketball game.
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
User avatar
BeKuK
RealGM
Posts: 12,920
And1: 835
Joined: Oct 06, 2009
Location: South Germany
     

Re: Week 2: Bears at Saints 

Post#6 » by BeKuK » Sun Sep 18, 2011 4:23 pm

I'm so excited .....GO BEARS!
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

Re: Week 2: Bears at Saints 

Post#7 » by WEFFPIM » Sun Sep 18, 2011 5:18 pm

Cannot afford to lose Bennett with Williams out
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

Re: Week 2: Bears at Saints 

Post#8 » by WEFFPIM » Sun Sep 18, 2011 5:27 pm

Well that wasn't roughing the passer at all
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

Re: Week 2: Bears at Saints 

Post#9 » by SportsWorld » Sun Sep 18, 2011 6:37 pm

Johnny Knox and Devin Hester are terrible. It's a joke that this is Cutler's 3rd year here and he still has no good WR's at all. Matt Forte is the only guy worth throwing to.
User avatar
BeKuK
RealGM
Posts: 12,920
And1: 835
Joined: Oct 06, 2009
Location: South Germany
     

Re: Week 2: Bears at Saints 

Post#10 » by BeKuK » Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:39 pm

Why I couldn't miss this one!!!!
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

Re: Week 2: Bears at Saints 

Post#11 » by WEFFPIM » Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:10 pm

Jamarcus Webb is just...just awful. Has killed Cutler on more than one occasion
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
NLK
Head Coach
Posts: 6,093
And1: 9
Joined: Mar 12, 2006
Location: CHICAGO is a big market with many Rings! Eat S#%T New York!

Re: Week 2: Bears at Saints 

Post#12 » by NLK » Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:18 pm

The offensive line coupled with Mike Tice, Lovie Smith, Jerry Angelo, and Ted Phillips are an embarassment to this beloved NFL CHARTER FRANCHISE!!!! You can have the best receivers in the league, but what good is it if you can't buy the QB more than 2 seconds to deliver the ball...SMH! Granted we weren't expecting the OL to be significantly better, but c'mon its Cutler's 3rd season here, buy him some damn guys whose job is to just block and pick up blitzes/defensive shifts.
-NLK: Offending Djiboutians since November 2007
"You don't truly know someone, until you fight them."
"To deny our own impulses, is to deny the very essence that makes us human."
MAQ
RealGM
Posts: 45,829
And1: 2,997
Joined: Feb 28, 2006
Location: Dedication
     

Re: Week 2: Bears at Saints 

Post#13 » by MAQ » Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:31 pm

The game just completely broke down in that 2nd half/4th quarter, but before it got embarrassing (damn that offensive line just gave up at the end, didn't it?), the game was there for the taking.

Culter over threw a couple of guys, and a couple of plays where a WR dropped the ball, and this game stays closer than it was, and we don't have to pass the ball every down, and the Saints don't start every play (defensively) with 7 or 8 in the box.

So, given that, I think the game was lost because of our defense not getting a big play on defense causing a turnover (until the game was already out of hand). If we get that big play from our defense in the first half or early in the second half, the entire direction of the game changes. It's not really the defense's fault per se, as I don't think it's fair to expect them to cause a big turnover EVERY game, but whenever we play well as a team, there is usually a big play made by the defense. No big play this week, and thus we got stomped.

Too bad the Chicago media (and probably the fans) won't find it as simple as that. Things got really embarrassing at the end, but the game was already lost at that point.
GYBE wrote:I don't think my behaviour changes at all when I'm drunk. But when I'm wasted, my girlfriend becomes a real klutz. She starts walking into doors and falling down stairs. Weird.
User avatar
PippenAintEasy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,469
And1: 6
Joined: Jan 26, 2009

Re: Week 2: Bears at Saints 

Post#14 » by PippenAintEasy » Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:59 pm

I'm starting to get the feeling that the offensive line just doesn't like Jay Cutler. Unfortunately, I don't think opposing defenses do either.
From the "Story behind certain jersey numbers" thread...
C'mon Cavs wrote:Larry Hughes wears #32 because he sucks.
NoahISmyNinja
Pro Prospect
Posts: 893
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 29, 2007

Re: Week 2: Bears at Saints 

Post#15 » by NoahISmyNinja » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:11 am

Here's an idea: MIKE MARTZ CALL A DAMN RUN PLAY!

I mean seriously! We have one of the biggest offensive lines in the league and this guy is calling 14,000 pass plays in a row.

We've won our last 10 games in a row when we run 25+ times. When is Lovie Smith gonna get some NUTS and tell this guy to RUN the f***ing football or he's going to lose play calling duties.

This team is BUILT to run the ball. How about 2 TE formation's MIKE?

Why do we have 8 slot receivers? Why doesn't Angelo go out and get a WR that can run a route AND catch the ball?

Why doesn't Earl Bennett start anyway?
The Explorer
RealGM
Posts: 10,751
And1: 3,291
Joined: Jul 11, 2005

Re: Week 2: Bears at Saints 

Post#16 » by The Explorer » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:07 pm

Bears need to trade for 5 first round picks and select 3 offensive lineman and 2 wide receivers. That is the only solution to this mess.
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

Re: Week 2: Bears at Saints 

Post#17 » by WEFFPIM » Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:54 pm

NoahISmyNinja wrote:Here's an idea: MIKE MARTZ CALL A DAMN RUN PLAY!

I mean seriously! We have one of the biggest offensive lines in the league and this guy is calling 14,000 pass plays in a row.

We've won our last 10 games in a row when we run 25+ times. When is Lovie Smith gonna get some NUTS and tell this guy to RUN the f***ing football or he's going to lose play calling duties.

This team is BUILT to run the ball. How about 2 TE formation's MIKE?

Why do we have 8 slot receivers? Why doesn't Angelo go out and get a WR that can run a route AND catch the ball?

Why doesn't Earl Bennett start anyway?


You're asking Mike Martz to completely change his philosophy, which he doesn't do lightly.

I'm agreeing with you, I'm just pointing out why we didn't see it.
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
User avatar
emperorjones
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,591
And1: 133
Joined: Jun 16, 2006

Re: Week 2: Bears at Saints 

Post#18 » by emperorjones » Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:11 am

Its one loss. And one loss that no one had down as a victory - not even me.
The ONLY bad thing about this loss to me is Carimi going down. FO at RT is a disaster.
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

Re: Week 2: Bears at Saints 

Post#19 » by WEFFPIM » Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:38 am

emperorjones wrote:Its one loss. And one loss that no one had down as a victory - not even me.
The ONLY bad thing about this loss to me is Carimi going down. FO at RT is a disaster.


There were more than just one bad thing about this loss.
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.

Return to Chicago Bears