Page 1 of 1
Bears Franchise Matt Forte
Posted: Sat Mar 3, 2012 1:25 am
by WEFFPIM
To the surprise of absolutely no one:
Zach Zaidman @ZachZaidman
#Bears have placed franchise tag on Matt Forte
Re: Bears Franchise Matt Forte
Posted: Sat Mar 3, 2012 1:34 am
by BIGGIEsmalls 23
First the releasing of Adams & Frank OMG, then the franchising of Forte. I'm ready for the next move.
I need for Miami to trade us Brandon Marshall
.
Re: Bears Franchise Matt Forte
Posted: Sat Mar 3, 2012 6:26 pm
by Nolan
Well I can't say I didn't see that coming. Hopefully they can work out a long term deal because we need Forte.
Re: Bears Franchise Matt Forte
Posted: Sat Mar 3, 2012 6:50 pm
by WEFFPIM
I may be in the minority, but I don't think the Bears really do need Forte.
Bears Franchise Matt Forte
Posted: Mon Mar 5, 2012 3:30 am
by rwashin2
WEFFPIM wrote:I may be in the minority, but I don't think the Bears really do need Forte.
yes you are.... Good move by Bears!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Re: Bears Franchise Matt Forte
Posted: Mon Mar 5, 2012 7:24 pm
by heir_jordan22
The Bears might have to pay more in a long-term contract for Forte now because of the contracts Lynch and Foster got.
Re: Bears Franchise Matt Forte
Posted: Tue Mar 6, 2012 3:37 pm
by DJhitek
WEFFPIM wrote:I may be in the minority, but I don't think the Bears really do need Forte.
You are not boss, running backs are dime a dozen IMO. I'd rather get cheap enough options and run a rotation then spend big time money on such a short life span position. Forte is very talented and I love his grit, but it's a business. History tells us the appropriate age and life span for running backs, and to ignore that by dishing out long term contracts without taking that into account is irresponsible.